Connect with us

Law and Order

SEC Files Last-Minute Appeal in Ripple Case—Why the XRP Army is Outraged

Published

on



The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a last-minute appeal in its ongoing legal sparring with Ripple Labs, seeking to reverse parts of a summary judgment delivered by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres more than a year ago.

Torres’ July 2023 ruling partially favored Ripple by concluding that the company’s sales of XRP to retail investors on digital asset platforms did not violate U.S. securities laws. 

The court found that these transactions did not meet the legal criteria for an investment contract, dealing a blow to the SEC’s broader efforts to regulate cryptocurrency sales under existing securities laws.

Filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit late Thursday, the SEC does not contest the decision that XRP sales to retail investors through exchanges are not securities. Instead, the agency is focusing its challenge on other key aspects of the ruling.

The appeal targets the court’s decision that Ripple’s offers and sales of XRP on digital asset trading platforms, as well as personal sales by Ripple executives Bradley Garlinghouse and Christian Larsen, did not constitute securities violations. 

The agency is also contesting the ruling that Ripple’s distributions of XRP in exchange for non-cash consideration were not in breach of securities laws.

Ripple’s institutional sales of XRP to large investors were previously found to have violated securities laws by the U.S. Southern District Court, which imposed a $125 million civil penalty on the San Francisco-based firm.

The SEC’s appeal, which will be reviewed de novo, will allow the appellate court to reconsider the lower court’s interpretation of securities laws in relation to XRP sales on digital platforms and non-cash transactions. 

De novo means that the appellate court will reconsider these legal issues from scratch without deference to the district court’s interpretations. Ripple’s victory regarding XRP’s retail sales, however, remains intact and is not part of the appeal.

While it was widely anticipated that the SEC would file its notice of appeal on October 2, users have taken to social media to decry what they view as the agency missing a 14-day window for filing its Form C.

A Form C, in the context of appellate court procedures, is used by the appellant—in this case, the SEC—to provide basic information about the appeal and the lower court’s decision.

Filing is mandatory and must be done within 14 days of filing the notice of appeal, according to the form’s own legalese. It’s a date that some have accused the agency of missing, as the document is dated October 16, while the Second Circuit’s docket shows a filing for October 17. 

Decrypt attempted to contact the SEC on that point but has so far received no response. A spokesperson for Ripple did not answer questions relating to the deadline window, instead pointing Decrypt to a social media post by the firm’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty.

“No surprises here — once again, it’s been made clear. The Court’s ruling that “XRP is not a security” is NOT being appealed. That decision stands as the law of the land,” Alderoty tweeted Thursday.

“Stay tuned for Ripple’s Form C to be filed next week,” the executive added.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Law and Order

Trump Picks Bo Hines to Lead Presidential Crypto Council

Published

on



Bo Hines, a former Republican nominee for the House of Representatives, has been named by President-elect Donald Trump to be the Executive Director of the Presidential Council of Advisers for Digital Assets.

Per a Truth Social post from Trump, Hines will oversee a “new advisory group composed of luminaries from the crypto industry” and work alongside David Sacks, Trump’s pick for the White House AI and Crypto Czar.

“In his new role, Bo will work with David to foster innovation and” growth in the digital assets space, while ensuring industry leaders have the resources they need to succeed,” Trump posted. “Together, they will create an environment where this industry can flourish, and remain a cornerstone of our nation’s technological advancement.”

Hines was the Trump-endorsed Republican House nominee in North Carolina’s 13th District in 2022, but lost the race to Democratic rival Wiley Nickel. During that race, Hines received backing from former FTX Digital Markets CEO Ryan Salame, who later went to prison for unrelated campaign finance law violations, among other charges.

The 29-year-old Hines ran again for the House this year in the state’s 6th District, but lost in the primaries, placing fourth among Republican candidates. He does not appear to have a substantial public history of making comments related to Bitcoin or cryptocurrency.

“Thank you, Mr. President! It will be the honor of a lifetime to serve in your next administration. Thank you for everything you have done and continue to do for our country,” Hines wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter) on Sunday. “I am thrilled to work alongside the brilliant David Sacks to ensure that this industry will thrive and remain a cornerstone of our nation’s technological advancement.”

Alongside Hines, Trump also named former Andreessen Horowitz venture capitalist Sriram Krishnan as the Senior Policy Advisor for Artificial Intelligence at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Krishnan, who departed from the prominent VC firm in November, will also work closely with Sacks.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.





Source link

Continue Reading

Law and Order

United States of Bitcoin? These States Are Considering BTC Reserves

Published

on



Donald Trump and his political allies are plugging away at plans to stockpile Bitcoin at a national level in the U.S. Treasury. 

And now, with the asset’s price repeatedly soaring to new peaks since Election Day, some U.S. states are following suit.  

So far, three states are fielding proposals to establish strategic Bitcoin reserves, while digital asset advocates are calling for other local governments to do the same.

Here’s which states are considering topping up their coffers with the world’s oldest and most valuable digital currency. 

Texas

Texas legislators will soon weigh in on whether or not they should establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve. 

Texas State Representative Giovanni Capriglione proposed a bill in December that calls for the Lone Star State to create a Bitcoin stockpile. 

The draft legislation stipulates that Texas must hold the Bitcoin for at least five years. The cryptocurrency must be kept in cold storage—that is, on some kind of a device that is not connected to the internet—and the assets cannot be used to make transactions outside of Texas, according to the bill.

“A strategic Bitcoin reserve aligns with Texas’s commitment to fostering innovation in digital assets and providing Texans with enhanced financial security,” the bill reads.

Finally, the proposal also enables Texans to donate to the state’s Bitcoin fund.

Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania House of Representatives put forth a bill in November that called for the establishment of a strategic Bitcoin reserve.

Under the Bitcoin bill, Pennsylvania’s Treasurer would be able to buy Bitcoin with “up to 10%” of the State General Fund, Rainy Day Fund, and the State Investment Fund.

Tapping 10% of the State General Fund would allow the Pennsylvania Treasury to purchase nearly $1 billion worth of Bitcoin.  

“Bitcoin, which has appreciated significantly over the years, can help Pennsylvania keep pace with inflation and economic change,” the state’s lawmakers said in a legislative memo published on November 12. 

Ohio 

Ohio State Representative Derek Merrin on December 17 proposed a bill to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the Buckeye State

The Ohio Bitcoin Reserve Act calls for the creation of a Bitcoin fund in the state Treasury. It also vests Ohio’s State Treasurer with discretionary power to purchase the asset.

“Ohio must embrace technology and protect tax dollars from eroding,” Merrin said Tuesday in an X post. 

Although some details of how the reserve will work remain unclear, the draft legislation is expected to serve as a framework for Ohio lawmakers to build out in 2025.

Edited by Andrew Hayward

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Continue Reading

Law and Order

Hawk Tuah Girl Wakes Up, Plays Ball With Lawyers Suing Meme Coin Makers

Published

on



After 372 hours, Haliey Welch, better known as the Hawk Tuah girl, has finally woken from her slumber to announce she’s made some new friends—namely, the same law firm that’s suing her business partners over her failed meme coin project.

Sixteen days ago, Welch’s would-be meme coin debut, a Solana token called HAWK, imploded at launch, enriching an apparently interconnected web of early investors and leaving most retail traders in the lurch. That evening, Welch told an irate audience on an X Spaces that she was going to bed and would see everyone in the morning—before going radio silent for weeks on end.

On Friday, Welch broke that silence by announcing she is cooperating with the law firm that sued the HAWK token’s creators Thursday for allegedly violating American securities laws.

“I am fully cooperating with and am committed to assisting the legal team representing the individuals impacted, as well as to help uncover the truth, hold the responsible parties accountable, and resolve this matter,” Welch said on X (formerly known as Twitter). 

A spokesperson for Welch told Decrypt that the influencer was “totally siloed” from the HAWK project and “had zero control over it.”

The spokesperson also asserted that Welch only received a fixed sponsorship fee for lending her likeness to the meme coin project, adding “there was no guarantee she would make any additional money from the meme coin thereafter.”

That story runs somewhat counter to one put forward earlier this week by the team taking responsibility for building most of HAWK. The crypto token launch platform OverHere said on Tuesday that it only took leadership over the doomed token because one of Welch’s associates, a mysterious figure known as “Doc Hollywood,” “vanished when things got hard.”

The OverHere team claimed it took zero fees from HAWK and made zero profit on the project, and pointed the finger at Welch and Doc Hollywood for an alleged lack of transparency.

The lawsuit filed Thursday against the project—by 12 American plaintiffs claiming to have suffered damages in excess of $151,000 from the project—listed OverHere as one of multiple defendants. It did not list Welch. 

Alexandra Roberts, a law professor at Northeastern University, told Decrypt that she has never before seen a situation like this—in which a celebrity such as Welch has actively aided a lawsuit aimed at a project the celebrity lent their likeness to.

“I think it’s a great PR move,” Roberts said. “I think she’s trying to get out in front of it and make a really clear statement: ‘Not only did I not know what was going on, but I want to advocate on behalf of the people who were swindled.’”

Burwick Law, the firm suing HAWK’s creators, told Decrypt that it does not represent Welch, but is in conversations with her counsel.

When asked why Welch was not listed as a co-defendant in the HAWK lawsuit, Max Burwick, managing partner at Burwick Law, said the decision was intentional, and hinted it might help make his clients whole sooner. 

“In this matter, we have chosen the strategy we believe to be most effective in helping our clients achieve meaningful results,” Burwick told Decrypt.

Edited by Andrew Hayward

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon