Connect with us

Crypto scam

Are users paying for the exchange’s failures?

Published

on



Is WazirX prioritizing its own survival over user security with the “socialized loss strategy,” and how does this impact the Indian crypto community?

On July 18, WazirX, India’s largest crypto exchange, faced a severe cyber attack. Hackers targeted one of their multisig wallets and made off with over $230 million worth of digital assets. 

The attack saw the direct theft of 15,298 Ethereum (ETH), with the exploiter then swapping various tokens like Shiba Inu (SHIB), Polygon (MATIC), and Pepe Coin (PEPE) to gather a total of 59,097 ETH, impacting WazirX’s ability to maintain a 1:1 collateral with its assets.

Adding fuel to the fire, WazirX halted all trading activities as the prices on their platform crashed to levels far below those on other exchanges. Furthermore, WazirX has also frozen all withdrawals, both in crypto and INR, leaving customers unable to access their funds.

Given the scale of this incident, which affected 45% of user funds, the exchange’s trustworthiness, once boasted to over 15 million users, is now in serious doubt. To address this crisis, WazirX has proposed a controversial recovery plan. 

On July 27, they announced a “socialized loss strategy,” aiming to distribute the losses among users to maintain platform stability. Under this plan, users will have immediate access to only 55% of their assets, while the remaining 45% will be locked in Tether-equivalent tokens.

This move, intended to prevent disproportionate impacts on any single group, has stirred stark backlash across social media. Many users feel betrayed by what they perceive as a blatant disregard for their assets’ security and integrity. 

Let’s dive into the details and understand the public’s reaction to this contentious strategy.

Pick your poison, but you can’t cash out

WazirX’s controversial recovery plan, branded as the “socialized loss strategy,” has sparked heated debate among its users. 

According to correspondence shared with affected users, the exchange presented a poll offering two options to recover their stolen funds. 

“Option A” permits users to access 55% of their funds “for trading and deposits” but restricts withdrawals. This option also gives users priority in potential recovery proceeds. 

On the other hand, “Option B” allows users to withdraw 55% of their assets “in a staggered manner,” but with a lower priority in the recovery queue. 

In both scenarios, WazirX states that the remaining 45% of user assets will remain locked on the exchange as “USDT-equivalent tokens,” which would only be returned if the firm successfully recovers the stolen funds.

The value of the unlocked portfolio (55%) will be calculated based on average prices from CoinMarketCap and select global exchanges as of July 21, 2024, 8:30 PM IST. 

Registered users received an email with detailed instructions and a link to select their preferred option. The deadline for responses is August 3, 2024, at 07:00 AM IST.

However, this poll is not legally binding upon the users or WazirX. The final decision will be made after considering the poll results, ongoing investigations, the platform’s liquidity, and any evolving circumstances, the platform announced on July 29.

This plan has led to widespread outrage and skepticism. Many users perceive this strategy as a way for WazirX to avoid full responsibility for the losses. 

Moreover, the restriction on withdrawals, coupled with the non-binding nature of the poll, leaves users feeling that their assets are still at critical risk. 

WazirX’s recovery plan faces fierce backlash

The public backlash against WazirX’s controversial recovery plan has been swift and severe. 

Sumit Gupta, the co-founder and CEO of CoinDCX, was among the first prominent figures to criticize the exchange’s handling of the situation. 

He mentioned on X that the burden of losses should primarily fall on WazirX itself, using its own treasury and assets, rather than making customers bear a 45% loss. 

Gupta also pointed out that the poll options were framed to protect the business rather than its customers, calling the approach “utter nonsense.”

Brian Kuttikat, COO of KoinBX, expressed a similar sentiment in an exclusive conversation with crypto.news, citing WazirX’s strategy of “socializing losses” as highly controversial. 

He acknowledged the intentions behind the approach but questioned its effectiveness in offsetting the losses faced by affected users. 

Meanwhile, the call for justice has grown louder, with many users demanding strict intervention and criminal proceedings against WazirX and its head, Nischal Shetty. 

One user shared a letter addressed to a DCP officer, insisting on a CBI inquiry to determine whether the incident was a hack or an insider job. 

Further critiques of WazirX’s approach poured in from various quarters. 

Kashif Raza, another vocal critic, outlined several flaws in the proposed solution. Raza argued that the snapshot for asset valuation should have been taken before the hack, criticized the allocation and profit usage of WRX tokens, and questioned the fairness of penalizing users with non-stolen tokens. 

Raza also raised concerns about tax liabilities on top of user losses and demanded transparency regarding WazirX’s financials and profit usage to compensate victims.

The overarching sentiment is one of betrayal and frustration, with many questioning the fairness, legality, and transparency of the recovery plan. 

In the face of this backlash, Nischal Shetty, the head of WazirX, mentioned that the poll presented to users was a preliminary step to understand their opinions and is not legally binding. 

Shetty assured users that a feedback form would soon be launched to gather more ideas and that the team is considering all the feedback received to determine the next steps.

Take the taxes and stay quiet

India has emerged as a global leader in crypto adoption, topping Chainalysis’s Global Crypto Adoption Index in September 2023. However, this enthusiasm appears to be one-sided, with the government and regulators maintaining a conspicuous silence on the subject.

In the 2022 budget, the government introduced stringent income tax rules for crypto transfers, taxing any income earned from these transactions at a hefty 30%. No deductions are allowed, except for the cost of acquisition, and losses cannot be offset against other income or carried forward to future years. 

The irony is palpable: while the government is quick to tax crypto gains, it offers no safety net when things go awry.

Meanwhile, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has also been silent, with the last notable statement coming from Deputy Governor Shri T. Rabi Sankar in February 2022. 

In his speech, he mentioned crypto’s risks to the financial system, comparing them to speculative assets with no intrinsic value. He warned of the destabilizing effects they could have on monetary policy and financial stability.

This approach has created a precarious environment for investors. On one hand, they face high taxes and strict regulations; on the other, they receive no support or protection from the government during crises, such as the ongoing WazirX fiasco.

At this point, both WazirX and the government seem to have prioritized their own interests over those of individual investors. The lack of transparency and support from both parties has left investors feeling abandoned and betrayed.

As India continues to lead in crypto adoption, it is imperative for the government to engage more actively and constructively with the industry. Ignoring the issue is not a viable long-term strategy.





Source link

24/7 Cryptocurrency News

Binance Alerts Users To Malware Risks in Crypto Withdrawals

Published

on


Binance crypto exchange has issued a warning about an ongoing malware threat that manipulates cryptocurrency withdrawal addresses, posing significant financial risks to users. The exchange has observed an increase in such malicious activities, prompting a robust response to safeguard user transactions.

Binance Issues Alert on Malware Threats to Crypto Wallets

In a recent blog post, Binance detailed how the malware known as “Clipper” is affecting the crypto community. This malware intercepts and alters clipboard data to change cryptocurrency addresses copied by users during transactions. 

As a result, funds intended for legitimate recipients are misdirected to addresses controlled by attackers. The security team at Binance has enhanced monitoring to detect and prevent these alterations.

BinanceBinance
Binance

Furthermore, the company has committed to educating its users about recognizing and mitigating such threats. The exchange emphasizes the importance of verifying the authenticity of wallet addresses before executing transactions. It advises double-checking addresses manually and avoiding the use of clipboard for transactions when possible.

Enhanced Security Measures and User Guidance

In addition, Binance has implemented several security measures in response to the rising threat from malicious software. One primary strategy is the blacklisting of suspicious addresses identified as part of the scam. This preventive measure has thwarted numerous transactions that would have resulted in unauthorized withdrawals.

The cryptocurrency exchange is also actively engaging with its user base, issuing notifications to those potentially affected by such malware. The exchange platform encourages users to report any suspicious activity immediately, enabling the security team to take swift action. 

Moreover, the exchange recommends that users install and maintain reputable security software, which can provide an additional layer of defense by detecting and removing malware.

Preventative Strategies to Combat Crypto Scams

To combat the threat of this crypto scam, Binance advocates a proactive approach to online security. Users are urged to verify the sources of any downloadable apps or plugins, sticking to official and reputable outlets. Regular updates to security software can also help protect against the latest threats.

More so, this week, the American division of the crypto exchange, BinanceUS, partnered with digital asset custody firm Fireblocks. This collaboration aims to improve the security of customer assets against crypto scams using sophisticated wallet technologies. 

Similarly, to combat crypto scams, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) launched educational collaborations with both federal and private entities to inform the public about prevalent scams, such as “pig butchering” and other deceptive schemes. 

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. His work includes notable contributions to Cryptopolitan and Coingape News Media, where he shares his insights on the latest developments in the cryptocurrency market. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading

crime

Americans lost over $5.6b in crypto scams in 2023, FBI says

Published

on



Crypto-related scams and fraud surged last year, with losses skyrocketing 45% in 2023 compared to the previous year, according to a new FBI report.

As crypto gains popularity in the United States, it also brings a rise in crypto scams. According to an FBI report released Sept. 9, the total losses to these scams exceeded $5.6 billion in 2023.

In 2023, the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center received more than 69,000 complaints from the public regarding financial fraud involving cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), or Tether (USDT).

Investment scams were the most costly, accounting for 71% of the total losses, or about $3.96 billion. Call center fraud and government impersonation scams followed, contributing to 10% of the losses.

The most vulnerable demographic appears to be individuals over 60, who reported the highest number of complaints. According to the FBI, their collective losses surpassed $1.6 billion.

Different types of crypto scams 

Scammers often establish trust through dating apps or social media before luring victims into fraudulent cryptocurrency investments. Some of the scams highlighted by the FBI include investment scams, lottery scams, romance scams, credit card fraud, extortion, and ransomware.

Some of these scams like romance scams, often dubbed as pig butchering scams, involve fraudsters befriending victims under the pretense of a potential love interest

Victims may be allowed to withdraw small sums to build credibility, but they eventually find themselves duped into larger losses. In some cases, fraudulent recovery services that promise to retrieve their stolen funds further exploit the victims.

The FBI urged the public to exercise extreme caution when approached with investment opportunities by individuals they have only met online, emphasizing that anyone can be a target.



Source link

Continue Reading

24/7 Cryptocurrency News

Are Bitcoin ATMs A Hidden Threat To Cryptocurrency Security?

Published

on


The Bitcoin ATM has gained significant popularity recently, especially with the growing adoption of digital assets globally. However, with its rising popularity, concerns are also increasing over its potential impact on crypto security. A recent US FTC report highlights the surge in scams and vulnerabilities, sparking concerns for the users.

Bitcoin ATMs And Their Impact On Crypto Security

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has flagged BTC ATMs as a major tool for scammers. According to a recent FTC report, fraudsters are increasingly using these machines to trick people into depositing cash directly into their crypto wallets.

Typically, scammers impersonate officials, warn victims about supposed financial threats, and advise them to deposit money into the payment instrument to “protect” their funds. However, in turn, these funds go straight to the scammer’s wallet, with no chance of recovery.

Meanwhile, the FTC’s data shows a staggering rise in reported losses, with over $110 million lost to Bitcoin ATM scams since 2020. In just the first six months of 2024, losses surpassed $65 million, affecting consumers of all ages.

The median loss reported was $10,000, with older adults over 60 being particularly vulnerable. These scams often involve government impersonation, business fraud, or fake tech support, exploiting victims’ fears to gain access to their money.

However, to protect against these schemes, the FTC advises users never to respond to unexpected messages, avoid withdrawing cash due to unsolicited calls, and verify any suspicious claims independently. The report said that real businesses and government agencies will never demand payments through this BTC payment option, making it crucial for consumers to recognize and avoid these deceptive tactics.

Meanwhile, last month, German authorities targeted unauthorized crypto ATMs, seizing 13 machines from 35 various locations and impounding a staggering $28 million in cash. This enforcement action highlights the country’s efforts to regulate the use of cryptocurrency ATMs and prevent illicit activities.

Why Are Crypto Hackers Targeting The BTC Payment Option?

Beyond scams, Bitcoin ATMs also pose significant cybersecurity risks. Experts warn that these machines are especially vulnerable to both physical and digital attacks. Unlike traditional ATMs, these alternatives are prime targets for hackers due to the high value of cryptocurrencies.

A recent CNBC report cites Timothy Bates, a cybersecurity professor, who points out that malware attacks on these machines can capture private keys, steal funds, or manipulate transactions. Many of these crypto ATMs also suffer from outdated software and lack regular security patches, increasing their susceptibility to cyber threats.

In addition, another concern of these ATMs is network vulnerabilities. If the machine’s network is unsecured, hackers can intercept data transfers, leading to unauthorized access or data theft. Joe Dobson, an analyst at Mandiant, highlights that Bitcoin’s decentralized nature, while a strength, also means there’s no governing body overseeing the ATMs. This lack of oversight opens the door for independent operators, some of whom may neglect essential security protocols.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin ATMs often require personal identification, such as Social Security numbers, for compliance with Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. If compromised, this sensitive information could fall into the wrong hands, putting users at risk.

✓ Share:

Rupam Roy

Rupam, a seasoned professional with 3 years in the financial market, has honed his skills as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He finds joy in exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently working as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam’s expertise goes beyond conventional boundaries. His contributions encompass breaking stories, delving into AI-related developments, providing real-time crypto market updates, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam’s journey is marked by a passion for unraveling the intricacies of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon