Connect with us

Opinion

Trump Is Not Bitcoin's Savior

Published

on


The election is over, and Trump is now going to be President again. He pulled off something that hasn’t been done since Grover Cleveland in the 1800s, a successful re-election following a loss after his first term. People all of this space are celebrating this as some kind of victory for Bitcoin, but nothing could be further from the truth.

Ross will likely be freed, Trump is too full of himself to back out of such a trivial to deliver on campaign promise, so he will probably do it. It’s too easy, and something he can parade around and take credit for, so it will happen.

That is where anything substantial will end. A strategic reserve is not happening without the approval of Congress, even seized assets are by law required to be disposed of on the open market. Trump cannot from any reading of his authority I am aware of unilaterally push the federal government to begin accumulating bitcoin. Even if by some miracle that Congress did act to pass such legislation, what good does it do Bitcoin? A government accumulating bitcoin isn’t going to help make it more scalable, it isn’t going to make it more private, it isn’t going to protect it from government overreach and interference. It won’t even help us pay off our debt, the price appreciation necessary for such an outcome is frankly delusional.

Instead the most likely outcome is more of the same. More attacks on Bitcoin privacy. More encroaching regulation in the form of KYC and AML. Miners will likely come under scrutiny as Bitcoin’s elevation onto the global political stage continues. The question of their liability and involvement in confirming sanctioned or otherwise undesirable transactions has already been floating around Washington D.C. for a few years now, the tone of those questions will likely get more serious.

Exchanges and other on/off ramps will likely be pressured to engage in ever more invasive surveillance of their users in pursuit of stamping out terrorism, criminal use, child trafficking, etc. All of the traditional boogiemen of the digital world will be trotted out, and the regulatory noose will be tightened. Sure, Trump might push for enshrining self custody as a right, but does that on its own really provide any serious degree of freedom without privacy? Without censorship resistance?

Trump even spoke in Nashville about regulations, and the expansion and endorsement of stablecoins. “People who see Bitcoin as a threat to the dollar have it exactly backwards.” He wants to push dollar backed stablecoins all over the world, taking advantage of a new route for us to export our inflation without the need for diplomacy. People in other countries can just use them, they don’t need their government to choose to dollarize, or hold dollar reserves. Just download an app and start using them. The approach he wants to take to Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies will breath new life into the dollar, and push Bitcoin down a path to stagnation and capture.

People are cheering this on as a victory for Bitcoin, the reality is it is us entering the gauntlet. It is still an open question whether we can successfully run it and come out the other side without having to make serious and potentially fatal compromises. 



Source link

Opinion

The Trump Pump: A Road To Capture and Failure

Published

on


Well the “Trump Pump” seems to be ripping off spectacularly. Everyone is cheering, euphoric, happy, feeling on top of the world. Knock it off. Yes, the number is going up, everyone’s net worth (on paper) is increasing by the hour, but this is not a matter of celebration.

This is Bitcoin entering the gauntlet. These institutions, this administration, these high net worth individuals, they are not your friends. They are not here for the same reasons as people trying to build a monetary network centered around sovereignty and freedom. They are just here to make a buck, and to maintain this disordinate level of influence and control over the world around them.

These people don’t give a shit about self custody being scalable, or privacy being accessible, or Bitcoin doing anything to bring these tools of freedom to the masses. They care about Number Go Up, that is all. If this run really does turn into what it looks like it could, this presents an existential crisis for Bitcoin. All of these people are buying their seats at the table, and those seats come with much more influence than the aggregate of the average person who has been working hard to accumulate bitcoin the last few years.

Bitcoin consensus is dictated by the economic actors actually using it. If Bitcoin becomes a simple financialized asset dominated by the legacy institutions and actors that it was built to free us from, then proportionally to their level of use they decide consensus. The only choice left to us is to convince them, or deviate by forking off on a much less valuable (and therefore less useful) network.

These people dominating the network this early, before the necessary work is done to make this a viable and scalable network, is sprinting down the road towards ossification. Of people being stuck with no viable option except being wealthy already, or picking their choice of trusted third party to interact with the protocol and network. And none of these people will care.

Why would they support protocol upgrades that improve the scalability or privacy of Bitcoin? They make their living, all they know how to do is insert themselves as middlemen between the average person and the asset they want to interact with, making money by rent seeking as that intermediary. What incentive would they have to unseat themselves from that lucrative position?

Bitcoiners should not get complacent simply because existing holders are watching their net worth increase during this bull market. There is a lot more to do, otherwise Bitcoin will not live up to a fraction of its potential as a tool to spread real freedom.

So what do you value more? Getting rich or helping spread a tool to liberate people who are currently subject to the whims of tyrants and rent seekers?

This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Addiction

The Digit Addiction Pandemic

Published

on


The Dystopian Present – Fiat Has Made Us All Digit Addicts

Everyone wants to make you an addict. Some people sell illicit drugs on the black market and want you to become addicted to them so they can profit from you. The dealers naturally focus on drugs that are physically addictive because they are often the hardest to kick. When they do manage to addict you to them that becomes harder and harder over time. For drug lords and dealers, this is heaven. This virtually guarantees that all customers will be regulars, at least for as long as they survive. For the addict, it depletes the quality of their life. They start to live from one fix to the next. The problem for the dealers is the illegality of the product. Staying in business as a dealer requires a lot of care, caution, and expense. Additionally, much of the total addressable market (TAM) is turned off by drugs’ bad reputation. So what do you do?

If the problem is legality, make legal drugs. The drugs sold in pharmacies are legal and in many cases no less addictive. There’s a drug for every complaint and three dozen for the common cold viruses. Some, like a simple nasal spray, are addictive and can lead to a chronic condition which “locks” you in for life. It’s the same basic business model as the street dealer but with less friction, lower risk, and much better optics. The barrier to entry is that the clients have to be “sick”.

Now consider supermarkets, where the market is perhaps saturated, but the TAM is almost 100% of the population – everyone eats. Junk food can be quite addictive and can make its users sick. Sick junk food junkies might turn to pharmaceuticals without changing their habits, compounding the problem. Now the cycle is complete. As bad as such addictions might sound, and as widespread as they are, the current global addiction is yet worse: the addiction to digits pandemic.

The first case of addiction to digits is in terms of fiat currencies. They have the benefit of transacting with everyone in a particular country. It is very convenient to use those digits as a medium of exchange. Those digit addicts usually say: “I can’t buy anything with bitcoin, so I am not going to buy any.” They are saying, “I am addicted to the benefit of a convenient medium of exchange even though my purchasing power will deteriorate.”

Some people realise that money is usually static. It’s active when people are transacting and passive when they’re just keeping it for later. To be an effective store of value, money needs to preserve (or grow!) its purchasing power over time. A person should not earn the same money twice. When I have savings I should not be forced to actively manage it. So whole market segments focus on the passive use of money. It is strange how the system forces you to actively use your money to solve the passive use – it kind of defeats the purpose. Still, you can’t let it degrade because of inflation. Here there are a few main categories – bonds, real estate, equities, gold, and art.

The bond’s benefit is its promise to return more digits after some period. “Guaranteed” by the state. And they truly do! They give you the benefit of increased digits and at the end of the period even with the more digits, your purchasing power is less than when you started. Still, it beats the ones that just saved. The bond digit addicts will not buy bitcoin because bitcoin in cold storage pays no interest.

The real estate benefit is a digit “yield” in the form of rent and the digit value of the property will be higher. The value of the real estate is a function of the returns it generates every month. The digit value of the building increases because the degrading of the fiat digits happens faster than the degradation of the physical structure. Real-estate addicts will not buy bitcoin because it is not physical and does not pay any digits for rent.

Financial “engineers” invent products for people to bet on against each other. The whole premise of a stock market is that you sell something you have for another thing that may increase in digit value. Each trade has a winner and a loser, but like in a casino, the house always wins in the end. Just another addiction with another kind of dealer. The Bitcoin system is unifying everything into one. In a bitcoin economy, there are no losers because one person’s profit is not necessarily a loss for another. Those addicts would not buy Bitcoin because there is no betting system in Bitcoin and can’t do call or put options or other illusionary “engineering” things so the insiders benefit. If you just buy Bitcoin and HODL for when you need it then all the dealers of that addiction will be out of business.

Gold addicts are addicted to the metal without realizing how it can be used against them. How can anyone tell us how much the market cap of gold is if no one can tell us the exact weight digits of gold that it is found? This is the true Schrödinger’s cat these days. Now owning gold is represented only by a number on a screen, reducing it to the same status as fiat. With fiat currencies, one piece of paper has the number 1 on top and the other has the number 100 on top. We do not care that they are on the same paper value but we value the digits that are written on the paper. The gold digit addiction is the same, but it took longer to foster because everyone can measure its weight rather than rely on arbitrary numbers. Nobody can put 100 on top of 1 kilo of gold and tell you that it is 100 kilos. But since digital displays of gold ownership have largely replaced physical possession, it follows the exact same mechanism as paper. Gold addicts say that bitcoin does not have any physical (metal) properties, so it has no value, and they won’t buy it.

How about the art digit addicts? Their views on bitcoin aren’t very well known since they aren’t very active in the discourse. The benefit of art is in the emotions it evokes. When Bitcoin starts to demonetize the art industry, we will see art digit addicThe Digit Addiction Pandemicts defending its value. Art should be art, it should not be a method for a store of value.

The next digit addiction dominating today’s societies is loyalty programs, like air miles, and loyalty points for discounts, promotions, and exclusive offers. Even to this day, my grandma is looking through the brochure of EVERY store in the area to find a discount of 10 cents cheaper bananas per kilo. Because the companies can’t print currency digits they print loyalty digits. They not only have much greater purchasing power inflation than currencies (most of the time) but they also have much greater controls over when, where and how to actively use them. The addicts of the loyalty digits start orienting their lives around the loyalty program digits and the dealers love it.

The next digit addiction is social media. People get addicted to subscribers, likes, views, etc. The benefit they provide is the platform, the ability to reach a far greater audience than through face-to-face interactions. This addiction is not directly connected to money, but all those digits are what promoters, sponsors and everyone is looking at sponsors and subscribers automatically convert metrics into value to assign worth in fiat.

The next digit addiction is to video games. Gamers get addicted to the tokens needed to “unlock” the “special” item. They start chasing those token digits so hard in the virtual world that they forget to live in the real one. As young players age, their addictions often graduate from game tokens to other digit dealer systems.

The current FOMO digit addiction is to blockchains. Their benefits include faster transactions, more anonymity, and smart contracts to get you hooked. If the creator is not a direct scammer and truly wants to give those benefits to people he is essentially saying that the benefit that he gives is more important than incorruptible money. The benefit of smart contracts is greater than incorruptibility. That is probably a misunderstanding that secure and decentralised money is the base that gives you certainty to build everything on top. If you want to launch rockets into space you do not change gravity to make your use case easier to achieve. If you do, you will destroy all the sports where people need to jump. All the tall buildings and trees will be collapsing because for winds it will be much easier to tilt them. You destroy the way of life on earth but it is nice that we can go to space. If you believe that the benefit is worth it then do the work and build it on Earth without destroying it. Build on Bitcoin!

The next addiction is to the digits of the custodians. Bitcoin ETFs were hotly anticipated and have received plenty of acclaim. But their custodians are getting the punters hooked on convenience. Give me your bitcoin in my custody because you are inadequate to hold it yourself. Give me your Bitcoin, and I will give you digits.

The common trait among all of these digit addictions is that they offer some benefit in return for dependence on certain digit lords. Once people experience the benefit, it becomes that is the thing that traps them. That is one of the struggles of the Bitcoiners to accept that there are benefits to all of the addictions mentioned above. Bitcoin has its benefits and limitations, but the benefits of Bitcoin do not negate the benefits of other things.

This is the source of the greatest conflict between bitcoiners and crypto bros. Bitcoiners should not dismiss other crypto just because they are shitcoins. Instead, we should enter the arena and out-compete them just like we have been for the past 15 years. Some of them do provide nice benefits to get people hooked to their blockchain digits. When we as bitcoiners do not compete with them and learn what we can, we are going to deprive Bitcoin of those benefits. Bitcoin probably shouldn’t adopt every feature that emerges somewhere in the cryptosphere, but competition fosters improvement. As a former professional athlete, I can say that my skills improved the most after losing to a weaker opponent. When a weaker opponent defeats a stronger one, it only means that he revealed a weak spot. Just because the weaker opponent won does not imply that the rules are unfair and need to be changed or the weakling should be disqualified. That is the tactic of the fiat digit lords. If we want to beat more powerful opponents (i.e. fiat currencies), we must also face the weaker ones. Bitcoin’s obvious weak spot was, until recently, its throughput. Enter Lightning Network.. Privacy? Welcome to eCash on top of Bitcoin.

The Battle for Control Continues in a New Domain – The Digit Lords Are Capturing Bitcoin Digit Addicts

The addiction is so ingrained in all of us that even when someone understands Bitcoin and its implications, they transfer their digit addiction onto Bitcoin. For them, the addiction manifests in HODLing, and the object of their obsession is “How much do I have??” and “Is the number going up??” I HODL and want the digit value to rise to give me the “fix” that I need. Still intoxicated by other digits, they are the easiest prey for the custodian digit platforms. By contrast, real Bitcoin maximalists value proof of work above all. Their primary goal is to build a better life for everyone through Bitcoin. Unless you’re building, you’re just a digit addict chasing your high with Bitcoin.

Different people get addicted to different digits. But even if someone benefits a lot from their addiction, that does not mean it is right for you. Michael Saylor was instrumental in helping me recover from my fiat addiction and going clean on Bitcoin. At the same time, he’s hooked on the custodians’ digits. After all, he has billions in the custodians’ digit ecosystem. He preaches to people that it is better to have more custodians of bitcoin. Let’s go ask all the “gold bugs” how that thing turned out for them. Do not get me wrong all the benefits that he is saying are right and they are benefits so what is the difference?

The difference is in the control. In the addictions described above, the users get the high, but they also get hooked. At the same time, a small group keeps control over the digits the addicts use and claims themselves as digit lords. In all those digit addictions, the mechanism is the same. Fiat digits are controlled by fiat digit lords. Air miles digits are controlled by the airline digit lords. Crypto bros are producing ever more blockchain digits with benefits that Bitcoin does not have (yet) to become the blockchain digit lords. The custodian’s digits are controlled by the screen digits lords. They all control the addicts through the digits.

Another reason why the addiction analogy fits so well is that detoxing is so hard. Wonder why “Orange Pilling” is a struggle? Have you tried to take the cocaine away from an addict, or the insulin of a diabetic, or the chocolate from a fat kid? Resistance is natural. A real estate mogul who has spent decades mastering his trade and amassing a fortune is naturally going to resist any force that could demonetise his industry. The HODLer junkies profiting from BlackRock’s ETFs and similar custodians will naturally resist any threat to the number-go-up fix. That is a marriage made in heaven. For the HODL digit addicts, you can see what infrastructure the custodians are setting up to capture you. Check the work of #WhitneyWebb and #MarkGoodwin in their collaborative articles about that topic.

Gold provides a clear example of how the digit custodians work. To analyse gold, you go to a goldsmith who can assess the gold’s weight and purity, not an ETF dealer. The ETF dealer is just the street pusher for the ETF digit lords. They can describe the imaginary trend lines on top of their imaginary digits that are disconnected from the metal. Unless that particular ETF dealer has a direct line to the gold digit lords, his opinion is absolutely worthless. He is just the digit addiction dealer pushing someone else’s product to get his cut. Bitcoin ETFs are no different. Bitcoin can be used as a real store of value! In the fiat system, it is mainly “You store my value!”

The digit lords’ model has its weaknesses. Some try to exploit the model’s mechanics for their own benefit and to avoid becoming addicts. For example:

  • counterfeiting fiat
  • insider trading in the store of value digits
  • hard and soft nepotism in the loyalty digit programs
  • hacks in games
  • all of the above in blockchains

Even though they are not obeying expected addiction behavior, they are still addicts by chasing the same digits. The difference is that if they succeed they are branded criminals (hackers) by the digit lords. They are using the control system as designed and demonstrating that the whole system is exploitable. The exploiters can attain enormous power by those actions but that is not the intention of the system. The digit lords need control to remain a privilege and guard it jealously so that no one else can own the digits but them. That is why they need us to be hooked: no single person’s effort can overcome control over the digits. That is why any system that is disconnected from work will fail in the Bitcoin era.

Bitcoin is the panacea able to cure all addictions. There is no free lunch in Bitcoin. Once connected to the open and permissionless Bitcoin network, all wallets, all investments, all loyalty promotions, all social media, all gaming tokens, and all blockchains will benefit from bitcoin and their first-mover advantage.

First Look at The Addiction The Right Way – Then Take Responsibility to Break It and Be Free

Beyond the number go up addicts, analysts are also addicted to the models evaluating all the addiction digits. If Bitcoin is something genuinely new, then why are we using the same old modeling principles? The power-law model fits a number of real-world phenomena, including bitcoin through most of its history. From the growth of cities to metabolic rates and many other correlations relating to energy expenditure, the power law applies in a surprising number of cases. The power law is a functional relationship between two quantities, where a relative change in one quantity results in a relative change in the other quantity proportional to a power of the change, independent of the initial size of those quantities. In other words one quantity varies as a power of another. Funny how the name of the model coincidentally (or not) suggests using it for things connected to power. Bitcoin is inseparable from energy (power), so the power law is probably the proper tool. That is why the power law of the hash rate will never break even if the fiat price power law might.

Since engineers have built Bitcoin, their models explain the technology best. But when it comes, to financial analysts they are not modeling reality – they are trying to model the collective psychology about particular digits. Elon Musk is not going to land a rocket on Mars powered by likes or fanboys. The only way is to model reality and then build it. Reality is uncompromising, and inspiration only takes you so far. Either the model is accurate and the execution works, or the rocket explodes. Over time, reality will defy even the best financial models, but they can accurately capture what the collective psychology values in the short term. That’s why the financial “engeneers” hypnotize the digital addicts and get them hooked. In the meantime, Bitcoin continues to do its thing regardless of what any of us think about its future – it is an uncompromising force of nature.

Perhaps there’s a less fickle way to evaluate companies. Let’s take NVIDIA, the current FOMO stock. The digit value unit of a stock is connected to a digit unit of the share. Neither quantity is directly connected to energy and, therefore, can be created at will. But what if someone maps the produced GPUs by NVIDIA? It is just a hunch but it probably follows a power law – the production capacity of the chips is limited by physics. The production of the company can’t break reality to scale but when you cross-reference it with the stock price, you may see when those digits are driven by the current psychology of the “market” or by fundamental value. #GiovaniSantostasi is the person to do the math on that and say if he can innovate a new way of evaluating stocks with the power law model. I may be talking out of my ass for the stocks valuation application of the model but he proved that this is the only model that maps the journey to hyperbitcoinisation.

And what about digits that no one controls? Some digits are connected to reality, which is very useful: the digits for time, the digits for length, the digits for weight, and the digits for temperature. Reality does not care about what we think about it. Reality just is, and we use digits to understand it. That is the language of the engineers, not economists. The numbers not connected to physical energy are numbers backed by a group’s opinion. They can be captured and controlled. Engineers’ digits are free. They resist control. Even those who haven’t mastered them can benefit from those who have. They are the ones building the roads, the computers, and everything else we need in modern life. The difference between open digits and controlled digits is that the addicts of the controlled digits depend on the digit lords for where, when, and how they can benefit. You can’t use the digits of one country outside its borders freely. You can’t use one company’s loyalty digit points with its competitors. You can’t use the token digits from a game to buy a coffee. You can’t buy MicroStrategy stock digits without a bank account.

Michael Saylor always says that there is nothing worth buying in Africa even if you had a billion dollars to spend. That is grossly biassed towards the passive use of money – saving their purchasing power. If you are a billionaire it sure is a problem. But if you want humanity to flourish, the most important thing is to build stuff! Africa is a very important part of humanity, and we need to figure out what to build and how to facilitate spending, so they can get to the point of caring about store of value billionaire digit addiction problems and even beyond the addicion. Saving is just a partial view of that one store-of-value use case. My point is not that Saylor is wrong to protect his castle. Rather, we need to build castles for everyone and then they can start protecting them. His blind spot is that the custodians now want to co-opt Bitcoin as a store of value so they can continue the 2% inflation game and remain digit lords. The difference is that with Bitcoin the 2% inflation game runs on a decentralised global standard. Different countries and banks can connect to it and profit, but that attracts the degenerate custodians (companies, banks, and states) that will print digits on top of Bitcoin. At some point, a bank run on the most degenerate custodian digit lord is inevitable. Then the domino effect of bankruptcies that they can stop in the fiat system is not something that they can do in the Bitcoin system. So buckle up! The biggest volatility may lie ahead. The people that we call poor do not have access to custodian institutions, but now they can run their own Bitcoin nodes. For the first time ever, unprivileged societies have the tools to take back all the purchasing power that was stolen from them by the digit lords without spilling blood.

Take control of the math you use, and take control over the money you use, so you can take control of the life you lead. Otherwise, there will come a time when you will beg someone in control to come and save you. This message is addressed to those without control, but this message is also relevant to those who already realise what Bitcoin is and need to prepare for the day when the addicts come and beg us to save them. We need to start working on becoming people of virtue #Alex Svetski. We must not become digit lords, but actually detoxify people effectively and cooperate. Do not sit on your hands, just HODLing. Build that future. Anyone who’s been in Bitcoin for more than 4 years (one cycle) should be running a node and taking more control into their hands. Anyone who has profited from Bitcoin’s appreciation should be thinking about what they want and how to integrate Bitcoin into those goals. No coding or technical expertise is required. All the analog infrastructures need to be integrated with the Bitcoin infrastructure. Barbers need to start accepting Bitcoin and telling the community. The barber infrastructure has to be connected to the Bitcoin infrastructure along with all the others.

The digit lord companies should consider replacing air miles with sats? Replace in-game tokens with milisats? The digit lords could do this immediately. This is Bitcoin’s ultimate, imminent network effect. Inflation in all the addiction digits will accelerate. The digit lords will do everything they can to keep addicts in their digit drug ecosystem. At the same time, companies that have already adopted Bitcoin will actually save them from bankruptcy. The digit lords will then serve all of us, and whoever gives the most benefits will be the one that WE choose, and they will fight for our vote and support.

Until you drop the digit addiction, you will never be free. Reality is uncompromising for those (companies or countries) who do not navigate its rules/laws properly. This is exactly the problem that the digit lords face as long as the digits are connected to reality. Someone can always verify the accuracy of the digits. I can lie about today’s date, but you can verify. I can lie about the weight of something, but you can verify – maybe not applicable for gold :). I can lie about your height, but you can verify. I can lie about the temperature, but you can verify. Now, for the first time ever, money digits are connected to reality through Bitcoin, and everyone can verify! Lies won’t last long. Just ask the FTX, Celsius, and Terra Luna digit lords. They may control their closed-digit systems, but no one controls reality. That is exactly why we will win #MartyBent! The digit lords are addicted to that control, but people are building solutions to transfer control from the digit lords to individuals. Whether the digit lords realise it or not, they are losing ever more digit addicts to a system that is detoxing them. Losing addicts is fine if you can get them hooked on another substance. Referring back to the chemical drugs mentioned above, that we looked at at the beginning of the article. This is why digit lords will do anything to keep their addicts hooked on the next digits. Now that people have Bitcoin – money inseparable from reality – we have clear detoxified heads. We will never go back to the addiction. The current dynamic is that the digit lords will chase our attention, but we will never give them back the control. I will happily take a discount on a vacation flight, but I will not serve the digits lords’ agenda. I will not obey the digit lords’ vacation plans for me whatever loyalty digits they offer. They will serve my plans and orient their services around my needs.

One of my favorite phrases from #JeffBooth: There is no they; there is only we! It is incumbent on all of us to take control and become “we”. The digit lords are the “they” people usually refer to. In the current system, there are digit lords, digit dealers, and digit addicts. In the Bitcoin system, addicts detox, dealers build detoxing tools, and no one is a digit lord. And brings us back to Jeff’s statement there is only we in the Bitcoin system!

Congratulations on reaching the end of this article! Few people take any time to digest anything more demanding than a meme, but not you. If these ideas are worth spreading, please share the link. If you think that they are worth discussing on a podcast, tell the podcasters to hit me up, and I would be happy to chat with them. May we all live without addiction and build what we want for ourselves and for the kids #GregFoss.

P. S. Love to all the orange brothers and sisters out there. Godspeed!

This is a guest post by Ivan Makedonski. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.



Source link

Continue Reading

back to the future

Great Scott! If Only We Could Go Back to 2009 to Buy Bitcoin!

Published

on


Follow Mark on X.

It’s 2024. Donald Trump has just clinched the election again, Bitcoin’s hit a new all-time high, inflation’s running hotter than the DeLorean’s flux capacitor, and everyone’s wondering, “What’s next?” As we all wrestle with the wild pace of history, there’s a flash in the sky, a crackle of lightning, and who should appear but Doc Brown himself. He hops out of the DeLorean, eyes wild and hair wilder, and says, “Forget sports almanacs, Marty! We’re going back – not to 1985, but to 2009, before anyone knew what a Bitcoin even was!”

Yes, we’d all love to jump into that time machine and zip back to January 3, 2009 – the day Bitcoin’s genesis block was mined. Get it cheap, stockpile our wallets, and maybe even tuck a few under the couch cushions. But here’s the catch: Bitcoin doesn’t work that way. Its greatest strength? “Everyone gets the price they deserve.” No one gets a free ride, and Bitcoin doesn’t have a rewind button – only a road forward.

Doc Brown was onto something when he said, “Roads? Where we’re going, we don’t need roads!” The path Bitcoin forges isn’t one of shortcuts or regrets. It’s a one-way journey to the future, with a price tag that keeps moving forward. It doesn’t care if we wish we’d started at $1 or $100 – it’s relentless, and that’s the point.

Today, people freeze at the current price, haunted by unit bias, plagued by a “missed opportunity” that exists only in hindsight. But Bitcoin’s value doesn’t lie in a magical price point of the past; it lies in the present – in its steady march into the future. And standing on the sidelines, waiting for some impossible dip or trying to summon 2009 prices, is like being Biff: always scheming, always missing the point.

If Marty learned anything, it’s that you can’t stand on the fence and hope things will work out. Biff, forever clueless and out of touch, is the perfect example of what happens when you miss the future staring you in the face. Imagine Biff in 2009 – he’d be mocking Bitcoin, laughing it off, and then spending decades regretting every lost satoshi. Don’t be a Biff. Don’t let hindsight or wishful thinking stop you from joining the future.

We all wish we’d snagged Bitcoin at the price of a coffee, but that DeLorean opportunity is long gone. Doc Brown would tell us the same thing he told Marty: “The future is what you make of it, so make it a good one.”

So, next time you’re looking at Bitcoin’s price today, heart pounding like you’re about to hit 88 mph, remember: there’s no going back to 2009. There’s just the next block, the next satoshi, and the next step forward. Where Bitcoin’s going, we don’t need time travel – we just need the courage to act. And like Doc would say, when it comes to Bitcoin, where we’re going, we don’t need regrets.

This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon