Connect with us

Feature

Why is Ripple Betting Big on Harris and Shocking Everyone?

Published

on



Ripple has thrown millions behind Kamala Harris. What’s the real agenda here? Is this about politics, or is Ripple gearing up for something bigger with XRP?

Ripple’s split personality hits

Ripple, the blockchain giant behind XRP, has always been in the spotlight for something or the other. Lately, though, it seems Ripple is stepping up its political game, especially with some eye-catching statements from its CEO, Brad Garlinghouse.

During the D.C. Fintech Week event, Garlinghouse gave a rare nod to Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, praising her approach to digital assets. He even went as far as calling her stance on crypto “most constructive.”

Now, this raises some eyebrows, considering Ripple’s historical neutrality in U.S. elections and its rocky relationship with the U.S. regulators.

But Garlinghouse’s comments come at an interesting time—one where Ripple is eyeing the possibility of an XRP ETF and dealing with the aftershocks of its longstanding legal battle with the U.S. SEC under a Democratic administration.

So, why the shift towards Harris, and what could it mean for Ripple’s future? Let’s take a look at Ripple’s political donations, the company’s hopes for an XRP ETF, and the drama surrounding it all.

Ripple’s political pivot

Traditionally, Ripple hasn’t exactly been best friends with the Democratic Party, especially considering the $1.3 billion lawsuit it faced from the SEC under President Biden’s administration in 2020.

Yet, here we are in 2024, watching Ripple CEO and co-founder Chris Larsen make bold statements and donations supporting Democratic presidential candidate Harris.

Garlinghouse, while still maintaining Ripple’s neutral stance on the election, described Harris as “pro-technology” and praised her connections to Silicon Valley.

He even suggested that either a Harris or Trump win would benefit the crypto industry, a notable contrast to his harsh criticism of the current Biden-led administration’s approach.

But the real drama unfolded when Chris Larsen donated a whopping $10 million in XRP to Harris’ campaign, following an earlier donation of $1 million. This came after Trump had been heavily courting crypto supporters, making Larsen’s move even more surprising.

Nic Carter, a well-known crypto venture capitalist, expressed his confusion on Twitter, calling the donation “completely baffling.” After all, many in the industry see Trump as more of a crypto champion, given his vocal support for digital assets.

But Garlinghouse defended his co-founder’s decision, stating that Ripple encourages its employees to support whoever they believe is best for the country, reiterating that this is more about pro-crypto policies than political party loyalty.

He voiced that the upcoming 2024 election is crucial for the future of the crypto industry. Whether Harris or Trump wins, Garlinghouse believes either candidate would improve upon what he called the Biden administration’s “failed approach” to digital assets.

This has only added to the speculation about Ripple’s motives, as the company’s relationship with the SEC remains contentious.

Ripple’s relationship with Democrats, particularly the SEC, has been far from smooth. In 2020, the SEC hit Ripple with a hefty lawsuit, accusing the company of selling unregistered securities in the form of XRP.

This lawsuit, filed during Biden’s presidency, has been a dark cloud hanging over Ripple for years. Though Ripple scored a partial victory in July 2023 when a judge ruled that XRP sales to retail investors didn’t qualify as securities, the SEC didn’t back down.

In the latest verdict in August 2024, the regulator sought a massive $2 billion fine, only to be awarded a much smaller $125 million penalty. Ripple hailed this as a victory, but the SEC’s ongoing appeal continues to create uncertainty.

A strategy of survival?

Ripple’s recent political moves have been anything but ordinary. Just months ago, in June 2024, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, made headlines with a hefty $300,000 XRP donation to Trump’s presidential campaign.

Alderoty’s donation came at a time when Trump had shifted towards a pro-crypto stance, a change that likely influenced the Ripple CLO’s decision. After all, many believed that if Trump returned to the White House, he would replace Gensler with a more crypto-friendly SEC chair, potentially benefiting the crypto industry.

In fact, between April and June 2024, Trump’s fundraising efforts brought in over $118 million, with $4 million of that in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and XRP.

High-profile donors such as Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss and BitGo CEO Mike Belshe have also backed Trump, further cementing the crypto industry’s alignment with the former president.

Despite Ripple’s apparent split allegiances, the broader crypto industry has been heavily backing Trump. Recent data from AdImpact reveals that crypto companies have spent 62% more on ads for Republicans than Democrats this year.

Fairshake, a top-spending PAC, has poured $54.6 million into election ads supporting GOP candidates, compared to $33.7 million for Democrats.

Much of this spending is concentrated on key House races in states like New York, Nevada, and California. For instance, Southern California Republicans David Valadao and Michael Garcia, both in tight races, have received $1.3 million and $1 million, respectively, from crypto-backed PACs.

Ripple’s dual strategy reflects the uncertainty surrounding the 2024 U.S. presidential election and its impact on the crypto industry.

With political donations from crypto groups reaching $190 million for this election cycle, the stakes have never been higher. Whether it’s Trump or Harris in the Oval Office come 2025, Ripple seems determined to ensure that it has a seat at the table. But why?

Ripple eyes XRP ETF

On one hand, Larsen has been vocally supporting Harris. On the other hand, Alderoty donated to Trump’s campaign in June 2024. However, Ripple’s recent donations—both to Harris and Trump—could be a strategic maneuver at play.

Bitwise and Canary Capital have already filed for XRP ETFs, which, if greenlit, would allow investors to gain exposure to XRP through a stock exchange without holding the actual cryptocurrency.

Garlinghouse, speaking to Bloomberg recently, even called an XRP ETF “inevitable,” noting that there is growing demand from both retail and institutional investors to access this asset class. If the XRP ETF is approved, it could shift the arena for Ripple and its stakeholders.

For instance, spot Bitcoin ETFs have grown to command over $50 billion in assets under management, proving that institutional investors are eager to gain exposure to cryptocurrency without the complexities of direct ownership.

On the other hand, Ethereum ETFs, despite launching with great anticipation in July 2024, have amassed only about $7 billion in AUM — a much smaller figure compared to Bitcoin.

From Ripple’s perspective, the approval of an XRP ETF would be a huge win. Not only would it validate XRP as a legitimate financial asset, but it would also help resolve the lingering concerns that the SEC lawsuit has raised.

Hence, an ETF would allow Ripple to meet investor demand in a regulated, mainstream way, boosting confidence in XRP and potentially driving up its price and liquidity.

With the SEC’s current resistance, Ripple’s donations to both Harris and Trump might be a strategic hedge, positioning the company to benefit from either candidate’s favor and finally secure approval for their long-awaited XRP ETFs — no matter who wins the 2024 election.





Source link

Bitcoin

Microsoft says ‘no’ to Bitcoin, corporates say ‘bring it on’

Published

on



Microsoft shareholders nixed a Bitcoin treasury idea, but other big-name companies disagree with this strategy. Here’s why.

Bitcoin (BTC) is often likened to “digital gold,” with its fixed supply of 21 million coins making it a potential hedge against currency devaluation and inflation.

And nowadays, Bitcoin’s unique characteristics make it an attractive addition to corporate treasuries. It can balance exposure to traditional assets like cash, stocks, and bonds.

Bitcoin is also one of the most liquid assets globally, and its historical performance has shown significant long-term value appreciation — it reached an all-time high of over $108,000 on Dec. 17.

But there’s no shortage of risks.

A board might avoid adopting a Bitcoin treasury due to the coin’s extreme price volatility, which can lead to substantial losses during downturns. Also, regulatory uncertainties pose potential threats as governments refine crypto policies. Additionally, liquidity challenges during market slumps can amplify price drops when offloading assets.

So it’s no wonder that, on Dec. 10, Microsoft’s board channeled the long-standing crypto skepticism of its co-founder, Bill Gates, and recommended ditching the proposa for a Bitcoin trasury. Gates himself has famously dismissed crypto as “100% based on greater fool theory” — ouch.

Bitcoin evangelist and MicroStrategy Chairman Michael Saylor was busy trying to woo Microsoft when he touted Bitcoin’s own meteoric returns and bragged about MicroStrategy’s stock soaring after their BTC splurge. His pitch? Bitcoin could boost Microsoft’s market cap while acting as a financial guardian angel.

Microsoft’s response? No, thanks.

Meanwhile, at least 10 other companies are embracing the MicroStrategy playbook.

Genius Group

Genius Group, an AI-powered education group, announced in November that it had completed the purchase of 110 Bitcoin for $10 million, at an average price of $90,932 per Bitcoin. The purchase made good on a promise to employ what it called a “Bitcoin-first” strategy where it planed to commit 90% or more of its current and future reserves to be held in Bitcoin, with an initial target of $120 million in Bitcoin.

Earlier this month, the company bolstered its Bitcoin treasury by acquiring 194 Bitcoin worth $18 million at an average price of $92,728 per Bitcoin.

Genius Group CEO Roger Hamilton credited Saylor’s Bitcoin treasury plan for the inspiration, adding that “more companies will see the benefits of establishing a Bitcoin treasury, and will be equipped with the clear steps to follow.”

Worksport

Worksport, a U.S.-based provider of pickup truck solutions, is adding cyptocurency to its corporate treasury strategy.

The Nasdaq-listed company announced on Dec. 5 that it would be adding Bitcoin (BTC) and XRP (XRP) to its treasury assets. This follows a resolution by the company’s board of directors, which approved an initial purchase of $5 million worth of BTC and XRP.

Worksport is committing 10% of its excess operational cash to this corporate pivot, it said in the announcement.

“Our upcoming adoption of Bitcoin (BTC) and XRP (Ripple) reflects our commitment to staying ahead of market trends while prioritizing operational efficiency and shareholder value. As we expand our product offerings and global reach, cryptocurrency has the potential to be a strong strategic complement,” Steven Rossi, chief executive officer of Worksport, said.

Amazon

Amazon shareholders, led by the National Center for Public Policy Research, are urging the Seattle-based company’s board to assess the potential benefits of adding Bitcoin to the company’s financial strategy.

The proposal, submitted on Dec. 6, aims to explore whether Bitcoin could protect and enhance shareholder value, especially amid persistent inflation and declining yields from traditional assets.

The National Center emphasizes Bitcoin’s robust performance—131% growth in the past year and 1,246% over five years—as evidence of its potential as an inflation hedge and a growth asset. The initiative also highlights concerns about the diminishing purchasing power of Amazon’s $88 billion cash reserves due to average inflation of 4.95% over the past four years.

This move represents a broader trend of shareholder proposals influencing corporate policies, leveraging shareholder rights to advocate for financial strategies that address economic risks and enhance long-term value.

MicroStrategy

Perhaps the most vocal of all Bitcoin fans is MicroStrategy’s Saylor who, as of this past week, increased the company’s total holdings to 439,000.

As a result, Saylor has officially strengthening MicroStrategy’s position as the top corporate BTC holder, considering it a long-term store of value.

Saylor, during an appearance on the Dec. 18 episode of the Open Interest show on Bloomberg Television, even voiced his willingness to advise President-elect Donald Trump on crafting a digital assets policy for the U.S.

But Saylor continues to draw scrutiny: Analyst Jacob King has labeled MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin-focused business model a “giant scam,” claiming it is unsustainable and destined for collapse.

Marathon Digital Holdings

As one of the largest Bitcoin mining companies, Marathon owns 44,394 BTC. Its business model revolves entirely around mining and holding Bitcoin as part of its assets​.

Back in July, the company confirmed it will adopt “a full HODL approach” towards its Bitcoin treasury policy, retaining all that it mines within its operations, in addition to its open market purchases.

“Adopting a full HODL strategy reflects our confidence in the long-term value of bitcoin,” CEO Fred Thiel stated. “We believe bitcoin is the world’s best treasury reserve asset and support the idea of sovereign wealth funds holding it. We encourage governments and corporations to all hold bitcoin as a reserve asset.”

Tesla

Tesla initially bought $1.5 billion worth of Bitcoin in 2021 and currently holds 9,720 BTC. While the Elon Musk-led company remains a significant corporate holder​.

BitcoinTreasuries data shows that Tesla is the fourth-largest holder of Bitcoin among U.S. public companies with crypto treasuries (MicroStrategy, MARA Holdings and Riot Platforms are believed to hold more).

In October, the electric vehicle company reportedly moved $765 million worth of Bitcoin to unidentified wallets.

Coinbase

The cryptocurrency exchange holds 9,480 BTC as part of its reserves, leveraging its position as a major player in the digital asset ecosystem​.

The Brian Armstrong-led firm holds large amounts of Bitcoin as an exchange and converter. It’s also a trusted institution for custody services, and counts the Bitcoin ETF coterie of BlackRock, Grayscale, 21Shares, Invesco, Valkyrie, Wisdom Tree and Franklin Templeton among its clients.

Therefore, Coinbase has a Bitcoin treasury for itself and oversees others.

Hut 8 Mining Corp

On Thursday, crypto.news reported that Hut 8, a Bitcoin mining company, added 990 Bitcoin to its reserves.

The company spent roughly $100 million to increase its total holdings to 10,096 BTC. The reserve, now valued at over $1 billion, places Hut 8 among the largest corporate Bitcoin holders globally.

The company, under the guidance of CEO Asher Genoot, purchased the coins at an average price of $101,710, significantly higher than its cumulative acquisition cost of $24,484 per Bitcoin.

Block Inc.

The startup (formerly Square) holds 8,027 BTC as part of its strategy to integrate Bitcoin into mainstream finance.

The Jack Dorsey-founded company is so bullish on Bitcoin that, last month, it confirmed a company-wide pivot towards the cryptocurrency mining sector.

Block decided to dial down resources towards music streaming service TIDAL, and sunset TBD, a venture focusing on decentralizing the internet, to focus on expanding its presence in the Bitcoin mining sector.

Block acquired TIDAL in a 2021 acquisition for roughly $300 million. The platform has continued to struggle, with reports indicating workforce reductions and a $132.3 million impairment charge.

OneMedNet

OneMedNet Corp., as of Nov. 12, owns some 34 Bitcoins.

Off The Chain Capital, an investor in OneMedNet, was also inspired by Saylor, betting that Bitcoin isn’t just a hedge but a springboard for its healthcare data innovation.

Aaron Green, the company’s CEO, stated, “By continuing to invest a portion of our assets into Bitcoin, we aim to not only safeguard our financial stability but also fuel the ongoing development and innovation within our iRWD platform.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

Trump taps crypto bros to be in charge: What’s at stake?

Published

on



As President-elect Donald Trump prepares for a second term, his incoming administration has already nominated several crypto-friendly faces for key leadership roles.

Voters who bought into the Republican rhetoric that the Biden administration led a so-called “war on crypto” are likely excited. After all, Trump is the first elected official to hawk his own digital currency.

While cryptocurrency awareness is relatively high in the U.S., most Americans remain disinterested. According to a Pew Research study, roughly six-in-10 Americans (63%) say “they have little to no confidence that current ways to invest in, trade or use cryptocurrencies are reliable and safe.”

But with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission poised for an overhaul, and a slate of cryptocurrency advocates (listed below) jockeying for cabinet or council positions, the era of crypto cronyism within the U.S. executive branch is upon us — whether Americans like it or not.

What could go wrong?

Scott Bessent

Trump’s nominee for Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, is a well-known cryptocurrency advocate. The former Soros Fund Management CIO made headlines when he expressed excitement about crypto’s potential to revolutionize finance, aligning it with Republican ideals of freedom and innovation.

The 62-year-old hedge fund manager has been vocal about distancing crypto’s future from the likes of Sam Bankman-Fried, framing Bitcoin (BTC) as a unifying economic opportunity for younger generations disillusioned by traditional markets.

Should Bessent be at the helm of the Treasury, he would likely shake up digital assets and reduce the risk of severe tariffs.

Howard Lutnick

Cantor Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick, Trump’s pick for Commerce Secretary, is reportedly in talks with Tether, the largest stablecoin operator, to spearhead a $2 billion lending initiative.

Known for steering Cantor Fitzgerald into crypto trading, Lutnick’s embrace of digital assets demonstrates his knack for blending traditional finance with emerging technologies. If the Tether partnership materializes, it could expand access to capital while deepening the role of stablecoins in global financial systems under Lutnick’s leadership.

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy

Trump’s audacious proposal to create the “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) has drawn attention not just for its acronym, but for the crypto bulls that wish to be at the helm.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a longtime proponent of Dogecoin (DOGE), and biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy are tasked with slashing $2 trillion annually from federal programs like Medicare and Social Security. Ramaswamy has proposed deleting entire agencies.

While Congress must greenlight the department’s formation, it’s worth noting that it’s a real possibility considering the GOP’s majority in the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives.

Brad Garlinghouse

Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse praised Trump for nominating Bessent as “Treasury Sec.”

But Garlinghouse, himself, is a prominent player in Trump’s crypto strategy. He reportedly held discussions with Trump’s inner circle, suggesting he could — or has had — some say in hiring decisions.

In addition to advocating for the removal of SEC Chair Gary Gensler, Garlinghouse envisions a digital asset market structure bill moving forward in the Senate.

Brian Armstrong

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong met with Trump, according to Reuters. While it’s unclear what they discussed, reports suggest Armstrong is keen on joining Trump’s planned Bitcoin and crypto presidential advisory council.

Either way, Armstrong is voicing his thoughts on who should be in charge. Earlier this month, he tossed out the idea of replacing Gensler with SEC commissioner Hester Peirce, aka “Crypto Mom” in the crypto world, who’s been throwing some serious shade at Gensler’s crackdown.

And if Peirce isn’t available, there’s always Republican SEC commissioner Mark Uyeda, who once teamed up with her to rebuke the agency for what they consider “misguided and overreaching” cases against crypto companies.

Jeremy Allaire

Allaire, the chief executive of the crypto company Circle, is also interested in joining the council. According to the New York Times, Allaire and other crypto pros are hounding Trump’s camp for more information.

Allaire was even excited when Trump said he wasn’t a fan of Bitcoin back in 2019.

Other entrepreneurs are following Allaire’s lead. One executive told the Times on background that he’s “harassing everyone” he knows in Trumpworld with the hope of landing a seat on the crypto council.





Source link

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

Gensler to resign as SEC chair: What’s next under Trump?

Published

on



Gary Gensler, the high-profile and often polarizing chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, announced his resignation, effective the day President-elect Donald Trump takes office.

Here’s the announcement on X:

Gensler’s decision is hardly unexpected for those attuned to Washington’s political rhythms. Leadership changes at federal agencies often coincide with the arrival of a new administration, especially when there’s an ideological shift. 

Here’s a closer look at the situation.

Gensler’s crackdown on crypto

Although Gensler’s term was slated to run through 2026, his resignation aligns with these unwritten rules of political transitions.

Gensler’s tenure, which began in 2021 under President Joe Biden, has been anything but uneventful. Known for his bold and uncompromising regulatory stance, he led an unprecedented crackdown on the crypto industry—a sector he once described as “rife with fraud and hucksters.”

Under his leadership, the SEC initiated a record 46 enforcement actions against crypto-related entities in 2023 alone, a 53% increase from 2022. 

Some of the crypto-related lawsuits filed seemed reasonable. For example, the SEC’s case against Terraform Labs involved allegations of a massive fraud scheme. In June, a federal jury ruled against Terraform and its co-founder Do Kwon. They were ordered to pay over $4.5 billion in penalties, the largest ever imposed in a crypto-related case.

While some applauded his efforts to bring order to the industry, Gensler’s critics often accuse him of regulatory overreach and stifling innovation, particularly when it comes to cases against Ripple (XRP) and Coinbase.

Trump, whose family launched a crypto startup this year, vocalized his disdain for Gensler on the campaign trail and pledged to replace him “on day one.”

Dan Gallagher, Robinhood Markets’ chief legal officer, was considered a possible replacement for Gensler, but he is no longer interested.

As the SEC prepares for this leadership change, the agency faces critical questions about its future direction. What does Gensler’s departure mean for financial regulation in the U.S.? Who will take the reins, and how will their approach shape the nation’s financial landscape?

When Gensler confirmed his resignation, social media — particularly crypto enthusiasts populating X — erupted with tweets that ranged from bitter resentment to cautious relief. 

Many within the crypto community didn’t hold back, particularly supporters of Ripple. Known as the “XRP Army,” they had long blamed Gensler for the SEC’s aggressive lawsuit against Ripple Labs, which tanked the value of XRP and dragged the community into a years-long legal battle. 

“Congratulations to the XRP Army—this is the moment we’ve been waiting for,” one XRP supporter tweeted.

Criticism extended beyond XRP, with retail investors calling Gensler’s tenure “the most destructive period in SEC history.” They cite his initial resistance to approving a Bitcoin (BTC) ETF and his handling of smaller investor disputes, such as the MMTLP stockholder case.

Adding to the backlash, the same post referenced a federal judge’s reported reprimand of the SEC in another enforcement case, framing it as a reflection of Gensler’s heavy-handed and controversial approach. 

“Thank you for protecting no one from actual scams. You set America back years in crypto,” another social media user quipped.

High-profile industry figures also joined the chorus of criticism. Justin Sun, the founder of Tron (TRX), took a harsher tone, calling Gensler’s resignation “too late” and lamenting the “massive damage” he allegedly inflicted on U.S. markets and the global economy.

In the end, Gensler’s exit isn’t just the close of a contentious chapter; it’s the start of a critical transition for the SEC and the industries it oversees.

Who will lead the SEC next?

With Gensler’s resignation, the focus is shifting to who will succeed him—a decision that could reshape the future of crypto regulation in the U.S.

Journalist Eleanor Terrett of Fox Business has suggested that the next SEC chair may bring a fresh outlook on crypto. 

According to her sources, the incoming administration is prioritizing a candidate who is “pro-crypto” yet equipped to handle the SEC’s broader responsibilities, including oversight of public companies, stock and bond markets, and private funds.

Among the leading contenders is Paul Atkins, a former SEC commissioner known for his free-market philosophy and favorable stance on crypto. 

Charles Gasparino of Fox Business reported that Atkins is currently viewed as a frontrunner, buoyed by strong support from both the business and crypto communities. 

Atkins’ approach stands in stark contrast to Gensler’s enforcement-heavy style. While critics argue that Atkins may be too lenient, his supporters believe his leadership would promote innovation by lowering regulatory barriers.

Another prominent name in the running is Robert Stebbins, a partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher and former SEC General Counsel under Jay Clayton. 

Stebbins is widely regarded as a steady and pragmatic candidate, offering deep legal and regulatory expertise. While his pro-crypto stance is less favorable than Atkins’, his previous experience at the SEC gives him credibility with both policymakers and financial institutions.

Teresa Goody Guillén is also emerging as a potential candidate. A veteran of the SEC and a partner at BakerHostetler, where she co-leads the blockchain practice. 

Crypto companies are reportedly advocating for her nomination, confident that her dual experience as an SEC insider and blockchain advocate would bring a balanced perspective to the role.

Brian Brooks, the former Acting Comptroller of the Currency, is another notable name being floated for key financial regulatory positions, including the SEC chair. 

Dubbed the “Crypto Comptroller” for his blockchain-friendly policies during his tenure at the OCC, Brooks has been a vocal proponent of integrating crypto into mainstream banking. 

While Terrett noted that Brooks is under consideration for multiple roles beyond the SEC, his appointment here could signal a transformative period for crypto regulation.

Interestingly, the shakeup may not be limited to the SEC. Terrett suggests that the Trump administration is exploring an expanded role for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in crypto oversight. 

Such a move could involve splitting regulatory responsibilities between the SEC and CFTC—or even transferring primary authority to the CFTC entirely. 

However, as Terrett pointed out, this shift would require a colossal increase in funding for the CFTC, which currently lacks the resources to manage such an expansive mandate. For now, speculation continues.

Preparing for the change

Gensler’s resignation has left crypto industry insiders speculating about what lies ahead, with many experts pointing to a mix of challenges and opportunities. 

Slava Demchuk, CEO of AMLBot, in a conversation with crypto.news talked about one of the most pressing issues: the lack of clear rules for crypto in the U.S., especially compared to the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation

“Without clear regulations, crypto companies have been left in limbo, unable to fully understand compliance requirements or attract major institutional players.”

One particularly thorny problem is crypto companies’ struggles to access banking services. Niko Demchuk, Head of Legal at AMLBot, described how banks in the U.S. are often hesitant to work with crypto firms due to the risk of regulatory fallout. 

“Banks don’t want to associate with companies that might be out of compliance. Even indirect ties to crypto can bring scrutiny or fines, creating bottlenecks for the industry, making it difficult for businesses to perform everyday financial operations.”

If the next chair adopts a more crypto-friendly stance, there’s potential for key improvements, including clearer regulations, better access to banking, and a more welcoming environment for innovation. 

The prospect of a regulatory framework similar to the EU’s MiCA is also gaining traction. Experts believe that such a framework could bring greater consistency to the U.S. market, addressing issues like cybersecurity, anti-money laundering, and market manipulation. 

For crypto companies, this transitional period is an opportunity to get ahead and focus on strengthening compliance systems, enhancing know-your-customer processes, and investing in tools like transaction monitoring. 

“Businesses need to be proactive. Regulatory changes are coming, and those who are prepared will have a smoother adjustment,” Demchuk added.

For crypto firms, the time to act is now—because what comes next could reshape the future of the crypto industry in the U.S. and across the globe.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon