Elon Musk’s X is reportedly seeking a second chance to resume its services in Brazil, sparking discussions in the broader tech sector. According to sources with knowledge of the matter, the social media platform has requested the Supreme Court of Brazil to allow resume its services in the region. Notably, Elon Musk has recently been involved in a tussle with the country’s authority for putting a ban on its social media platform.

Meanwhile, it has also sparked discussions about whether the platform would be given a second chance to thrive in one of its largest markets.

Elon Musk’s X Seeks Brazil Entry Again

According to a recent Reuters report, Elon Musk’s X has asked the Brazil Supreme Court to grant him access to the region. The report, citing people with direct knowledge of the matter, has sparked discussions in the broader market about whether Brazil’s top court would give approval to the platform.

Meanwhile, X’s troubles in Brazil began in August when the platform failed to comply with court orders addressing hate speech moderation and the appointment of a local legal representative. This led to a complete shutdown of X’s services in the country.

However, Musk has openly criticized these court demands, labeling them as censorship. Despite that, the recent development indicates a surprising turn for X, shifting its stance. In other words, it signals that the platform is willing to comply with the court’s requirements now.

Meanwhile, X appointed Brazilian lawyer Rachel de Oliveira Conceição as its legal representative recently, signaling a step toward compliance. In addition, the platform has blocked nine accounts under investigation for hate speech and misinformation, addressing one of the major concerns raised by Brazilian authorities.

According to previous reports, X has also paid a fine of $3.31 million, which was previously imposed as part of the sanctions. This financial settlement has further fueled speculation about whether the Supreme Court will now grant Musk’s company a second chance.

Will Brazil Supreme Court Grant Approval?

The legal battle between Elon Musk’s X and Brazil’s authority has intensified over the recent months. Notably, the tensions peaked in August, when X withdrew from the country in response to what Musk deemed as “uncontrollable censorship” orders. This move has led to the freezing of X accounts, making headlines in the broader technology sector.

Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has gained notable traction amid the ongoing battle. Musk’s opposition to de Moraes’ orders gained public attention, as the tech mogul accused the judge of violating free speech rights.

In addition, Musk even launched an account on his platform, “The Alexander Files,” to highlight what he saw as abuses of power by the judge. Many now believe the recent payment of fines and blocking of accounts is an attempt to broker peace and restore X’s operations in the region.

While the Supreme Court has lifted some sanctions, it remains unclear whether this legal back-and-forth will fully resolve. If granted permission to resume services, X might have to navigate through Brazil’s stringent laws on misinformation and hate speech.

✓ Share:

Rupam Roy

Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam’s expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news.
Rupam’s career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.