Connect with us

DeFi

Red-Hot DeFi Platform Usual Faces Backlash as Protocol Update Triggers Sell-Off

Published

on



Usual Protocol, an up-and-coming decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol that has seen a remarkable rise over the past months, faced community backlash on Friday after a tweak in the protocol’s yield-generating token triggered a sell-off on secondary markets.

Amid the turmoil, the protocol’s USD0++ token, which represents a locked-up – or staked – version of its $1-anchored stablecoin USD0, fell briefly below 90 cents from $1 on decentralized marketplace Curve. The protocol’s governance token, USUAL, plummeted as much as 17% through the day before recovering some of the losses.

The selloff was caused by a change in the redemption mechanism of USD0++ token introduced by the team on Thursday that caught investors and liquidity providers off-guard.

By design, USD0 is backed by short-term government securities to keep its price at $1. Stakers on Usual receive USD0++ that comes with a four-year lock-up period, meaning that investors are locking up their funds without being able to redeem in exchange for rewards earned in the form of the protocol’s USD0 and USUAL tokens. Yield farmers rushed in, catapulting the protocols total value locked (TVL), a key DeFi metric, to $1.87 billion earlier this week from less than $300 million in October.

However, the new feature called “dual-path exit” will allow investors to redeem the locked-up tokens early at a 0.87 USD0 floor price, or at par, by giving up a part of the rewards earned, calling the 1:1 exchange rate into question.

The abrupt implementation drew criticism across DeFi users for changing the design without warning. In certain liquidity pools, the token’s price was hardcoded to worth $1, causing havoc among borrowers and liquidity providers.

“Did they just allow degens to jump in at 1:1 and then rug the USD0++?,” prominent DeFi analyst Ignas said in an X post. “They pushed for the largest USD0/USD0++ pool on Curve knowing all well that USD0++ shouldn’t trade at 1:1.”

“DeFi continues learning the most important truth about pegs: a peg is a story about why two things that are not the same are interchangeable for each other,” noted Patrick McKenzie, advisor to payments firm Stripe.

The Usual team said in a statement that the design change with the early unstaking mechanism was communicated in advance from October. The protocol will also activate the revenue switch starting on Monday and start distributing the protocol’s earnings to governance token holders who stake their coin for longer-term (USUALx).

“The current situation regarding USD0++ stems from a misunderstanding of the protocol’s mechanisms along with a communication that should have been better articulated,” the statement reads. “We apologize and we’ll continue to do our best to communicate transparent information to users.”

The episode is another lesson for crypto investors about the potential risks of DeFi products that entice users with high-yields via token incentives and rewards flywheels.

“Users who are taking risk need to know what the exact rules are and be able to trust that they won’t change, otherwise it can result in market panic,” Rob Hadick, general partner at venture capital firm Dragonfly, told CoinDesk. “We should be thankful this happened now, before the protocol became a risk to the broader DeFi ecosystem.”

Still, USD0++ traded recently at 0.91 USD0 in the Curve pool, while the protocol’s total value locked, a key DeFi metric, dropped below $1.6 billion.





Source link

Borrowing

Why You May Want To Redeem Your Bitcoin From THORChain's Lending Service

Published

on


Follow Frank on X.

Two days ago, the atebites X account pointed out that THORChain’s lending service currently has nowhere near enough bitcoin to repay its creditors.

As of the time of the post, the total amount of bitcoin to be repaid to depositors was 1,604, while the lending pool only had 592 bitcoin in it.

As Lava founder Shehzan Maredia explained in a post on X, when you borrow on THORChain, they sell the bitcoin you put up as collateral for their own token, RUNE. When you repay your loan, they sell the RUNE for bitcoin to give you back your collateral.

The actual mechanics of how this works are a bit more complex and are detailed on THORChain’s website.

See screenshots from the website below:

The primary issue in this scenario is that half of the value borrowed in U.S. dollar denominations was borrowed when bitcoin traded at significantly lower prices than that at which bitcoin trades today, according to atebites.

This means that for THORChain to meet its current demands, it will need to mint upwards of 24 million RUNE (as of January 8). While this would only be about 8% of the circulating supply of RUNE, it would lead to a reduction in the price of the asset, which would give THORChain even less purchasing power as they try to buy bitcoin back on behalf of their creditors.

If traders were to start shorting RUNE on top of this, THORChain’s ability to purchase the required amount of bitcoin to redeem its creditors would diminish even further.

This could lead to something akin to the Terra/Luna death spiral we saw in 2022.

With that said, prominent supporter of the project Erik Voorhees shared that THORChain’s lending service is operating as it was intended to and that there is no foreseeable danger.

A core developer for THORChain that goes by the name Nine Realms on X also made the case that THORChain is resilient:

While it surely isn’t a given that this situation will end in disaster, you may want to redeem the bitcoin you’ve put up as collateral via THORChain’s lending service just in case.

This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.





Source link

Continue Reading

Bitcoin

SAFE rallies 20% on Bithumb listing

Published

on



SAFE, the native token of Safe Wallet, surged 20% as Bithumb listed the token on its platform.

Safe (SAFE) rose to $1.10 on Jan. 10, marking a 20% surge from its monthly low of $0.924 while bringing its market cap to nearly $600 million at the time of writing.

The altcoin’s rally occurred in a high-volume environment. Its daily trading volume surged by 429%, climbing from $15 million early Thursday morning to over $80 million.

Despite the recent rally, the altcoin still holds significant growth potential, considering that SAFE’s price remains 69% below its all-time high of $3.56 in April last year.

SAFE rallied as Bithumb, a major South Korea-based crypto exchange, announced it would add a KRW trading pair for the SAFE token on Jan. 10, along with SONIC and AHT tokens.

A SAFE/KRW trading pair will allow direct trading between the SAFE token and the South Korean won, making it more accessible to a wider audience, particularly in the South Korean market.

Typically, a listing on a premier South Korean exchange such as Upbit or Bithumb results in a strong rally in the related token. One such instance was reported earlier in October last year when SAFE secured a listing on Upbit, leading to a 72% surge in just one day. 

SAFE also rallied as a result of increased demand among its derivatives traders. According to CoinGlass, open interest for SAFE in the futures market surged by 151% over the past day, reaching $19.5 million, much higher than the $5.5 million recorded at the beginning of the year.

However, it’s important to note that rallies following exchange listings often face a reversal as investors sell their holdings to secure profits. Notably, data from CoinGlass shows that over $5.96 million SAFE was sent to centralized exchanges on Dec. 10, compared to the $5.65 million withdrawn.

Additionally, the weighted funding rate for SAFE at press time was -0.6690%, which means short sellers were dominating the market, with more traders betting on its price to dip lower.

Such levels also increase the possibility of a short squeeze if the price reverses upwards, potentially forcing short positions to close.

At press time, SAFE had wiped most of its gains, falling 7% from its daily high, and was trading at $1.01 per coin.



Source link

Continue Reading

cryptocurrency

K-pop giant Cube Entertainment’s CEO under fire for misleading crypto investment guarantees

Published

on



South Korea’s Cube Entertainment is under scrutiny after its CEO, Kang Seung-gon, was accused of allegedly misleading investors into a cryptocurrency investment that resulted in significant financial losses.

A coalition of investors has accused Kang of promoting Nestree, a cryptocurrency launched by South Korean blockchain firm Nestree Media Group, as a promising investment with guaranteed returns, according to a Jan. 9 report by local media outlet The Korea Economic Daily.

Nestree Media Group advertised itself as a blockchain-based technology company specializing in community-focused messenger services and e-commerce platforms. Its cryptocurrency, Nestree, was listed on major South Korean exchanges, including Coinone in August 2019 and Bithumb in April 2020.

Notably, the K-pop company’s CEO made these claims following reports of Cube Entertainment’s 100 million won ($68,376) investment in Nestree Media Group through a capital increase in March 2022, which triggered a tenfold surge in the cryptocurrency’s price in less than a month’s time.

However, not long after Kang’s comments, the token’s value reportedly crashed from a high of 59 won to around 39 won within a month, ultimately plummeting to single digits by the end of 2022.

Around this time, investors, some of whom reportedly invested as much as 80 million KRW (roughly $54,567) in the cryptocurrency, demanded their principal be returned, but Kang denied ever guaranteeing such returns.

Further investors alleged that at the time, Kang suggested they could recoup their losses by investing in other cryptocurrencies he claimed to be working on listing on domestic exchanges.

According to The Korea Economic Daily, Kang has dismissed all allegations as baseless and said he never advised anyone to invest in Nestree with a guarantee of principal protection. 

Regarding Cube Entertainment’s investment in the project, he said it was a move to expand the company’s blockchain portfolio and affirmed that their collaboration with Nestree Media Group would continue as planned. 

Kang also admitted to personally investing in Nestree but claimed he did not profit from the investment.

Investors are reportedly considering legal action against Kang, who could face serious consequences if the allegations are proven true, and his actions might be deemed a form of market manipulation under South Korean law.

South Korea’s crackdown on market manipulation

South Korean regulators do not take allegations of market manipulation lightly, having charged several individuals in the past who were found guilty of such activities.

On Jan. 3, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office’s Virtual Asset Joint Investigation Team arrested two individuals who allegedly profited from manipulating the price of the ACE cryptocurrency on Bithumb. 

Similar charges were brought against an individual market maker in July, while four employees of crypto exchange Coinone were indicted in May 2023 for alleged market manipulation involving 46 coins during its listing process.

In May of 2024, South Korea’s Ministry of Justice established a special task force to monitor and mitigate market manipulation and fraud in the crypto sector.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon