Connect with us

business

Bitcoin Miners Are Still Buying New Hardware Despite Headwinds—Here’s Why

Published

on



In the midst of shrinking revenues and rising operational costs, industry experts tell Decrypt that Bitcoin miners are continuing to invest in new, specialized hardware, displaying strong confidence in the future of the leading crypto network despite short-term struggles.

According to a Glassnode report released this week, Bitcoin’s hash rate—an essential measure of mining activity—remains near all-time highs, just 1% shy, even though revenues have plummeted.

The mining industry is currently facing a double challenge: increasing mining difficulty and declining transaction fee revenue. As the hash rate rises, so does the difficulty of mining and earning a BTC block reward, thus pushing production costs higher. 

This, combined with cooling demand for high-fee transactions like those from Runes tokens and the NFT-like Ordinals, has squeezed miners’ profitability in recent months. Still, miners continue to invest in new ASIC hardware, in part due to the need to stay competitive in an environment where older machines are rapidly becoming obsolete.

One major factor driving this trend is improved energy efficiency in modern ASIC equipment, which helps miners manage operating costs. 

Speaking with Decrypt, Illia Otychenko, lead analyst at crypto exchange CEX.IO, said that the energy efficiency of dedicated Bitcoin mining hardware “more than doubled” from 2018 to 2023, “significantly reducing the energy consumption per coin produced.” 

This advancement allows miners to mitigate rising electricity costs and mining difficulty, keeping profitability intact even amid unfavorable market conditions.

While the price of Bitcoin remains relatively strong, transaction fee pressure has eased, further squeezing miners’ profits. With transaction fee revenue now a small fraction of what it once was, miners are leaning more heavily on block subsidies to sustain operations.

Interestingly, miners are now shifting their strategies in response to this revenue squeeze.

Historically, they sold the bulk of their mined Bitcoin to cover operational costs, but the report highlights that many are now retaining a portion of their mined supply in treasury reserves. Marathon Digital, for example, announced in July that it would adopt a “full HODL” strategy, saying it would no longer sell mined BTC. In fact, it has bought more from the market, as well.

Jeffrey Hu, head of investment research at HashKey Capital, sees this as a sign of confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term value.

“Miners retaining a portion of their mined supply suggests they are banking on future price appreciation,” Hu told Decrypt. “It’s a sign of confidence and could reduce selling pressure in the market, potentially supporting prices.”

However, Hu also cautions that this strategy comes with risks, particularly if miners are forced to sell reserves during downturns, which could exacerbate sell pressure.

Ryan Lee, chief analyst at Bitget Research, attributed the reasons behind the rising hash rate partly to the reintroduction of older mining rigs, which are becoming profitable again with Bitcoin’s price gains over the past year. 

“Older machines are being brought back into operation as Bitcoin’s price makes previously unprofitable hardware viable. This, combined with new investments in more efficient machines, is driving the total hash rate higher,” says Lee.

He also points to recent regulatory support in regions like Russia, along with positive signals from figures like former President Donald Trump, who has come out in support of Bitcoin and the crypto industry amid his latest run to return to the White House. Such shifts have bolstered the hash rate by reducing market uncertainty, Hu noted.

While these factors help offset some of the revenue challenges, experts agree that miners need to explore alternative revenue streams to ensure long-term profitability. When Decrypt surveyed the mining landscape at Bitcoin 2024 in July, there was a sense that firms were weathering an “identity crisis” of sorts—but it’s one that could ultimately help them in the long run.

Livepeer co-founder and CEO Doug Petkanics suggested that Bitcoin miners are well-positioned to diversify into AI computing, which demands vast amounts of compute power.

“The demand for AI compute power is growing exponentially. With their existing energy and cooling infrastructure, miners could tap into this market by adding GPUs and providing a new revenue stream,” said Petkanics.

Diversification could be key to surviving the increasingly competitive landscape of the mining industry. Firms like Core Scientific and Bitdeer are among those who are providing computing power for AI needs to shore up potential shortcomings with their Bitcoin business.

Otychenko predicts further consolidation, with capital-rich miners outlasting smaller operations. 

CleanSpark’s acquisition of GRIID for $155 million in June this year, is a prime example, boosting its hosting capacity as part of its growth strategy. Similarly, Bitfarms recently acquired Stronghold Digital Mining, while Riot Platforms has acquired a 19% stake in Bitfarms to influence its direction. 

Companies like Marathon Digital also see future acquisition opportunities to secure low-cost energy and scalable infrastructure.

“We may see further mergers and acquisitions as larger miners absorb struggling competitors to expand their market share,” he notes. For those unable to adapt, the rising operational costs may prove unsustainable, leading to a shake-up in the industry.

Hu also points to the possibility of new financing products designed to protect miners from market volatility, as well as innovative ways for mining pools to generate additional revenue, such as merged mining for new layer-2 solutions on Bitcoin.

“The mining industry might also grow in regions like the Middle East, where natural resources and a rapidly growing crypto business present new opportunities,” he adds.

However, even with diversification, miners’ profitability remains heavily reliant on block rewards, which currently account for over 90% of their revenue.

“Transaction fees only become significant during fee spikes, as we saw with Runes and Ordinals, but such events are temporary,” Otychenko said. “Block rewards are still the main revenue driver.”

Lee echoed this sentiment, warning that miners will eventually need to rely more on transaction fees as block rewards diminish with each halving cycle. He predicted that Bitcoin’s price could surge during the next bull cycle, potentially reaching $150,000. 

This would attract more retail participation in mining, as smaller players enter the market by purchasing older, more affordable machines.

“While larger miners may shift toward asset management,” Lee said, “retail miners could generate consistent cash flow if Bitcoin’s price continues to rise.”

Edited by Andrew Hayward and Ryan Ozawa

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

business

Bluesky Signups Surge After Elon Musk’s Twitter Says AI Can Be Trained on Tweets

Published

on



Bluesky is taking off like a rocket, and Elon Musk might’ve just lit the fuse. The decentralized social platform hit the 12 million user mark this week, reporting a massive surge of growth since its latest milestone of 10 million users surpassed just last month.

The platform reported Friday that it received over 1 million new signups in a 48-hour period.

What sparked this digital gold rush? Look no further than Musk’s Twitter (aka X). The billionaire’s been on quite a roll lately, but not the good kind. This week users found out about three major changes in the platform’s policies, some of which have rubbed longtime tweeters the wrong way.

The first one is a privacy policy update. Twitter is amending its privacy policy to allow third-party AI developers to train their models on user data. This change, set to take effect on November 15, has raised concerns about data privacy and usage—and there is no clear way to opt-out.

Next is something that may be worrisome to a more mainstream user database: Twitter is essentially removing the block function’s ability to prevent users from viewing content. This change significantly weakens user control over their online experience, and has been criticized for potentially exposing users to harassment.

Finally, Twitter is moving its legal jurisdiction from California to the Northern District of Texas, an area known for its conservative judges which tend to be more aligned with Elon’s far-right views. This move has raised eyebrows among users and critics alike.

Bluesky is not being shy about capitalizing on Twitter’s mess. The platform is plastering its “user-first” approach all over… well, Twitter.

“At Bluesky, we take online safety seriously,” Bluesky’s official X account tweeted, “If you want to block someone, you can! It’s your experience to customize.”

Users were quick to point out how this policy update would play against Twitter’s image, and they were correct. The official Bluesky account is practically doing a victory lap, boasting about its record growth just a day after Musk’s latest policy changes.

So significant was the influx that Bluesky’s servers collapsed due to the unexpected traffic spike. In fact, the app has been topping the charts in many countries like Japan, and reached the top 5 on Apple’s iOS App Store in the United States.

Musk’s meddling may be benefiting Bluesky, but Twitter is financially bleeding out. Fidelity’s latest estimate puts Twitter’s value at a measly $9.4 billion—that’s an 80% nosedive since Musk bought it for over $44 billion in 2022. This decline is further compounded by advertisers withdrawing due to concerns over brand safety and platform stability.

This isn’t the first time Bluesky has benefited from Twitter’s controversies. The platform saw a significant uptick in users when Twitter was temporarily banned in Brazil due to content moderation issues and a refusal to pay fines. At that time, Bluesky gained approximately 3 million new users in just one week, and reached a total of 10 million users mostly thanks to Brazilians joining in.

“Welcome to the one million new users in the last three days,” the platform said back then. “This is now a Brazilian app,” it replied in Portuguese.

Bluesky’s rapid ascent is reflected in its impressive engagement metrics: 473 million posts, 448.5 million follows, and 1.8 billion likes, with Friday being the most active day yet in terms of engagement according to data shared by one of its official developers.

As social media users become increasingly concerned about data privacy and platform control, the landscape appears to be shifting.

Bluesky’s decentralized model and emphasis on user autonomy are clearly resonating with those seeking alternatives to traditional social media giants, especially now that users are more aware of how companies use their private data and interactions to profit and train AI models.

Bluesky, of course, spawned from Twitter—albeit under previously leadership. In 2019, under co-founder and former CEO Jack Dorsey, Twitter seeded the team that eventually spun out and launched Bluesky, tasking them with developing a decentralized protocol that could one day even power Twitter along with other social apps.

But now with Musk in charge, Bluesky has instead become the most prominent Twitter rival not operated by a massive tech giant. And it’s only growing.

Edited by Andrew Hayward

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.





Source link

Continue Reading

Bitcoin

Blackrock CEO Is Right: Trump and Kamala Can’t Stop Bitcoin

Published

on


I’ll admit – just a few years ago, I’d be shocked to hear myself say that the CEO of BlackRock is making good points about Bitcoin.

As head of the world’s largest asset manager, I assumed Larry Fink would be Bitcoin’s biggest critic. But compared to dismissive remarks on Bitcoin from other Wall Street leaders like Jamie Dimon, Fink’s perspective is a refreshing change.

If you think otherwise, yesterday’s earnings call proves it.

There, Fink declared, “I’m not sure if either president would make a difference” on Bitcoin’s growth,” adding “I don’t believe [Bitcoin’s rise] is a function of regulation.”

He went on to compare Bitcoin’s growth to much larger markets like mortgages, noting liquidity and transparency drives adoption more than rules.

It’s wild that the CEO of an $11 trillion company is not just embracing Bitcoin, but that he gets that Bitcoin thrives because it is an apolitical, decentralized, global money.

Regulation aside, Bitcoin marches on indifferently. Fink seems to grasp what many Bitcoiners don’t – that political winds don’t sway Bitcoin’s course long-term. Neither Donald Trump or Kamala Harris can stop Bitcoin from setting new all-time highs.

Bitcoin thrives on its own technical merits, not regulatory benevolence.

This independence was always its promise. Now, the world’s financial giants aren’t fighting it, but joining in. Bullish.





Source link

Continue Reading

business

Vexl: The Next Generation Bitcoin P2P Trading App

Published

on



Company Name: Vexl

Founders: Lea Petrášová, Marek Palatinus and Pavol Rusnak

Date Founded: June 2022

Location of Headquarters: Prague, Czech Republic

Amount of Bitcoin Held in Treasury: The majority of the treasury is bitcoin

Number of Employees: 5 full-time employees and 5 part-time employees/volunteers

Website: https://vexl.it/

Public or Private? Private

Lea Petrášová is a cypherpunk at heart with over 10 years of experience in the world of software development.

This made her a perfect candidate to help create Vexl, an open-source app that enables users to conduct private peer-to-peer bitcoin transactions in a relatively easy manner.

With Vexl, Petrášová and the team from SatoshiLabs (well-known for creating Trezor hardware wallets) created what Petrášová terms a “social network” that connects buyers and sellers of bitcoin via the contacts in their phone as well as the contacts of their contacts. What is more, the communication between users is private, and Vexl doesn’t charge for the service it provides.

Petrášová and the team at Vexl are on a mission to enable people to use Bitcoin the way it was intended to be used — without KYC, privately and without third-party intermediaries involved in the process.

We spoke with Petrášová to get more details on Vexl’s mission.

Frank Corva: Please tell us about Vexl’s mission.

Lea Petrášová: We believe that without the freedom to transact, we have no other rights. Bitcoin gives us the ultimate entry ticket to a financial system that is not inherently exploitative and oppressive.

However, for it to serve this purpose, it cannot be tied to one’s identity. We provide our users with an option to buy or sell bitcoin peer-to-peer without KYC, in a way that is not only private, but also accessible, user-friendly, and secure.

Corva: What were you doing before Vexl?

Petrášová: I used to be a project manager for a small venture fund that also operated as a software house. In 2018, I launched a spin-off focused exclusively on web3 development, particularly in DeFi. While the projects were academically interesting, after selling the company, I realized I wanted to dedicate my time and energy solely to Bitcoin.

Corva: How did the idea for Vexl come about and how did you get involved?

Petrášová: This idea had actually been brewing in Slush‘s (co-founder of SatoshiLabs, Trezor, Vexl) mind for a few years. As one of the industry’s OGs, he anticipated the regulations long before they came into effect.

When he found out I had recently wrapped up my previous job, he reached out and pitched what would later become Vexl, essentially offering me the opportunity to take on the executive management of the project. I didn’t hesitate for a second.

Corva: Vexl seems to embrace much of the bitcoin ethos. It’s an app that allows for peer-to-peer trading, it doesn’t require much KYC and it’s open-source. Why was it important for you to design it this way?

Petrášová: We’re not just Bitcoiners; we’re also cypherpunks and activists.

When we came up with Vexl, we were solving our own problem: how to buy or sell Bitcoin without KYC, outrageous fees, or significant security and safety risks.

We couldn’t design a product we wouldn’t be willing to use ourselves. There was never any debate about the nature of the software—we knew from day one it had to be open source, KYC-free, and peer-to-peer.

However, we spent a lot of time researching and balancing the “trilemma” of usability, security, and privacy.

Corva: What has it been like to work with Pavol Rusnák, a legend in the bitcoin/crypto wallet space?

Petrášová: Humbling. He’s the kind of thinker you can ask any question, and he’ll respond with an original answer. The range of his knowledge and interests is deeply impressive. Yet, he approaches people and projects with kindness, respect, and most importantly, a great sense of humor. He’s truly inspiring.

Corva: You don’t plan to monetize Vexl. Why?

Petrášová: We strongly believe in the importance of our mission and are committed to making it as accessible as possible.

Corva: How will Vexl continue to exist if you don’t monetize it?

Petrášová: We rely directly on donations and grants. I have deep gratitude and mad respect for everyone who has helped us make Vexl a success. But thanks to open source, if, for any reason, we were to fail, I want to believe that someone else would pick up where we left off and keep things moving forward.

Corva: Vexl is essentially a messaging app, something that connects buyers and sellers to transact between themselves much like LocalBitcoins did. Why did you create something like this right now?

Petrášová: Because we clearly saw the need. Think about it — Bitcoin is currently the 6th largest monetary asset, aspiring to become a global, universal store of value.

Governments, through various third parties and financial institutions, can create registries of bitcoin holders. These individuals could then be censored, prosecuted, taxed, and have their ownership controlled, compromised, or even outlawed.

Knowing the identities of Bitcoin users weakens Bitcoin’s ability to function as a store of value independent of state power. That was the first part of our motivation.

The second part of our motivation was much more practical: Every time I orange-pilled someone and didn’t want to send them to an exchange, I didn’t have a good alternative. My options were either selling them my own bitcoin or going through a lengthy search to find someone else who could.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m a huge fan of platforms like LocalBitcoins. But as someone who has never bought bitcoin with KYC or registered on an exchange, I know firsthand the limitations that come with options like this.

Corva: How does Vexl differ from other P2P apps like Hodl Hodl, Bisq and Peach Bitcoin?

Petrášová: Well, first of all, we’re a non-profit, so we operate in a completely different space. I don’t see other solutions out there as competing, rather view them as complementary.

The real innovation that Vexl introduces is our unique reputation model. On our marketplace, you can only view anonymized offers from your contacts and their contacts. Until both parties decide to reveal their identities, you don’t know who the other person is, but you can always see how many mutual contacts you share and who those people are, and eventually ask them for a reference.

This allows you to better assess the individual risk of the counterparty, which is nearly impossible when you’re connecting two strangers from opposite sides of the world — not to mention, it can be downright dangerous if you’re using a fiat wire transfer for settlement.

If you really think about it, we managed to bring a real-world reputation into an app. And this social aspect — human interactions and experience — can’t be replaced by any technology. That’s why on Vexl there is no escrow, no fees, and no need to already have bitcoin in order to join.

Lastly, I’m particularly proud of our user experience. While creating Vexl, I kept asking myself, “Could my aunt use this without a hitch?” That mindset shaped our UI, and I believe it’s far more user-friendly than anything else out there.

Corva: Why does Vexl not push to decentralize its backend?

Petrášová: We’re a non-profit with very lean operations. In a team as small as ours, we have to think twice when choosing what to prioritize.

While decentralizing the backend is something we’ll focus on in the future, right now our backlog is full of more pressing app improvements.

What’s great is that Vexl is already politically decentralized. Anyone who doesn’t want to rely on my decisions can simply take the code and alter it however they see fit.

Corva: Why does Vexl ask for phone numbers?

Petrášová: If you zoom out, you’ll see that Vexl is, ultimately, a social network. Anyone who has ever tried to build one from scratch will agree that it’s an incredibly difficult task. So, we chose a different route: Why not build on top of an existing network? But then came an even bigger question: Which one?

We also wanted something that’s not going away anytime soon and that’s widely adopted across the world.

The answer was clear to us: using phone numbers and contact lists. From there we just had to find a way to use them while still keeping them private and secure.

Corva: Do you ever see mass adoption of Vexl or do you think the average person will find going to a regulated exchange like Kraken more convenient?

Petrášová: Sometimes I get asked what my biggest apprehension is as the CEO of a Bitcoin company, and my answer is always “ignorance.” People often don’t care about financial freedom until it’s too late.

That being said, nothing is better marketing for us than the current financial system becoming more and more unbearably unusable and commerce becoming increasingly permissioned. From this perspective, it would be a beautiful world if tools like Vexl became obsolete.

But Vexl has been invented, and it cannot be uninvented. Maybe it will be used for peer-to-peer bitcoin transactions. Or it might be used in the gig economy or to pay for goods in bitcoin.

Ever since we introduced categories in the marketplace, we’ve seen circular economies booming. I’m building Vexl for everyone who has the courage to claim their financial sovereignty — even if it only serves a small community of users.

Corva: Where are you seeing the most adoption for the app thus far? Why do you think people in these regions are adopting it?

Petrášová: Most of our users are from the Czech Republic and Slovakia. I think the success has a lot to do with the history of these countries and their economic isolation during communist times. There is a long tradition of people hedging against oppression with stronger currencies and participating in the gray economy. Additionally, the support of SatoshiLabs definitely helped us a lot during the launch, especially in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, where SatoshiLabs is well-known and respected.

We also see significant growth in Germany, Austria, Italy, Switzerland and the UK, mostly scaling through meetups. In recent months, I am really thrilled to see local Vexl initiatives thrive in African countries, as well.

Corva: What’s next for Vexl?

Petrášová: Over the course of the summer, we managed to successfully rewrite our backend, which had been a major hurdle for future development. This opened up the opportunity for us to introduce a wide variety of improvements to the social network that we had on our roadmap for a long time.

Another major focus is providing education about the importance of non-KYC Bitcoin. It’s disturbingly common that users don’t realize the true cost they pay for comfort or convenience when giving up their personal data on financial institutions.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon