Today, China announced that it will increase tariffs on the goods it ships to the United States from 34% to 84% in response to President Trump stating that he will raise tariffs on the goods the U.S. ships to China to 104%.

The increased Chinese tariffs on the U.S. will make it more costly for U.S.-based public Bitcoin mining companies to purchase ASICs (the premier machines used to mine bitcoin), the majority of which are produced in China.

And this will be largely beneficial for the health of the Bitcoin mining ecosystem.

As Troy Cross eloquently explained in “The Future OF Bitcoin Mining Is Distributed”, if one country controls too much of the Bitcoin hashrate, Bitcoin’s censorship resistance — one of its core value propositions — is put at risk.

In the article, Cross highlighted that if the majority of the Bitcoin network’s hashrate is not only produced in the U.S. but produced by American public mining companies, the U.S. government has more leverage to mandate that these companies only mine OFAC-compliant blocks.

For those who believe that these companies would push back or simply not follow such orders, please note that Marathon Digital Holdings, the largest publicly-traded Bitcoin mining company in the U.S., has already proven that it’s willing to comply with OFAC regulations.

The Bitcoin network has a higher likelihood of maintaining its censorship resistance when the hashrate is distributed globally.

As Cross mentioned in a recent interview (below), Bitcoin differs from other emerging technologies in that it does not benefit from one country controlling most of the industry around it.

The internet is at a crossroads. People are continuing to express their frustration and dissatisfaction with the internet—double that of what they felt 20 years ago—as centralized platforms are facing increasing scrutiny for their opaque algorithms, data exploitation, and bias in content curation.

Most online platforms today run on web2, where FAANG companies—Meta, formerly known as Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Alphabet, formerly known as Google—control the data, serve ads, and track users for profit. Users are ultimately the product, and while these companies have added billions in market cap by turning users into the product, this is far from the best model for creating a sustainable knowledge engine like the internet. Participants in the internet ecosystem are starting to wake up to the fact that this model doesn’t really work for anyone except those FAANG companies.

Nowhere are these problems more evident than in search. Search is one of the most fundamental activities on the internet and, thus, stands at the forefront of “gatekept content.” If the internet really is our collective knowledge engine, then search is the first step in acquiring that knowledge.

It is sometimes even the last and only step in using the internet to acquire knowledge, considering that the first result on a Google page has a clickthrough rate of over 25 percent and the tenth result, proportionately, only has a tenth of that. Presumably, a fraction of that fraction even makes it to the second page of results.

Now, consider Google’s prominent position in all of search. Even while Google’s search market share last year dropped below 90 percent for the first time in 10 years, it is still within the range of the popular vote total for a third-world dictator. So, the One True Result that has been served up by Google’s algorithm is getting a quarter of the traffic for the search engine that still holds somewhere in the area of 90 percent of the search engine market share. That’s a lot of opaque and centralized power centered in one private company.

Even while competitors like DuckDuckGo and Bing try to carve out some of their own market share by offering AI-powered search or increased privacy, as centralized companies, they fundamentally present the same problem Google does, without the market share. The integrity of our search results has never been more crucial, and we can’t leave it to web2 structures to be good custodians of that integrity, especially when the priorities of those structures to protect their users can turn on a dime.

The solution is here: Enter web3

How do we put how information is organized back into the hands of users, especially as the search engines promise to become even more inscrutable with the implementation of AI and the obscuring of sources?

One possible way to put that power back into the hands of users is what has thus far been built with web3. Web3 can allow us to build a decentralized, community-powered search engine while participating in a truly open and trustless search ecosystem. A decentralized node-powered ecosystem can ensure fair, unbiased, and censorship-resistant search results, free from the corporate agendas that have shaped traditional search engines.

Instead of relying on corporations, web3 platforms are permissionless, sovereign, and decentralized. They are powered by blockchain and smart contracts instead of centralized corporate servers that open users to vulnerabilities and data insecurity. Web3 gives users control back over their data, identity, and digital assets.

There are a host of other ways in which web3 can empower the user. These include self-sovereignty, permissionless control of assets without fear of confiscation, self-custodial staking and earning, access for the unbanked, peer-to-peer transfers, and, perhaps most important of all, that fundamental decentralization, which eliminates single points of failure while being resistant to manipulation.

There is also no behavioral profiling, no centralized control, and no data tracking. This means no censorship risk, no suppression of competing voices, and a search experience that respects user privacy.

Users must work to reclaim power

Search engines today function as gatekeepers of information, with centralized platforms deciding which content is amplified, suppressed, or monetized based on user profiles and corporate interests. Users deserve a fairer and ultimately better search experience, one where ranking algorithms are not influenced by personal data, past behavior or profit-driven agendas.

The problem is bound to get worse as the AI race heats up and companies look for new data sources on which to train these AIs. Whatever promises a centralized company might have once made to the user about not tracking or using data, again, these priorities can shift very quickly in something like an AI technology realignment. The beauty of web3 is that the structure of the technology itself prevents such exploitation. 

Web3 may seem abstract right now, but it’s not all that different from the kind of technical fluency users needed to acquire as they went from the personal computer to the networked personal computer of web2. Users essentially just have to trade out an encrypted password shared with a central web service (and who knows where else) for an encrypted wallet that only they can control and access. The benefits of full control over assets and data will far outweigh whatever stumbling blocks there are to this learning curve.

Users have shown that they are willing to trade a lot for convenience, but perhaps they’ve reached a breaking point in that bargain. Now is the time for web3 to take advantage.

Timothy Enneking

Timothy Enneking is the CEO of Presearch, a decentralized, privacy-focused, web3 search engine. He was initially invited to join the project seven years ago after he recommended it during a CNBC Asia interview on crypto, and he remained an advisor for four years. He rejoined Presearch in August 2023 when the founder invited him to become the CEO and bring the project to the next level. He is the founder and Principal of Digital Capital Management, LLC (“DCM”), which runs CAF 2017, a crypto trading fund. He is also the founder and managing partner of Psalion, which manages two venture capital funds and a yield farming operation. For nine years ending in June 2024, Mr. Enneking was the Chief Investment Officer of Mana Companies Asset Management, a medium-sized family office (which did not invest in crypto). Prior to those activities, Mr. Enneking founded and managed Tera Capital Fund, a fund of funds focused on Eastern Europe (established in 2004). Simultaneously, in 2013, he was engaged to manage the world’s first Bitcoin fund. Mr. Enneking also has extensive M&A experience, having completed more than 70 transactions with an aggregate transaction value of over US$12 billion. He speaks near-native French and Russian, as well as German. He has five university degrees, all in international business and law.

AI-generated avatars and virtual assistants will revolutionize our digital landscape, powering virtual influencers, workplace stand-ins, and immersive metaverse experiences. Yet, beneath this technological marvel lies a pressing question: who truly owns and controls your digital identity? The reality is stark—most AI avatars are tethered to centralized platforms where corporations hold dominion, exposing users to exploitation, financial fraud, and a profound loss of autonomy. As these digital personas become integral to our virtual lives, the need for a transformative solution has never been more urgent.

Decentralizing AI avatars through blockchain technology and smart contracts emerges as a vital antidote, promising to restore control to individuals in an increasingly virtualized world. The dangers of centralized systems are vividly demonstrated by high-profile abuses that have shaken public trust. In January 2024, a deepfake robocall mimicking U.S. President Joe Biden targeted New Hampshire voters, falsely urging Democrats to skip the primary in a bid to sway the 2024 election. This brazen act of manipulation, which prompted an FCC ruling to ban deepfake robocalls and ignited debates over AI regulation, exposed the fragility of centralized platforms that harbor the data fueling such scams.

The entertainment industry offers another stark warning. In early 2024, explicit deepfake images of Taylor Swift flooded social media, amassing over 45 million views before removal after a 17-hour delay. This incident laid bare the limitations of centralized content moderation, which often falters under pressure, leaving women and public figures disproportionately vulnerable to digital harm. The fallout was swift—Swift’s team condemned the breach, and platforms scrambled to respond, yet the delay highlighted a systemic failure to protect digital likenesses in real-time.

Additionally, Meta’s Oversight Board recently took up cases involving deepfake explicit imageries, noting inconsistent moderation practices— certain content was removed faster than others due to not passing specific community guidelines, highlighting inequities in centralized systems. These examples show how centralized avatar management leaves users powerless and unable to prevent misuse of their digital likeness.

Why AI avatars need to be decentralized

Centralized platforms trap users in ecosystems where their digital identities are subject to exploitation or sudden deactivation at corporate whim. This unchecked dominance shatters the vision of a user-empowered digital future, reducing individuals to mere cogs in a profit-driven machine. Decentralization flips this narrative, fostering self-sovereign identity where users hold the reins, owning and managing their avatars with confidence. 

By placing control in the hands of individuals, decentralized systems can curb corporate overreach, ensuring AI avatars reflect their creators’ intent rather than serve as tools for exploitation.

Blockchain-powered AI ownership

Blockchain technology stands as a beacon of hope against these escalating threats. Through on-chain verification, it forges an unalterable record of avatar ownership, forging a secure bond between digital identities and their rightful owners while decisively countering unauthorized deepfake abuse. 

This was painfully evident in February 2023, when a French interior designer fell pray in a romance scam: fraudsters wielded AI-generated images and messages to impersonate Brad Pitt, spinning a tale of a fabricated relationship and a fabricated cancer diagnosis that convinced her to part with €830,000—her life savings—before the deception unraveled. Such episodes unveil the dangers of centralized platforms, which hoard user data and become fertile ground for AI-driven fraud, eroding trust and inflicting devastating personal losses. Without a verifiable system to authenticate digital identities, AI-driven deception will only intensify. Users are left defenseless as deepfakes become more sophisticated and harder to detect. The challenge is clear: How can we secure digital avatars against misuse while ensuring individuals, not corporations, maintain control over their online presence?

Yet, blockchain’s potential extends further. Smart contracts bolster this framework by automating rights management, guaranteeing avatars operate with unwavering security and transparency while fortifying defenses against fraud. This comprehensive approach not only shields digital assets from theft but also alleviates the ethical and legal burdens intensified by centralized oversight, equipping users with verifiable dominion over their virtual selves.

A web3 future for AI avatars

Decentralized AI avatars can also drive a vibrant web3 economy, integrating into metaverses, digital workspaces, and decentralized social networks. These avatars can become dynamic assets—representing users in virtual worlds, facilitating remote collaboration, or enabling secure interactions online. Picture a musician selling a unique avatar on a decentralized marketplace or a professional using a blockchain-verified digital twin to authenticate their presence in a virtual meeting. This ecosystem thrives on user ownership, positioning decentralized AI avatars as a foundation for the next digital economy.

The drive to decentralize AI avatars is non-negotiable—centralized systems, exposed by explosive deepfake scandals and crumbling moderation, threaten to dismantle safety and freedom in an AI-drenched world. Blockchain carves a decisive path to empowerment, handing the reins of digital identity back to individuals, not corporate overlords. The clock is ticking: seize control of your digital destiny now, or watch it vanish into a dystopian abyss of corporate domination.

Roman Cyganov

Roman Cyganov is the founder and CEO of Antix, a company at the forefront of web3, AI, and gaming technologies. Recognized by OUTPUT as one of the Top 10 Global Talents, Roman has a rich history of driving technological innovation and redefining how businesses engage with digital audiences. Under his leadership, Antix has developed AIGE, a cutting-edge technology that crafts hyper-realistic AI-powered digital humans, revolutionizing client interactions in the digital space. Roman’s entrepreneurial journey includes co-founding VIVIX Inc., where he served as CCO before his pivotal role at Antix. His career is marked by a successful exit and numerous high-profile ventures that underscore his role as a serial entrepreneur leading the next wave of digital transformation.