Connect with us

DeFi

Usual Protocol activates revenue switch amid redeem function debate

Published

on


Can Usual’s revenue switch deliver on its promises amid growing concerns?

The Revenue Switch, a mechanism designed to distribute 100% of Usual’s (USUAL) protocol revenue to USUALx stakers, has been launched by the USUAL token and USD0 stablecoin ecosystem creators. While the initiative marks a significant step forward for decentralized finance, its debut is accompanied by ongoing community concerns about recent changes to the protocol’s redeem function.

Activated on Jan. 13, 2025, the Revenue Switch enables USUALx stakers to receive protocol-generated revenue, estimated at $5 million per month, directly in USD0. This mechanism links token value to actual earnings, aiming to incentivize long-term staking and support sustainable protocol growth.

As of Jan. 14, 2025, the USUAL token is trading at $0.5319, with a market capitalization of $275.68 million and a 24-hour trading volume of $194.6 million. Approximately 36.53% of the token supply is staked, offering an annual yield of 275%, 42% in USD0 rewards, and 233% in USUAL.

Usual Protocol activates revenue switch amid redeem function debate - 1
USUAL 1D chart | Source: CoinmarketCap

Despite the excitement surrounding the Revenue Switch, the protocol has faced criticism over its decision to update the redeem function for USD0 stablecoins. The new feature allows for temporary suspension of redemptions under specific conditions, such as during periods of market volatility or liquidity constraints. While USUAL has clarified that this change is intended to maintain stability in extreme scenarios, it has raised concerns about the concentration of control and potential implications for decentralization.

The introduction of the Revenue Switch and adjustments to the redeem function form part of USUAL’s broader strategy to secure its position as a leading DeFi protocol. The Revenue Switch aims to enhance the utility of USUAL tokens, stabilize returns for stakers, and provide a transparent mechanism for revenue distribution. USUAL has also indicated plans to refine its model in the coming months, incorporating advanced staking and governance frameworks inspired by the “veModel” used in other DeFi projects.

As USUAL navigates these developments, the success of the Revenue Switch may serve as a proof of concept for revenue-based tokenomics, potentially influencing future practices in the sector. At the same time, the protocol’s response to community concerns will be closely watched, as it could impact trust and adoption in an increasingly competitive DeFi ecosystem.





Source link

cryptocurrency

Solv Protocol announces solvBTC. BERA to power BTC yield on Berachain

Published

on



Binance-backed Bitcoin staking platform Solv Protocol has introduced the SolvBTC.BERA vault as it looks to unlock the yield-generation market on Berachain.

Solv Protocol announced SolvBTC.BERA on Jan. 13, noting that the deposit vault integrates Bitcoin (BTC) holders into Berachain’s decentralized finance ecosystem. The protocol aims to provide fresh yield-generation opportunities for Bitcoin holders on Berachain, an Ethereum Virtual Machine-compatible blockchain that uses a proof-of-liquidity consensus mechanism.

Users will be able to earn yield on their assets by depositing Bitcoin or Bitcoin-equivalent assets such as SolvBTC, SolvBTC.BBN, wrapped Bitcoin, or Coinbase wrapped Bitcoin into the SolvBTC.BERA vault. The launch opens up multi-layered yield-generation strategies within the Berachain ecosystem.

To attract early users, Solv Protocol launched the Boyco pre-deposit campaign, an incentive program that will reward early participants upon launch.

Users will see their assets deployed on seven different yield layers. It includes Solv Season 2, Babylon, Berachain rewards, Kodiak, Dolomite and Goldilocks. Kodiak is a liquidity hub on Berachain,while Dolomite is a decentralized money market fund and DEX platform.

Notably, funds deposited in SolvBTC.BERA will be subject to a 90-day lockup period starting from the Berachain mainnet launch.

Berachain’s ecosystem taps into a tri-token model, with BERA the native gas token and HONEY the native stablecoin.

The stablecoin’s issuance fees go to BGT holders – BGT is Berachain’s primary reward and governance token. BERA and HONEY tokens are both tradable. However, BGT is a non-liquid and non-transferable token.



Source link

Continue Reading

DeFi

Red-Hot DeFi Platform Usual Faces Backlash as Protocol Update Triggers Sell-Off

Published

on



Usual Protocol, an up-and-coming decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol that has seen a remarkable rise over the past months, faced community backlash on Friday after a tweak in the protocol’s yield-generating token triggered a sell-off on secondary markets.

Amid the turmoil, the protocol’s USD0++ token, which represents a locked-up – or staked – version of its $1-anchored stablecoin USD0, fell briefly below 90 cents from $1 on decentralized marketplace Curve. The protocol’s governance token, USUAL, plummeted as much as 17% through the day before recovering some of the losses.

The selloff was caused by a change in the redemption mechanism of USD0++ token introduced by the team on Thursday that caught investors and liquidity providers off-guard.

By design, USD0 is backed by short-term government securities to keep its price at $1. Stakers on Usual receive USD0++ that comes with a four-year lock-up period, meaning that investors are locking up their funds without being able to redeem in exchange for rewards earned in the form of the protocol’s USD0 and USUAL tokens. Yield farmers rushed in, catapulting the protocols total value locked (TVL), a key DeFi metric, to $1.87 billion earlier this week from less than $300 million in October.

However, the new feature called “dual-path exit” will allow investors to redeem the locked-up tokens early at a 0.87 USD0 floor price, or at par, by giving up a part of the rewards earned, calling the 1:1 exchange rate into question.

The abrupt implementation drew criticism across DeFi users for changing the design without warning. In certain liquidity pools, the token’s price was hardcoded to worth $1, causing havoc among borrowers and liquidity providers.

“Did they just allow degens to jump in at 1:1 and then rug the USD0++?,” prominent DeFi analyst Ignas said in an X post. “They pushed for the largest USD0/USD0++ pool on Curve knowing all well that USD0++ shouldn’t trade at 1:1.”

“DeFi continues learning the most important truth about pegs: a peg is a story about why two things that are not the same are interchangeable for each other,” noted Patrick McKenzie, advisor to payments firm Stripe.

The Usual team said in a statement that the design change with the early unstaking mechanism was communicated in advance from October. The protocol will also activate the revenue switch starting on Monday and start distributing the protocol’s earnings to governance token holders who stake their coin for longer-term (USUALx).

“The current situation regarding USD0++ stems from a misunderstanding of the protocol’s mechanisms along with a communication that should have been better articulated,” the statement reads. “We apologize and we’ll continue to do our best to communicate transparent information to users.”

The episode is another lesson for crypto investors about the potential risks of DeFi products that entice users with high-yields via token incentives and rewards flywheels.

“Users who are taking risk need to know what the exact rules are and be able to trust that they won’t change, otherwise it can result in market panic,” Rob Hadick, general partner at venture capital firm Dragonfly, told CoinDesk. “We should be thankful this happened now, before the protocol became a risk to the broader DeFi ecosystem.”

Still, USD0++ traded recently at 0.91 USD0 in the Curve pool, while the protocol’s total value locked, a key DeFi metric, dropped below $1.6 billion.





Source link

Continue Reading

Borrowing

Why You May Want To Redeem Your Bitcoin From THORChain's Lending Service

Published

on


Follow Frank on X.

Two days ago, the atebites X account pointed out that THORChain’s lending service currently has nowhere near enough bitcoin to repay its creditors.

As of the time of the post, the total amount of bitcoin to be repaid to depositors was 1,604, while the lending pool only had 592 bitcoin in it.

As Lava founder Shehzan Maredia explained in a post on X, when you borrow on THORChain, they sell the bitcoin you put up as collateral for their own token, RUNE. When you repay your loan, they sell the RUNE for bitcoin to give you back your collateral.

The actual mechanics of how this works are a bit more complex and are detailed on THORChain’s website.

See screenshots from the website below:

The primary issue in this scenario is that half of the value borrowed in U.S. dollar denominations was borrowed when bitcoin traded at significantly lower prices than that at which bitcoin trades today, according to atebites.

This means that for THORChain to meet its current demands, it will need to mint upwards of 24 million RUNE (as of January 8). While this would only be about 8% of the circulating supply of RUNE, it would lead to a reduction in the price of the asset, which would give THORChain even less purchasing power as they try to buy bitcoin back on behalf of their creditors.

If traders were to start shorting RUNE on top of this, THORChain’s ability to purchase the required amount of bitcoin to redeem its creditors would diminish even further.

This could lead to something akin to the Terra/Luna death spiral we saw in 2022.

With that said, prominent supporter of the project Erik Voorhees shared that THORChain’s lending service is operating as it was intended to and that there is no foreseeable danger.

A core developer for THORChain that goes by the name Nine Realms on X also made the case that THORChain is resilient:

While it surely isn’t a given that this situation will end in disaster, you may want to redeem the bitcoin you’ve put up as collateral via THORChain’s lending service just in case.

This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon