Uncategorized
Sophisticated crypto address poisoning scams drain $1.2M in March
Published
2 days agoon
By
admin
Victims of address poisoning scams were tricked into willingly sending over $1.2 million worth of funds to scammers, showcasing the problematic rise of cryptocurrency phishing attacks.
Address poisoning, or wallet poisoning scams, involves tricking victims into sending their digital assets to fraudulent addresses belonging to scammers.
Pig butchering schemes on Ethereum have cost the crypto industry over $1.2 million worth of funds in the nearly three weeks since the beginning of the month, wrote onchain security firm Cyvers in a March 19 X post:
“Attackers send small transactions to victims, mimicking their frequently used wallet addresses. When users copy-paste an address from their transaction history, they might accidentally send funds to the scammer instead.”
Source: Cyvers Alerts
Address poisoning scams have been growing, since the beginning of the year, costing the industry over $1.8 million in February, according to Deddy Lavid, co-founder and CEO of Cyvers.
The growing sophistication of attackers and the lack of pre-transaction security measures are some of the main reasons for the increase, the CEO told Cointelegraph, adding:
“More users and institutions are leveraging automated tools for crypto transactions, some of which may not have built-in verification mechanisms to detect poisoned addresses.”
While the higher transaction volume due to the crypto bull market is a contributing factor, pre-transaction verification methods may stop a significant amount of phishing attacks, said Lavid, adding:
“Unlike traditional fraud detection, many wallets and platforms lack real-time pre-transaction screening that could flag suspicious addresses before funds are sent.”
Related: August sees 215% rise in crypto phishing, $55M lost in single attack
Address poisoning scams have previously cost investors tens of millions. In May 2024, an investor sent $71 million worth of Wrapped Bitcoin to a bait wallet address, falling victim to a wallet poisoning scam. The scammer created a wallet address with similar alphanumeric characters and made a small transaction to the victim’s account.
However, the attacker returned the $71 million days later, after he had an unexpected change of heart due to the growing attention from blockchain investigators.
Related: Ledger users targeted by malicious ‘clear signing’ phishing email
Phishing scams are a growing problem for the crypto industry
Phishing scams are becoming a growing threat to the crypto industry, next to traditional hacks.
Pig butchering scams are another type of phishing scheme involving prolonged and complex manipulation tactics to trick investors into willingly sending their assets to fraudulent crypto addresses.
Pig butchering schemes on the Ethereum network cost the industry over $5.5 billion across 200,000 identified cases in 2024, according to Cyvers.
The average grooming period for victims lasts between one and two weeks in 35% of cases, while 10% of scams involve grooming periods of up to three months, according to Cyvers data.
Pig butchering victim statistics and grooming periods. Source: Cyvers
In an alarming sign, 75% of victims lost over half of their net worth to pig butchering scams. Males aged 30 to 49 are most affected by these attacks.
Phishing scams were the top crypto security threat of 2024, which netted attackers over $1 billion across 296 incidents as the most costly attack vector for the crypto industry.
Magazine: Down to $200 one day, Pixels founder had $2.4M the next: Luke Barwikowski, X Hall of Flame
John Reed Stark opposes regulatory reform at SEC crypto roundtable Investors Withdraw 360,000 Ethereum From Exchanges In Just 48 Hours – Accumulation Trend? The FAIR Act Would Protect Bitcoin Holders Russian National Set To Forfeit Nearly $23,000,000 After Agreeing To Plead Guilty to Crypto Market Manipulation German regulator prohibits sales of Ethena USDe US Treasury Lifts Sanctions Against Ethereum Mixer Tornado Cash Published on By John Reed Stark, the former director of the Office of Internet Enforcement at the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), pushed back against the idea of regulatory reform at the first SEC crypto roundtable. The former regulator said the Securities Act of 1933 and 1934 should not be changed to accommodate digital assets and urged that digital assets do not escape the definition of securities under the current laws. The first-ever SEC crypto roundtable. Source: SEC “The people buying crypto are not collectors. We all know that they are investors, and the mission of the SEC is to protect investors,” Stark said. The former official added: “The volume of case law has developed so quickly because of all these crypto firms. They went for this sort of delay, delay, delay, idea, and they hired the best law firms in the world, and these law firms all fought the SEC with incredible briefs.” “I have read every single one of them. And they lost just about, I would argue, every single time,” he continued. Stark concluded that he saw no innovation in digital assets or cryptocurrencies compared to previous online revolutions, such as the debut of the iPhone. John Reed Stark, pictured on the far right, arguing against comprehensive regulatory reform. Source: SEC Related: SEC’s deadline extension is a ‘fork’ in case against Coinbase — John Reed Stark Stark has been one of the most vocal opponents of cryptocurrencies and the digital asset industry, often criticizing the industry for a lack of transparency and accountability. In February 2024, the former SEC official characterized a sponsorship deal between the Dallas Mavericks — a National Basketball Association (NBA) team — and crypto firm Voyager as an agreement with a “heroin manufacturing firm.” Stark later said that the government agency’s regulation by enforcement under former chairman Gary Gensler was warranted and added that cryptocurrency must conform to existing laws rather than the law evolving to embrace the future of money. Stark’s anti-crypto stance has been criticized by industry executives and investors as unhinged. In June 2023, notable investor Mark Cuban called out Reed’s views as “crypto derangement syndrome.” Magazine: SEC’s U-turn on crypto leaves key questions unanswered Published on By South Korean authorities are reportedly looking into blocking crypto exchange platforms that may have operated without adhering to the requirements set by the country’s financial regulator. On March 21, local media Hankyung reported that the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission is considering sanctions against crypto exchanges for allegedly operating in the country without reporting as an operator to the appropriate regulators. South Korean financial authorities require crypto exchanges to report to regulators as virtual asset service providers (VASPs) under the country’s Specified Financial Information Act. The FIU is investigating a list of exchanges and is conducting consultations with related agencies. The regulator is also considering sanctions, such as blocking access to the exchanges, as they begin to prepare countermeasures. The regulator will reportedly crackdown on exchanges allegedly providing services to South Koreans without the appropriate VASP reports. The exchanges in the FIU’s list reportedly provided marketing and customer support to Korean investors without going through the country’s compliance process. Local media Hankyung mentioned that the crypto exchange KuCoin was on the list along with other crypto platforms. In a statement, a KuCoin representative told Cointelegraph: “We are closely monitoring regulatory developments across all jurisdictions, including Korea. At KuCoin, we believe that compliance is essential for the healthy and sustainable growth of the crypto industry—this has always been our stance and will continue to guide us as we move forward. We remain committed to supporting the industry’s long-term development through proactive and responsible practices.” Under the country’s laws, operators of crypto sales, storage, brokerage and management are required to report to the FIU. If exchanges don’t comply, their business will be considered illegal and subject to criminal penalties and administrative sanctions. An FIU official said in the report that measures to block access to the exchanges included in the list are being reviewed. The official said the financial regulator is currently consulting with the Korea Communications Standards Commission, the regulator in charge of the internet, on how they can block access to the exchanges. Related: Wemix denies cover-up amid delayed $6.2M bridge hack announcement Apart from foreign exchanges, South Korean crypto exchanges are also facing scrutiny over suspicions and rumors of financial misconduct. On March 20, prosecutors raided Bithumb following suspicions that its former CEO, Kim Dae-sik, embezzled company funds to purchase an apartment. The authorities suspect that the exchange and its executive may have violated some financial laws during the apartment purchase. However, Bithumb responded that Kim had already taken a loan to repay the funds. In addition, rumors of intermediaries getting paid to list projects on Bithumb and Upbit surfaced. Citing anonymous sources, Wu Blockchain said projects claimed to have paid intermediaries millions to get listed on the exchanges. Upbit responded, demanding the media outlet to disclose the list of digital asset projects that paid brokerage fees. Magazine: Crypto fans are obsessed with longevity and biohacking: Here’s why Published on By Bitcoin bulls who still think the cycle peak has yet to come as retail investors haven’t piled in yet might be using an outdated playbook, according to a crypto executive. “The idea that the cycle isn’t over just because onchain retail activity is absent needs reconsideration,” CryptoQuant founder and CEO Ki Young Ju said in a March 19 X post. Ju said that those tracking retail movements using only onchain metrics will not have seen the full picture. “Retail is likely entering through ETFs — the paper Bitcoin layer — which doesn’t show up onchain,” Ju said. “This keeps the realized cap lower than if the funds were flowing directly to exchange deposit wallets,” he added, noting that 80% of spot Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund (ETF) flows come from retail investors — a trend that Binance analysts already once observed in October last year. Since the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, inflows have totaled around $35.88 billion. Source: Farside At the time, the analysts said most of the ETF buying likely came from retail investors moving their holdings from wallets and exchanges into funds with more regulatory protection. Ju was responding to counter-arguments over his earlier prediction on X that the “Bitcoin bull cycle is over” on March 17. “I’ve been calling for a bull market over the past two years, even when indicators were borderline. Sorry to change my view, but it now looks pretty clear that we’re entering a bear market,” he said. Ju explained that certain indicators are showing a lack of new liquidity, which is likely being driven by macro factors. He also clarified when he said the bull cycle was over, he meant Bitcoin could take “6-12 months” to break its all-time high, not that it’s about to crash. Related: Bitcoin is just seeing a ‘normal correction,’ cycle peak is yet to come: Analysts Traders often look at retail investor activity to spot signs of exhaustion or as a signal to start selling when the market appears overheated. There are several sentiment indicators which help market participants understand the level of retail interest in the market. One of these is the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, which measures overall crypto market sentiment, reading a “Fear” score of 31, down 18 points from its “Neutral” score of 49 yesterday. Other common signals used to track the level of retail interest in the crypto market include Google search trends for “crypto” and related keywords and the popularity of crypto applications in major app stores worldwide. While the Google search score for “crypto” worldwide was at a score of 100 during the week of Jan. 19 – 25, when Bitcoin reached its all-time high of $109,000 and US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, it has since declined by almost 62%. The amount of searches on Google for “crypto” has declined almost 62% since the end of January. Source: Google Trends At the time of publication, the Google search score for “crypto” stands at 38, with Bitcoin trading 22% below its January all-time high. Magazine: Memecoins are ded — But Solana ‘100x better’ despite revenue plunge This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. Arthur Hayes, Murad’s Prediction For Meme Coins, AI & DeFi Coins For 2025 Expert Sees Bitcoin Dipping To $50K While Bullish Signs Persist Aptos Leverages Chainlink To Enhance Scalability and Data Access Bitcoin Could Rally to $80,000 on the Eve of US Elections Sonic Now ‘Golden Standard’ of Layer-2s After Scaling Transactions to 16,000+ per Second, Says Andre Cronje Institutional Investors Go All In on Crypto as 57% Plan to Boost Allocations as Bull Run Heats Up, Sygnum Survey Reveals Crypto’s Big Trump Gamble Is Risky Ripple-SEC Case Ends, But These 3 Rivals Could Jump 500x
Source link You may like
Uncategorized
John Reed Stark opposes regulatory reform at SEC crypto roundtable
John Reed Stark: one of crypto’s staunchest critics
Source link Uncategorized
South Korea to block non-compliant crypto exchanges
South Korean regulators eye crypto exchanges
South Korean exchanges face scrutiny
Source link Uncategorized
Bad news Bitcoin bulls, the long-hoped-for retail is already here: CryptoQuant
Source link SEC ‘Earnest’ About Finding Workable Crypto Policy, Commissioners Say at Roundtable
John Reed Stark opposes regulatory reform at SEC crypto roundtable
Investors Withdraw 360,000 Ethereum From Exchanges In Just 48 Hours – Accumulation Trend?
The FAIR Act Would Protect Bitcoin Holders
Russian National Set To Forfeit Nearly $23,000,000 After Agreeing To Plead Guilty to Crypto Market Manipulation
German regulator prohibits sales of Ethena USDe
US Treasury Lifts Sanctions Against Ethereum Mixer Tornado Cash
What Would Pi Coin Price Look Like if Pi Network Reaches XRP Market Cap?
SUI Drops 5.1% as Index Trades Lower From Thursday
South Korea to block non-compliant crypto exchanges
1.5M Holders, 10M Blocks on Shibarium
Pakistan Plans To Legalise Bitcoin And Crypto
‘This Is a Good Sign’: Crypto Analyst Says Bitcoin at a Key Inflection Point, Unveils Breakout Targets for BTC
Meteora shares two proposals on MET token allocation
Trump Aides Look To Reform USAID With Blockchain For ‘Transparency’: Report
Arthur Hayes, Murad’s Prediction For Meme Coins, AI & DeFi Coins For 2025
Expert Sees Bitcoin Dipping To $50K While Bullish Signs Persist
Aptos Leverages Chainlink To Enhance Scalability and Data Access
Bitcoin Could Rally to $80,000 on the Eve of US Elections
Sonic Now ‘Golden Standard’ of Layer-2s After Scaling Transactions to 16,000+ per Second, Says Andre Cronje
Institutional Investors Go All In on Crypto as 57% Plan to Boost Allocations as Bull Run Heats Up, Sygnum Survey Reveals
Crypto’s Big Trump Gamble Is Risky
Ripple-SEC Case Ends, But These 3 Rivals Could Jump 500x
Has The Bitcoin Price Already Peaked?
A16z-backed Espresso announces mainnet launch of core product
Xmas Altcoin Rally Insights by BNM Agent I
Blockchain groups challenge new broker reporting rule
Trump’s Coin Is About As Revolutionary As OneCoin
The Future of Bitcoin: Scaling, Institutional Adoption, and Strategic Reserves with Rich Rines
Is $200,000 a Realistic Bitcoin Price Target for This Cycle?
Trending