crypto custody
UK-based Copper adds custody, staking support for MINA
Published
4 weeks agoon
By
adminDigital assets custody and collateral management provider Copper now offers custody and staking support for Mina Protocol.
Copper.co announced its support for Mina Protocol (MINA) on Aug. 21, noting that support for the zero-knowledge blockchain platform’s native token expands digital asset options for institutional investors.
The integration will allow eligible clients to participate in the Mina Protocol ecosystem through Copper’s infrastructure.
Targeting institutional investors
Founded in 2018, Copper is a platform that seeks to offer institutional investors access and exposure to the digital assets market. The platform provided an MPC wallet and launched its off-exchange settlement solution, ClearLoop, in 2020.
ClearLoop allows users to manage digital asset collateral and settle trades across major crypto exchanges without moving assets off Copper’s wallet.
According to the London-based company, adding MINA staking allows for increased adoption of ZK technology.
“The addition of Copper’s custody solution gives professional and institutional entities more options to diversify their crypto participation with MINA. We hope that it will also raise awareness of institutional use cases for ZK technology, such as zk-KYC credentials that help address compliance without sacrificing user privacy,”
Kurt Hemecker, chief executive officer of Mina Foundation
Copper co-founder and chief executive Dmitry Tokarev commented that crypto and blockchain are at a “pivotal moment for institutional adoption.”
Tokarev added that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of Ethereum ETFs in May and launch of trading in July has accelerated interest. As a result, the ecosystem is seeing increased demand for reliable tools through which institutional investors can gain exposure to cryptocurrencies.
Copper’s recent partnerships
Copper recently partnered with Hedera (HBAR) to expand institutional access to the proof-of-stake network’s native token. The integration allows investors to leverage Copper Connect and Hedera protocols such as SaucerSwap to participate in the HBAR and Hedera Token Service utility.
Copper expanded its custody and staking service to Internet Computer (ICP) in July.
Source link
You may like
Hut 8 and BITMAIN To Launch Next-Generation ASIC Bitcoin Miner with Liquid-to-Chip Cooling
German Government Shuts Down 47 Exchanges, Says They’re Tied To ‘Illegal Activity’
Toncoin, Intel Markets and Ethereum
Whale Dumps Entire PEPE, FLOKI, and WLD Holdings, What’s Next For These Assets?
Nervos Network Bulls Add More Profits To Their Wallets With Gambling Token Mpeppe
Celebrating 10 Years of the Hardware Wallet Revolution
crypto custody
Centralizing SaaS wallets: Killing autonomy for the sake of convenience?
Published
2 weeks agoon
September 6, 2024By
adminDisclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.
Traditional software-as-a-service-based multi-party computation custodians are often seen as the “convenient” solution in the crypto universe, managing a staggering portion of decentralized assets. But the reality is that the convenience quickly wears off, revealing a host of limitations, unexpected risks, and challenges as you dive deeper into the technological aspects of protecting digital currency.
Regardless of your decentralization versus centralization stance, it is essential to recognize that the appearance of private key control can be skewered by a lack of control in policy governance and infrastructure you do not run yourself.
The rise and risks of SaaS-based MPC wallets
The emergence of SaaS-based MPC wallets has significantly impacted the crypto landscape, allowing businesses to manage digital assets with convenience and perceived security. These wallets are typically provided by tech companies that are currently positioning themselves more and more as non-custodial service providers. However, despite this label, these solutions still require users to trust a centralized party to coordinate signing and key generation securely, placing them high on the custody spectrum in terms of control over assets.
This reliance on a centralized service provider creates a situation where control and security are not entirely in the hands of the institution using the service. While these tech providers do not operate as traditional third-party custodians, such as BitGo or Anchorage—highly regulated and offer fully managed custodial services—they still introduce a central point of control and potential vulnerability. As used by both SaaS-based providers and traditional custodians, MPC technology involves splitting cryptographic keys required for transactions into multiple parts distributed among various parties to enhance security.
However, in the case of SaaS-based solutions, the centralization of these services within a few dominant players introduces new risks. One of them is that these providers become attractive targets for hackers due to their significant control over many clients’ assets, creating a vulnerability similar to that of centralized exchanges. Two, the concentration of control in these SaaS-based models not only increases security risks but indirectly limits the autonomy of crypto businesses.
By relying on an external provider to manage critical aspects of digital asset security, institutions may find themselves constrained in managing policies, procedures, and the overall governance of their assets. This centralization stands in contrast to the decentralized ethos of the crypto industry, where individual sovereignty over digital assets is paramount.
The challenges of dependency and trust in MPC custodians
While MPC wallets often claim to be non-custodial because the institution holds part of the key, the reality is far more complex: the heavy dependency on third-party vendors for day-to-day operations, security, and service availability introduces significant risks. Despite the customer institution holding a key share, all other components affecting the use or potential misuse of key shares remain under the vendor’s control. This setup creates vulnerabilities around key signing integrity but, even more importantly, introduces friction into the customer experience, an operational risk that should be accounted for. For instance, any policy change can take up to a few weeks if it is not prioritized by the vendor, posing significant delays and operational inefficiencies.
Analyze this potential impact further. MPC wallets can have longer transaction times, and their reliance on vendors for routine account changes and maintenance can be problematic. If a team member leaves, revoking their access is done at the vendor’s tempo. It can take considerable time, resulting in a period where the security of assets may be compromised. Additionally, service downtimes for maintenance during business hours can disrupt operations. Plus, in disaster scenarios, asset recovery can take up to 48 hours—a period that is far too long for any organization dealing with high-value transactions. These operational dependencies can be highly inconvenient. Ultimately, they pose security risks that contradict what decentralization stands for—namely, running your own wallet infrastructure.
For regulated financial institutions or firms with stringent security requirements, these dependencies are deal-breakers. That’s because the operational risks and costs associated with relying on third-party MPC wallet solutions are often unacceptable to internal risk teams. These teams are unable to get comfortable with the inherent uncertainties and potential for delayed response times that these products entail. Consequently, many MPC wallet solutions fail to pass the rigorous scrutiny of risk assessments, preventing them from being adopted by institutions that require the highest levels of security and operational control.
A new paradigm for crypto custody
If the incumbent SaaS solutions represent the ‘trust us’ model, the ideal solution should transition towards a ‘trust but verify’ approach and, ultimately, a ‘never trust, always verify’ model. This shift empowers customers to partially or fully host the software, granting them control and ownership of critical IT infrastructure. By eliminating the opaque operations inherent in black box SaaS solutions, institutions not only mitigate operational risks hidden in the friction of operating in a third party’s sandbox but also enable more agile and flexible infrastructure management.
This enhanced control supports better risk management and allows institutions to adapt quickly to market demands, ultimately driving revenue growth and positively impacting the bottom line.
A practical solution integrates critical management and policy controls into a comprehensive platform, allowing institutions to manage their digital assets within a zero-trust security framework. This architecture continuously validates every interaction, eliminating implicit trust and enhancing security. By adopting a service-oriented architecture, institutions can tailor the system to their unique requirements, ensuring scalability, high performance, and robust security.
Current market offerings, which rely entirely on SaaS-based MPC wallets, place undue trust in vendors who control all components, including cryptographic processes, keys, policies, and transaction data. By moving towards solutions that enable institutions to own and control critical parts of their digital asset infrastructure, the industry can mitigate risks and reduce vulnerabilities while operating more closely to the principles of decentralization. Such a transformation is essential for fostering trust and security in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape.
Now is the time for institutions to take control of their policies. By adopting models that provide partial or complete control over key management and policy enforcement, institutions can better align with the correct treatment and oversight of service providers or outsourcing arrangements. This paradigm shift is essential for the industry’s future, and it’s something that is poised to safeguard crypto’s core values while paving the way for continued innovation and trust.
Haden Patrick
Haden Patrick is the director of business operations of Cordial Systems, a provider of institutional-grade self-custody software using a zero-trust security model. Haden has executive experience in team leadership, engineering, and education originating from his 24-year career as a Naval Officer. After co-founding SoloKeys, the first open-source security key company, he managed projects connecting web3 to traditional finance at a cryptocurrency trading firm before joining Cordial Systems.
Source link
24/7 Cryptocurrency News
Custodia Bank Highlights Bitcoin Custody Shifting To US Banks
Published
2 months agoon
July 31, 2024By
adminIn a recent post on the X platform, Custodia Bank’s CEO has spotlighted the growing trend of Bitcoin custody moving to US banks. This shift is driven by the need for asset segregation and bankruptcy protection, which specialized charters like Wyoming’s SPDI offer.
Custodia Bank Highlights Crypto Shift From Exchanges to Banks
Custodia Bank and Kraken Bank claim to lead the transformation of Bitcoin custody. Custodia Bank CEO, in a recent post, emphasized that US banks are becoming preferred for Bitcoin custody due to legal protections.
Meanwhile, these banks provide superior security by segregating assets and ensuring bankruptcy remoteness. Wyoming’s SPDI bank charter anticipated this need, setting up a framework that crypto-native banks like Custodia and Kraken now utilize.
In addition, Kraken also highlighted its crypto custody services tailored for institutional clients in the US, UK, and Australia. They offer segregated assets, advanced controls, and industry-leading security measures. This shift signifies a growing trust in banks over traditional crypto exchanges for holding digital assets securely.
Also Read: Japanese Crypto Giant Bitbank Prepares To Go Public
Legal Protections and Institutional Appeal
Custodia Bank’s CEO pointed out that the legal protections offered by these specialized bank charters make them an attractive option. This shift is not just about security but also about compliance and trust. Institutions require robust legal frameworks to ensure their investments are safe and accessible.
The state-chartered banks in Wyoming are equipped to meet these demands with their cutting-edge regulatory standards. Besides, Kraken’s announcement of its qualified crypto custody solution further underscores this trend.
Meanwhile, they provide an institutional-grade custody service with segregated assets and state-of-the-art controls. This service appeals to clients in the US, UK, and Australia, offering them a regulated and secure way to manage their cryptocurrency assets. The focus on asset segregation ensures that institutional clients’ assets are kept separate from the bank’s, adding an extra layer of security.
However, the emphasis on cutting-edge controls and industry-revered security highlights the bank’s commitment to maintaining the highest standards in crypto custody. This approach not only enhances security but also builds confidence among institutional investors, who prioritize both safety and regulatory compliance.
Also Read: Fidelity Launches Bitcoin ETP On London Stock Exchange
Rupam Roy
Rupam, a seasoned professional with 3 years in the financial market, has honed his skills as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He finds joy in exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently working as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam’s expertise goes beyond conventional boundaries. His contributions encompass breaking stories, delving into AI-related developments, providing real-time crypto market updates, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam’s journey is marked by a passion for unraveling the intricacies of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Source link
Hut 8 and BITMAIN To Launch Next-Generation ASIC Bitcoin Miner with Liquid-to-Chip Cooling
German Government Shuts Down 47 Exchanges, Says They’re Tied To ‘Illegal Activity’
Toncoin, Intel Markets and Ethereum
Whale Dumps Entire PEPE, FLOKI, and WLD Holdings, What’s Next For These Assets?
Nervos Network Bulls Add More Profits To Their Wallets With Gambling Token Mpeppe
Celebrating 10 Years of the Hardware Wallet Revolution
FET price rises as CEX inflows rise ahead of Cudos merger vote
5 Crypto to Sell to Avoid Losses After Fed’s 50 bps Interest Rate Cut
Bitcoin on the Cusp of Breakout Into Parabolic Phase, Says Crypto Analyst – Here’s the Timeline
Germany's Commerzbank and DZ Bank To Offer Bitcoin and Crypto Trading
Hut 8 deepens Bitmain partnership with launch of new ASIC miner in 2025
Binance CEO Says Institutional Investors Grew 40% This Year
Solana’s New Phone Promises More for Less—And Already Seeing Huge Demand
Federal Reserve Cuts Interest Rates by 50 Basis Points to Address Economic Uncertainty
XRP, SOL stagnate as new rising altcoin seizes the moment with another ATH
Top Crypto News Headlines of The Week
Ethereum, Solana touch key levels as Bitcoin spikes
Bitcoin 20% Surge In 3 Weeks Teases Record-Breaking Potential
Bitcoin Open-Source Development Takes The Stage In Nashville
Ethereum Crash A Buying Opportunity? This Whale Thinks So
Why Did Trump Change His Mind on Bitcoin?
New U.S. president must bring clarity to crypto regulation, analyst says
Will XRP Price Defend $0.5 Support If SEC Decides to Appeal?
Shiba Inu Price Slips 4% as 3500% Burn Rate Surge Fails to Halt Correction
Citigroup Executive Steps Down To Explore Crypto
Bitcoin flashes indicator that often precedes higher prices: CryptoQuant
Crypto Market Movers: 5 Altcoins Making Waves This Bull Run
Dormant Bitcoin wallet from 2014 moves BTC worth $10.2m
Polygon on-chain activity spikes despite MATIC price dip
The Other Satoshis: Bitcoin's Most Important Early Contributors
Trending
- 24/7 Cryptocurrency News1 month ago
Top Crypto News Headlines of The Week
- Bitcoin2 months ago
Ethereum, Solana touch key levels as Bitcoin spikes
- Bitcoin2 months ago
Bitcoin 20% Surge In 3 Weeks Teases Record-Breaking Potential
- Opinion2 months ago
Bitcoin Open-Source Development Takes The Stage In Nashville
- Altcoins2 months ago
Ethereum Crash A Buying Opportunity? This Whale Thinks So
- Donald Trump2 months ago
Why Did Trump Change His Mind on Bitcoin?
- Price analysis1 month ago
Will XRP Price Defend $0.5 Support If SEC Decides to Appeal?
- News2 weeks ago
New U.S. president must bring clarity to crypto regulation, analyst says
✓ Share: