Connect with us

Technology

Apple Teasing Home Robots? Top Analyst Predicts Surprise for iPhone Giant

Published

on


Rumors that Apple is developing humanoid robots have begun to circulate again after Apple analyst at TF International Securities, Ming-Chi Kuo, tweeted Wednesday that the world’s largest company is exploring humanoid and non-humanoid robots for its smart home ecosystem.

Though chatter about Apple’s robotics ambitions intensified after Apple CEO Tim Cook tweeted Wednesday that people should “get ready to meet the newest member of the family” at an Apple launch event next week, hardly anyone believes the company will be introducing a humanoid robot. Most speculation points to a new rendition of the compact iPhone SE.

Still, Kuo, who is known for his accurate predictions regarding Apple’s product roadmap—often based on insider information from Asian supply chain sources—excited speculation with his tweet.

“These products are still in the early proof-of-concept stage internally,” Kuo wrote. “While the industry debates the merits of humanoid vs. non-humanoid designs, supply chain checks indicate Apple cares more about how users build perception with robots than their physical appearance.”

The push to develop humanoid robots accelerated in 2024, with companies like Tesla, Figure, Nvidia, Agility Robotics, and Boston Dynamics introducing robots designed for human-centric workplaces. (According to a recent report, Meta is even making significant investments in humanoid robotics.)

The rapid advancements in AI and robotics have led to bold predictions, including by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who speculated in October that robots could outnumber humans by 2040, potentially surpassing 10 billion in just fifteen years.

Despite these bold predictions, even Kuo noted that the timetable for a proof-of-concept design varies, and that Apple’s robot production is unlikely to start before 2028.

“Many projects never progress beyond proof-of-concept,” Kuo wrote. “The Apple Car is probably the most notable example of a project that got stuck at this stage.”

This is not the first time that pundits have suggested that Apple might be introducing a robot to its product lineup. And clearly Apple, which produced a TV series featuring a very Apple-like home robot, isn’t exactly tamping down speculation.

Sunny
A still from “Sunny” on Apple TV. Image: Apple

But what form its first offering might take was hotly debated. Indeed, Kuo noted that Apple used the term “anthropomorphic” instead of “humanoid,” suggesting that perhaps the company’s robot roadmap would launch with something that performed human chores without looking like Sunny.

“Apple execs are trained on the customer journey,” futurist and founder of the Unaligned Newsletter, Robert Scoble, told Decrypt. “We don’t have robots in our homes, and they know we aren’t ready to have a humanoid robot in ours yet, so they will start with a variety of more specific, constrained robots to get us used to them.”

While Scoble is skeptical of Apple’s ability to lead in AI and robotics, he suggested that the company’s robotic lamp, featured in a paper by Apple’s Machine Learning Research division in January, could be a stepping stone toward larger ambitions in humanoid robotics. (See video at the bottom of page.)

“If done well, and it looks like it is, it will help consumers grow comfortable with Apple as a robotics company,” he said.

Other robotics experts pointed out that, Boston Dynamics videos notwithstanding, the field has a long way to go before humanoid robots are ready for prime time.

“We’re still in the stage of making these robots perceive the environment and act like humans,” Professor of Computer Science at USC and co-founder of Sahara AI, Sean Ren, told Decrypt. “The intellectual abilities of thinking and then making decisions is at a similar level to ChatGPT.”

Phil Elmer-Dewitt, who runs the popular Apple Blog Apple 3.0, went even further: “If Apple markets a humanoid robot in 2028—or even 2038—I’ll eat my hat.”

Edited by Andrew Hayward

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

Technology

Filmmakers Bet on Web3 to Fix Hollywood Film Financing

Published

on



Cutter Hodierne knew the odds were against him. As an independent filmmaker trying to secure funding for “Cold Wallet,” a crypto thriller about a heist gone wrong, he faced the usual hurdles—hesitant investors, an unpredictable industry, and a financing system that favored big studios over fresh voices.

“In Hollywood’s centralized model, breaking in is difficult,” he said. “You never know if you met the right person, if your script was overlooked, or if your work is truly considered.”

So instead of taking the traditional route, he turned to the decentralized film industry. Often referred to as Film3, it leverages blockchain technology, community voting, and cryptocurrency to fund movies, and television series. Unlike the traditional Hollywood system, which relies on centralized studios, agents, and intermediaries, Film3 lets filmmakers connect directly with their audiences and financing.

Hodierne put 10 minutes of his film up on the Decentralized Pictures website for review, where a community of producers, writers, investors, and film buffs got a look at his sizzle reel. In exchange for reviewing the clip, they earned $FILM, Decentralized Pictures’ token, which the studio says is “fuel for the platform. Users can stake them on their favorite projects, use them to pay others to review their own submissions (as a rewards pool), or simply purchase entry vouchers to pay for application fees for various creative financing rewards.”

One reviewer in particular was especially struck by the clip: “Steven Soderbergh, the king of the heist genre, gave us his blessing,” said Hodierne.

Soderbergh invested in the film, and Decentralized Pictures followed on with a grant, giving “Cold Wallet” enough money to make Hodierne’s movie. Now screening as a “Steven Soderbergh Presents” project, the movie is at select theaters and available for rent or purchase on Apple and Amazon Prime Video, and has garnered respectable reviews.

“Hopefully, it connects with viewers,” Hodierne said. “What excites me most is that you can rent and buy it on-chain with crypto—it’s highly appropriate.”

It’s another big step in the journey of the dominant studios in the Film3 movement, Decentralized Pictures and Gala Films, which have more than 60 movies and TV series in the works.

“We’re building the studio of the future,” said Decentralized Pictures co-founder Roman Coppola, a member of the Coppola filmmaking family. “At our company, American Zoetrope, and in my dad’s work, we value community and a cafe culture where people come together, share ideas, and compare notes.”

Coppola and others pointed out that just as important as community participation is the decentralized funding model that can support filmmakers, particularly those with distinctive voices and meaningful stories to tell, by allowing them to bypass industry hierarchies.

“The term we’ve been using—DeFiFi, decentralized film finance—represents a shift in film funding,” Stacy Spikes, co-founder of movie subscription platform MoviePass said during an interview with Decrypt at ETH Denver. “Distribution companies will still be needed to push films into the marketplace, but until now, back-end participation wasn’t possible. With smart contracts, it is.”

The idea is already gaining traction. In 2024, Film3 made history when actress Mena Suvari earned a Primetime Emmy nomination for her role in “RZR,” a sci-fi series created by David Bianchi’s Exertion3 Films in collaboration with the blockchain-powered streaming platform Gala Film.

Spikes likened the potential of decentralized filmmaking to past independent and genre film movements.

“If you go with the community—particularly black and brown communities or genre films—Web3 is a great place to tap into,” Spikes said. “I feel that people who were hesitant to invest will now be more likely to do so because they know they’ll get their money back.”

Hodierne also noted that by eliminating distributors and sales agents, all proceeds go directly to the filmmakers and Decentralized Pictures, allowing them to reinvest in independent artists and future projects.

“As a filmmaker, I’ve seen how centralized and fickle the industry is. This shift is a big deal, especially as streaming platforms pay artists less while struggling themselves,” he said. “It’s an exciting convergence for films, and for ‘Cold Wallet,’ a crypto thriller, this feels like the perfect first step in opening that door.”

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Continue Reading

Adoption

Crypto finally dropped its ‘bros’ era

Published

on


Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

One of the most intriguing aspects of crypto is its sense of anonymity. Bitcoin (BTC), for example, was created in 2008 by an unknown figure using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, and to this day, the true identity of its inventor remains unknown. The veil of anonymity has allowed users to create distinct identities through wallet addresses, adding an extra layer of privacy and discretion to transactions. 

This concept of openness and universal access is one of the core promises of digital currencies, allowing anyone with internet access to engage, regardless of their financial history or background. However, even though the ethos of crypto promotes inclusivity, the reality hasn’t always reflected this. 

The early days of crypto were defined by the archetype “crypto bros,” referring to a specific demographic of young, tech-savvy men who influenced the industry’s direction. Their influence extended to the design of projects, development of key protocols, and framing of the culture surrounding digital assets. 

However, as the industry matured and evolved, efforts were made to reflect and include more female voices. This shift helped address the imbalance between gender representation, bringing new perspectives into the industry. 

A 2024 study revealed that over 560 million cryptocurrency owners exist globally, with 61 percent identifying as male and 39 percent as female. This marks an increase from the previous year, when the global total was 420 million, with 37 percent of owners being female, signaling a positive shift. 

Crypto finally dropped its ‘bros’ era and made way for a new, inclusive chapter | Opinion - 1
Cryptocurrency owners worldwide | Source: Triple A

In response to this trend, organizations have emerged to address crypto’s gender imbalances. Conferences and events once primarily targeted toward the male-dominated demographic have changed to allow women to step into the space and take the lead.

The Association for Women in Cryptocurrency, or AWC, for example, was founded in 2022 as a platform for women looking to enhance their knowledge and education in crypto. Led by Amanda Wick, AWC hosts various events, like webinars and in-person meetups, where women can learn from industry experts and connect with mentors who can guide them and help them discover new career opportunities. 

Recently, Binance shared that it will offer global programs exclusively for women through its Binance Academy platform in honor of International Women’s Day. The events will be held across five continents at 11 venues to help women ease their way into the industry.

While women have made significant strides in the DeFi space, now accounting for 40 percent of Binance’s workforce, leadership positions have been predominantly held by men. Despite this, several women have established themselves as leaders in the space.

Perianne Boring, for instance, is the founder and CEO of the blockchain advocacy group The Digital Chamber, working alongside Congress and the government to promote and regulate blockchain technology. Her leadership role has made her an advocate for adopting blockchain technologies, as she has become a well-known voice in the space discussing the future of finance. In December, President Trump also considered Boring as a potential CFTC chair. 

Another established female leader in the space is Joanna Liang, the founding partner of Jsquare, a tech-focused investment firm specializing in blockchain and web3. With a previous background as CIO at Digital Finance Group (DFG), a global Venture Capital firm focusing on crypto projects, Liang recently launched Jsquare’s latest fund, the Pioneer Fund. The fund has successfully raised $50 million in capital, making its first investment in the startup MinionLabs. The fund will focus on emerging technologies in the crypto space, including PayFi, real-world assets (RWAs), and consumer apps. 

Laura Shin is also a prominent name in crypto and is recognized as one of the first mainstream media reporters to cover cryptocurrency full-time. She is the author of the book, ‘The Cryptopians: Idealism, Greed, Lies, and the Making of the First Big Cryptocurrency Craze,’ and the host of the podcast Unchained. Laura has shared her expertise at events such as TEDx San Francisco and the International Monetary Fund. 

Over the past 16 years, women have been instrumental in helping legitimize crypto assets throughout the financial landscape. Their contributions have spanned various sectors in the ecosystem, helping shift the narrative around crypto from a niche, speculative asset to a more widely recognized and accepted financial tool.



Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Solana May Soon Get a Major Change—Here’s Why Builders Are Butting Heads Over SIMD-0228

Published

on



A new Solana proposal aims to change the frequency at which new tokens are generated on the prominent blockchain—and the suggested changes are generating serious debate ahead of the imminent vote.

The proposal, also known as SIMD-0228, looks to move from fixed-rate token emissions to a programmatic, “market-based emission” schedule that is based on staking participation rate. 

In other words, instead of decreasing Solana inflation based on a fixed, time-based schedule, SIMD-0228 proposes that Solana inflation dynamically changes based on network activity.

“The [current] mechanism is not aware of network activity, nor does it incorporate that to determine the emission rate. Simply put, it’s ‘dumb emissions,’” reads the proposal. “Given Solana’s thriving economic activity, it makes sense to evolve the network’s monetary policy with ‘smart emissions.’”

The proposal’s authors—Multicoin Capital’s Tushar Jain and Vishal Kankani, and Max Resnick, lead economist at Solana-focused R&D firm Anza—believe that so-called smart emissions would benefit the network and stakers by reducing inflation, spurring DeFi usage, reducing sell pressure, and improving the narrative around its existing inflation.

Notable Solana builders and personalities, including Solana Labs co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko, have signaled support for the proposal as well.

“The counter arguments to 228 are pretty bad because the cost of inflation is something on the order of […] $1-2 billion per year,” Yakovenko posted on X (formerly Twitter).

Helius Labs CEO Mert Mumtaz added that the “strongest argument for 228 is that it incentivizes and speeds up the timeline towards a network centered on real economic value.” That line of thinking was echoed by Placeholder VC partner Chris Burniske as well. 

“I’m in favor of SIMD-228,” Burniske said on X. “In the long run, real yield comes from what the demand-side leaks to the supply-side, and inflation is just a bootstrapping mechanism to get to that place.” 

But not all of the Solana community is ready to accept the proposal, which has been modified in the last two months based on feedback. As the proposal inches closer to a vote, some builders have taken aim at elements they believe will negatively impact the ecosystem.

One such dissenting opinion comes from SolBlaze.org, a Solana network validator that will have the option to vote on the proposal.

The validator added that the goal of lowering inflation “sounds good in theory,” but is a “terrible idea,” citing that SIMD-0228 will “drastically decrease” the amount of Solana tokens staked. Given that view, they believe it will threaten decentralization and the security of the network while impacting Solana’s DeFi protocols, which rely on staking rewards. 

“DeFi is what powers Solana adoption, and regular users should care about that if they want Solana to succeed,” a SolBlaze representative told Decrypt when asked why the average Solana participant should care about SIMD-0228. 

Others, including Solana Foundation President Lily Liu, have spoken out against the proposal. 

“[SIMD-0228] is too, too half-baked,” posted Liu. She signaled support for fixed rates, which she called “not dumb and arbitrary,” citing that predictability is valuable in capital markets.

“No on the proposal before us,” she said, instead suggesting an extension so the proposal can be adjusted to incorporate other features. 

Voting on SIMD-0228 is expected to start Friday evening during Solana Epoch 753, which is estimated to arrive around 8:30pm ET according to timetracking from Solscan. SolBlaze expects a “close vote” and is using the remaining hours to whip up support against the bill.

“Since it needs two-thirds of the vote to pass,” they told Decrypt, “there’s still a chance that enough people can come together to stop the proposal.”

Edited by Andrew Hayward

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon