Connect with us

Adoption

Hybrid crypto exchanges will inevitably reign in the market

Published

on


Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

As we start to see renewed interest in crypto—with prices hovering near their all-time highs and prominent people and institutions discussing the industry—building a robust crypto exchange is essential.

Crypto traders’ standards for an exchange are higher than ever. They are looking for a sleek user experience, architecture that supports high throughput and low latency, and top-notch security. The latter is especially important given the industry is still recovering from the implosion of FTX and the domino effect it had on other businesses in the space. 

While centralized exchanges excel at building beautiful user interfaces and intuitive user experiences, they operate at speed by custodying users’ funds for them. As the industry has seen many times throughout crypto’s history, funds that the users themselves don’t control can be mismanaged by fraudulent actors. Additionally, CEXs possess the authority to limit access to accounts, such as freezing funds or halting withdrawals. As the crypto adage goes: Not your keys, not your coins. 

Decentralized exchanges, on the other hand, grant users complete control over their funds with self-custody. They leverage blockchain technology and smart contracts to execute trustless trade and settlement. However, this architecture can be clunky and complex for users to navigate. It comes with trade-offs in throughput and latency, the absence of advanced trading features (like advanced order types and conditions), and can also deal out significant fees to pay gas for settlement on a blockchain. 

A new crop of crypto entrepreneurs is thinking about exchange architecture differently. They are looking to combine aspects of a centralized and decentralized exchange with building on the best of both worlds. Enter hybrid crypto exchange. 

A better trading engine for a better crypto trader

CEXs from the last cycle, including Coinbase and Binance, built their businesses by copying the UI of broker platforms and mimicking the mechanics of broker platforms and the UI of fintech apps. They focused on user-friendly UI, robust mobile apps, competitive fees, and an extensive selection of coins and tokens. 

The centralized trading infrastructure offers high throughput and low latency, which is what the world demands for crypto trading. Going deeper, high throughput and low latency enable better liquidity, as market makers can reprice quicker. They also allow for more efficient margin usage, as a centralized risk engine enables the exchange to offer higher leverage. Centralization enables advanced trading features and logic, such as advanced order types and conditions. 

Aside from performance, it allows exchanges to have more control over compliance. CEXs control what customers have access to their platform and can manage the access of those users by implementing robust blockchain analysis, fincrime, and compliance programs. In the wake of FTX, lawmakers and enforcement agencies have been clamping down on the industry, dishing out huge fees and even jail time to businesses and entrepreneurs that are found to be skirting regulations. 

So, to sum up, that’s why the hybrid exchange model inherits the bright side of centralization. The trading architecture is kept centralized to a large extent. UX is also inherited from CEX because DEXs simply lack features, such as simple account creation, which eliminates the need for users to already have a wallet before interacting with the exchange. DEXes are also limited in their on- and off-ramps, fee abstraction, and advanced trading analytics. Especially as another batch of crypto traders enters the space during what appears to be the beginning of a bull run, a powerful feature set on top of a polished user experience is critical. 

It all sounds like a flawless victory for centralization so far. The question is, what do hybrid exchanges inherit from decentralized ones? The answer is simple: The essential feature that enables trust in crypto trading. And centralization has a dark side.  

Give users the keys

Hybrid exchanges still pull from DEX concepts by utilizing blockchain technology to secure funds. Users self-custody their funds, and trades are settled on the blockchain at various periods. Another crucial trait is the on-chain validation of the trading logic, which will prevent operator fraud. As such, trust is provable, and transparency is immutable. 

Operator fraud is one of the most significant risks in crypto. CEX’s control over funds is beneficial for compliance reasons; however, it grants the authority to limit access to accounts, such as freezing funds or halting withdrawals. The collapse of FTX certainly heightened concerns over an operator’s access to user funds. Yet, FTX wasn’t the first or only exchange to mishandle user funds and call into question the CEX model. One of the first-ever crypto exchanges, MtGox, completely shut down and filed for bankruptcy in early 2014 because of an undetected theft over many years that drained the exchange of more than 850,000 Bitcoin (BTC). In 2018, Canadian exchange QuadrigaCX went dark and was later revealed to be a Ponzi scheme, causing the loss of roughly $190 million in user funds. 

These continued instances highlight the importance of self-custody and trustless on-chain settlement, whereby users hold the keys to their own coins instead of trusting a centralized entity that isn’t fully transparent to retain their keys. 

Scaling tech for cutting costs

In the derivatives market, traders often transact in large volumes, which can accrue significant fees. There is no feeless trading. CEXs and DEXs charge fees for trading, but DEX users have an additional cost to settle all their trades on a blockchain. These fees fluctuate depending on the overall usage of the blockchain at any given period. Earlier this year, in March, Ethereum transaction costs skyrocketed to nearly a two-year high due to increased speculation in meme tokens.

The hybrid exchange approach simplifies the fee structure because trading is centralized and relies on layer-2 technology to boost scalability while keeping transaction fees low. Rollups are one such scalability solution that processes transactions on a separate network before bundling the transaction data into batches to submit and settle to the main chain. 

Now’s the time to go hybrid

Blending features from centralized and decentralized exchange architecture is an obvious choice in a market that’s becoming more mature and competitive. 

The speed, usability, and design of CEX help users of all levels of technical know-how trade crypto easily. And the security provided by implementing aspects of DEX will create an ecosystem of trust and reliability that gives users peace of mind. 

The hybrid crypto exchange is poised to be the winning business model in the next bull run, highlighting that it’s not always about reinventing the wheel as much as it’s about creatively putting the pieces together. It’s not a one-size-fits-all industry; it won’t have a one-size-fits-all solution.

Ruslan Fakhrutdinov

Ruslan Fakhrutdinov

Ruslan Fakhrutdinov is an ex-McKinsey consultant and former Head of Crypto Operations at Revolut. Ruslan played a significant role in the development of numerous crypto products. He had P&L responsibility for one of the company’s largest and most profitable departments, which generated £220 million in gross profit in 2021. In 2023, Ruslan left the fintech giant to launch his own venture, X10, a hybrid crypto exchange.



Source link

Adoption

SocialFi, web3, and UX: Cracking the trillion dollar creator economy

Published

on


Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

SocialFi is a web3 industry attempt at solving the problem of monetizing digital content—the genuine issue affecting millions of talented creators worldwide.

From the perspective of daily users, it might be hard to see creators struggling. However, despite producing quality content daily, the overwhelming majority do not make any money at all. Many SocialFi projects have been launched in the last couple of years, aiming to solve this very monetization part by rewarding every digital interaction for both creators and users. Unfortunately, most seem to have missed the mark by leaning too heavily on aspects of decentralization rather than offering real-world solutions to existing problems. 

The origins of mass interest in this space occurred during the pandemic lockdowns. With the idea of pursuing a passion-based career becoming more mainstream, the future of social monetization was catapulted into a new growth phase. This was also a time when the crypto industry saw a mass influx of retail investors, with industry narratives steering towards building pragmatic, real-world solutions. This led to significant advancement in the SocialFi movement, and plenty has been achieved since then in terms of on-chain innovation, tokenized community governance, integration of NFTs, and other DeFi products that authentically bridge issues around creator monetization and user rewards. 

Yet, as a sector claiming to be the future of the trillion-dollar creator and freelancer economy, the modest market cap of SocialFi tokens is over $2 billion. This indicates that the sector has a long way to go in establishing itself into a global financial ecosystem. Contrast this with DeFi’s market cap (around $70 billion) or even of NFTs (around $62 billion), and it’s clear that SocialFi has a long road ahead. 

Thankfully, there are signs that SocialFi platforms and the utility tokens that power them have a bright future. This is seen in the significant volume of new users willing to join a newly launched SocialFi platform. Sure, many of these users are only there for the free rewards, but that’s the current norm for web3, whether they like it or not.

The benefits of SocialFi

To benefit from such early user traction, builders in SocialFi must be real with themselves when designing a product. The reality is that very few creators care about (or will even benefit from) decentralized content ownership or on-chain proof of IP rights. Although this is a USP widely marketed in web3, it only benefits the top 1% of celebrity creators in the world. 

What about the masses? What USP will win their attention and loyalty? The answer to this holds the solution for how SocialFi platforms can finally win market share from Big Tech’s platforms, and central to this is building hybrid ecosystems. This means fusing blockchain features (such as tokenization) with non-blockchain architecture, providing an intuitive and seamless user experience for the masses. 

While DeFi and blockchain technologies have a variety of clear benefits and value, mass adoption won’t happen if web2 users are required to get past the web3 wall of creating a digital wallet, store a 20-word seed phrase, and interact with an unfamiliar user experience. If creating an account is harder than starting an Instagram account, you’ve already lost 95% of all potential users. From a user experience standpoint, people cannot be held back by the intimidating web3 gates. 

Appealing to the masses

The winners in this space will focus on the narrative that appeals to the masses, building a community of real creators, empowering them with web3 education, and implementing real-world token utility into a seamless user experience. That’s the formula for SocialFi’s success. 

Without a doubt, the SocialFi community is tackling these challenges, and 2024 remains a crucial year for projects in this space. The current wave of innovation is the most exciting one, as projects roll out user-centric features that focus on user experience and build upon the value that traditional platforms have already created for the creator community. Tokens matter, but as a secondary driver of growth, and should only exist as a medium to enhance the user experience. This realization will shape the sector moving forward.

Dave Catudal

Dave Catudal

Dave Catudal, co-founder of Lyvely, is an accomplished entrepreneur in tech and wellness with an extensive background in product innovation and e-commerce. Credited with founding several successful wellness ventures, Dave is building the future of SocialFi at Lyvely, integrating various aspects of web3 to deliver transparent monetization and engagement tools for the creator and freelance economy. Dave previously founded one of the GCC region’s fastest-growing D2C health supplement brands. He also holds a patent for his best-selling fitness machine and online program in the US.



Source link

Continue Reading

Adoption

VCs come and go, but launchpads will remain a fundamental part of web3

Published

on



Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

When starting a business, a great idea is worthless if no one is available or willing to invest the funds to make it bloom. In the hi-tech world, where creativity and competition mold our future via non-stop innovation, venture capital and private equity firms are the oxygen this fast-paced industry runs on. 

While a good idea may get you in the door, securing essential funding requires demonstrating capable leadership, a reasonable product-market fit, and a concise business strategy. That being said, fundraising in “traditional” tech is fairly structured and predictable with a higher tolerance for the patient, long-term approach. 

Crypto and web3 projects, on the other hand, view and conduct fundraising differently. Historically, some crypto and blockchain projects have attracted traditional Silicon Valley VCs like Andreessen Horowitz and Sequoia Capital to invest directly in exchange for equity or tokens. Many of these top VC firms have established subsidiary funds focused specifically on promising crypto and blockchain projects. 

However, VC investment tends to rise and fall in correlation with Bitcoin (BTC) and the broader crypto market. For example, VC investment in crypto hit an all-time high of nearly $12 billion in Q1 of 2022, following Bitcoin’s previous record-high price of $69,000 in November 2021. In fact, total VC funds raised in 2023 failed to eclipse 2022’s Q1, as the down market sent VCs running. 

Crypto’s bear market, defined by exchange collapses, hacks, and scams, coincided with the meteoric rise of AI. This further diverted VC attention away from web3 developments, even as the industry matured and started attracting more attention from traditional institutions. 

The blockchain industry has mostly been receptive to tech VC investment despite their stringent centralized operations and reluctance to invest during volatile periods. Due to crypto’s inherent volatility, inconsistent VC participation, lessons learned from the shady ICO era of 2017, and the industry’s hyper-competitive nature, IDO platforms emerged as an alternative funding route for early-stage projects. 

Launchpads became popular during the previous bull run as they provided a decentralized outlet for crypto communities to access a wide array of projects, letting them decide which ones are worthy of an investment. Driven by retail investors and growing crypto communities, launchpads like DAO Maker and Polkastarter supplied projects with valuable resources because they reflected the industry’s values while providing tools for projects and investors—including institutional players. 

As the industry weathered rough market conditions, causing token prices to freefall and projects to shut down, IDO platforms evolved with crypto. Multichain launchpads like ChainGPT and Seedify are now becoming the standard, enabling more projects to take part. 

Since regulatory scrutiny has thrown the industry a curveball, many launchpads have taken crucial steps to ensure they comply with any regional laws, including processes to protect investors. Launchpads are also transcending, simply providing a platform to help projects sell tokens. They are playing a more hands-on role with the projects they onboard, resembling incubators and accelerators common in mainstream tech. 

For example, Gems, a newly established launchpad, connects projects with its exclusive network of influential investors for post-launch support to accelerate growth. The platform boasts 4,000 investment “Leaders,” who gain exclusive access to thoroughly vetted projects while enabling a growing user community to also invest in high-potential startups. By carefully balancing the needs of investors and projects, Gems raised a combined $198 million for its first three project launches.   

Crypto developments are occurring at rapid rates, reshaping the industry before our eyes. Avenues for funding in this dynamic industry will likely continue to evolve as the industry matures, absorbs more users, and further penetrates traditional finance. Regardless, IDO launchpads will remain an invaluable infrastructure component, adapting innovative approaches to serving the industry while fostering communities and facilitating growth.



Source link

Continue Reading

Adoption

Over 1 Million Bitcoin Addresses Hold 1 BTC or More, Reflecting Strong Adoption

Published

on


According to data from Bitcoin Magazine Pro, there are 1,012,650 Bitcoin addresses that contain 1 BTC or more. 

This represents more than 1 million BTC potentially taken off the market and held by strong hands, a significant portion of the 21 million BTC that will ever exist. Demand continues to rise as U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs collectively hold over 901,000 BTC, while MicroStrategy, a major corporate Bitcoin holder, owns 226,500 BTC. Additionally, MicroStrategy plans to raise $2 billion to buy more Bitcoin, further emphasizing the trend of institutions buying and holding substantial amounts of BTC, tightening the available supply as demand increases.

The number of Bitcoin addresses holding 1 BTC or more has historically lagged behind BTC’s price. However, in the past two years, this trend has reversed, with the number of these addresses increasing more rapidly than Bitcoin’s price. This shift signals growing adoption and reflects rising long-term confidence in Bitcoin, as more users accumulate and hold significant amounts of Bitcoin.

The rise in addresses with 1 BTC or more signifies that both retail and institutional investors are actively accumulating Bitcoin. With only 21 million BTC ever to be mined, and approximately 19 million already in circulation, the demand for Bitcoin appears to be increasing as users aim to secure their share of the limited supply.

For more detailed information, insights, and to sign up to access Bitcoin Magazine Pro’s data and analytics, visit the official website here.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon