Bitcoin (BTC) has always been the face of crypto, the first thing that comes to mind when you think of this market. But for years, its role has been largely static—held as a store of value, yet rarely used for anything else. Then BTCFi entered the scene: unlike traditional DeFi, which has been dominated by Ethereum (ETH) and other smart contract platforms, BTCFi is built around Bitcoin as the core asset.

In the last quarter of 2024, BTCFi’s total value saw a massive surge—from $800 million all the way to $6.5 billion. The momentum is impressive, to say the least. More institutional players are taking notice, and analysts predict that by 2030, roughly 2.3% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply (about $47 billion) could be actively used in decentralized finance. 

So clearly, BTCFi is not just a passing trend. But why is it gaining so much traction? Can it really be called the future of Bitcoin’s utility as a financial asset?

Let’s try to figure it out.

What is BTCFi, and why is it growing now?

BTCFi represents the intersection of Bitcoin and decentralized finance, with the first crypto playing the role of the core asset in this case. Typically, DeFi platforms have been built on blockchains like Ethereum, while Bitcoin holders had to wrap their BTC into ERC-20 tokens (like wBTC) to participate in this field.

This kind of tokenization started picking up the pace around 2020, allowing BTC holders to access DeFi services that are typically not available on the Bitcoin blockchain. These “wrapped” tokens are built in a way that makes them compatible with other blockchain networks. And so, they effectively extended Bitcoin’s functionality.

However, advancements in Bitcoin L2 solutions and LRTs, or layered rollup technologies, are now changing the rules. It is becoming unnecessary for Bitcoin to use “second class citizen” ERC-20 tokens anymore.

BTC LRTs, for example, operate on Ethereum and other chains as well, but use Bitcoin as the primary collateral in transactions. This means unlocking the use of Bitcoin as a yield-generating asset in other networks beyond its native chain.

The emerging Bitcoin L2s, meanwhile, are tackling this blockchain’s long-standing scalability issues, allowing for faster and more cost-efficient transactions. These innovations are going to fundamentally redefine Bitcoin, turning it from a passive store of value to an actively utilized financial asset.

Why is BTCFi the gateway for Bitcoin whales in 2025?

Large Bitcoin holders—miners, in particular—have often used CeFi loans backed by their BTCs to fund their operations since they didn’t want to outright sell those assets. This practice is still going on today, but BTCFi promises to make some changes. And that’s where everything will start from, really: by BTCFi enabling new opportunities for Bitcoin holders to put their assets to work.

Soon enough, Bitcoin whales will start looking at BTCFi as a powerful gateway that can be used to enter the DeFi space. And the way I see it, there are two key factors in 2025 that will influence that perception.

The first is the rise of Bitcoin ETFs. BTC ETFs currently account for almost 6% of all Bitcoin supply, having crossed $100 billion in holdings at the beginning of 2025. With them gaining mainstream traction, Bitcoin is increasingly perceived as the safest and most stable cryptocurrency asset.

This makes it a prime choice for DeFi, attracting large-scale holders who want to use their BTC without selling. Earlier in February this year, Goldman Sachs announced that it had invested $1.63 billion in Bitcoin ETFs. That’s easy proof right there.

The second major factor is the appearance of BTC L2 technologies, which we’ve already covered earlier. Until recently, the lack of scalability and transaction efficiency held Bitcoin back from DeFi adoption. Now, we are going to see a surge of L2 solutions that will enhance the network’s performance. And here’s the important part: they will do so while preserving Bitcoin’s core principles of decentralization and simplicity (and, hence, its robustness).

What DeFi platforms need to do for proper BTCFi integration

There are several challenges that will need to be overcome before BTCFi can achieve truly seamless integration. The biggest technical issue will be ensuring that Bitcoin-based L2 solutions become genuinely trustless. At the present time, they are not quite there, often relying on intermediaries and centralized elements, which goes against Bitcoin’s core philosophy.

The good news is that there’s a lot of R&D going on to make it happen. If successful, it could make the vast amounts of BTCs that are currently just lying there “collecting dust” be useful in DeFi.

Another big challenge is going to stem from people’s trust. Among Bitcoin holders, there are many who do not quite trust Ethereum and the existing Bitcoin tokenization methods. The key to winning them over will lie in creating robust and cost-effective solutions on the native Bitcoin network. Having a fully trustless and inexpensive execution layer on the BTC blockchain could really become the dealbreaker for these people.

The future of Bitcoin: More than just ‘digital gold’

For years, Bitcoin has been carrying the moniker of “digital gold”—a safe-haven asset meant for holding rather than using. These days, this is becoming increasingly untrue. As more institutional players enter the crypto space, the potential for BTCFi to become Bitcoin’s next-level evolution is very real.

The demand is on the rise, and the infrastructure is already being built. For Bitcoin whales looking to maximize their assets without selling, BTCFi could become the perfect answer.

Michael Egorov

Michael Egorov is a physicist, entrepreneur, and crypto maximalist who stood at the origins of DeFi creation. He is a founder of Curve Finance, a decentralized exchange designed for efficient and low-slippage trading of stablecoins. Since the inception of Curve Finance in 2020, Michael has developed all his solutions and products independently. His extensive scientific experience in physics, software engineering, and cryptography aids him in product creation. Today, Curve Finance is one of the top three DeFi exchanges regarding the total volume of funds locked in smart contracts.

Donald Trump’s upcoming “Liberation Day” tariff announcement is being framed by some experts as a reset of global trade and could have negative implications for crypto.

While much of the attention is focused on the political fallout and trade disruptions, the broader consequences for digital assets, and the global frameworks that support them, deserve a closer look.

Heidi Crebo-Rediker, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, recently described on Bloomberg TV U.S. President Donald Trump’s plans as a “tearing up” of existing free trade agreements with America’s closest allies. This includes the so-called “Dirty 15”, a group of major trading partners that together make up 80% of U.S. trade.

Trump’s proposed system, built on unilateral tariffs and non-tariff barriers, represents a complete shift away from the cooperative global order that has defined the last several decades of international trade.

Why does this matter for crypto?

Crypto is inherently cross-border. Its infrastructure, users, capital flows, and regulatory frameworks depend on global alignment and relatively open markets. Any shift toward economic fragmentation risks disrupting that progress.

Crebo-Rediker notes that countries like Canada are already preparing to diversify away from the U.S., bracing for a reconfiguration of trade and investment relationships. In this new era, markets could become more closed, regulation more inconsistent, and capital controls more common.

She may agree (I don’t know), but these are all hostile conditions for crypto adoption. She also warns of a broader retreat from the multilateral frameworks that underpin both global finance and regulatory cooperation.

If America turns inward while allies look elsewhere, especially towards China, which is positioning itself as a defender of the global system – it could weaken the West’s influence over digital asset standards.

Crypto advocates have cheered Trump’s recent embrace of stablecoins and digital finance, but they should be cautious. A fragmented world, with each country pulling in a different direction on trade and tech, is not a world where crypto can thrive.

Forget about Michael Saylor’s vision of Bitcoin surpassing a $200 trillion market cap and we can only hope it can hold on to a $1 trillion valuation.

If global coordination erodes, so too might the prospects for crypto’s next wave of adoption. If so, it was a fun run. If not, I’ll be glad to admit being wrong.

The synergy of political endorsement and highly speculative assets like meme coins was always bound to be disastrous, and the recent LIBRA scandal was a clear reflection of this concern.

Crypto has come a long way over the past decade. Mainstream adoption, institutional interest, and regulatory clarity helped the industry gain increasing credibility. And meme coins also carved out an exciting niche in this sector, which reflected creativity and community engagement. Yet, political meme coins could ruin this decades-worth of progress very quickly.

A promotional post from Argentina’s president, Javier Milei, caused LIBRA investors to lose over $250 million in just hours. His endorsement sparked a buying frenzy that pushed the price from near zero to almost $5 in a matter of minutes. Insiders quickly cashed out, dumping over $107 million in tokens before the price collapsed. Argentina’s fintech chamber labeled this classic rug pull without mincing words.

The Anatomy of a Meme Coin Scam

Unfortunately, the LIBRA scandal was not an exceptional case. Bubblemap analysts traced LIBRA’s origins back to the team behind the MELANIA token and other pump-and-dump schemes. The same group launched several coins that swelled in price before crashing.

President Milei, a self-proclaimed libertarian and Bitcoin enthusiast, used his platform to share information about LIBRA. His tweet ignited a rush among investors eager to capitalize on his reputation.

It’s still staggering that influential figures have yet to understand the true impact of their statements on an industry largely driven by speculative interest. As the token’s value soared, insiders began unloading their tokens. Within hours, the coin’s market cap fell from $4.5 billion to just a fraction of that amount.

However, on-chain analysis shows that LIBRA was fundamentally designed to potentially scam investors. The founders held 70% of the token supply, which allowed them to profit massively while leaving retail investors vulnerable. When insiders cashed out, many traders lost nearly everything they had invested.

Such pump-and-dump schemes always follow the same playbook: a high-profile personality sparks investor interest, insiders pocket their profits, and the token collapses. This pattern played out with LIBRA in a textbook fashion.

Political Endorsements and Market Manipulation

Political endorsements used in these schemes add a disturbing twist to the story. Milei’s tweet did more than spread a message; it lent credibility to a high-risk asset. When a sitting president supports a project, many assume there is underlying merit. This assumption helped drive the buying frenzy around LIBRA. Similar episodes occurred in the United States with the TRUMP and MELANIA tokens. Politically-linked meme coins have morphed from mere speculative plays into tools for financial manipulation.

Galaxy Research Analyst Alex Thorn describes LIBRA as the latest example of a series of Solana-based meme coin implosions. During this crash, Solana’s transaction volumes plummeted to mid-2024 levels, and there is growing concern over a $1.5 billion FTX token unlock. These factors combine to put additional pressure on Solana’s price.

Meme coins, which dominated headlines in 2024, now face harsh market realities in 2025. Many of these tokens have already lost 30-60% of their value. Activity on platforms such as Pump.fun has cratered, and overall trading volume in the sector is in freefall.

The trend of politically-endorsed tokens creates an environment where hype easily overrides fundamentals. Political figures lend their names to projects with little oversight. This practice allows groups of insiders to generate large profits at the expense of everyday investors.

The situation exposes a troubling trend in crypto markets. When prominent figures use their influence to spark buying frenzies, they turn volatile tokens into weapons for financial manipulation. Such practices risk undermining trust in the entire crypto ecosystem.

A Much-Needed End to the Chaotic Meme Coin Cycle? 

The $LIBRA debacle should serve as a harsh lesson for retail investors. Many of those who lost money had a high level of technical knowledge, as they needed Solana wallets and SOL tokens to participate.

However, the overall appeal of politically charged tokens often attracts investors who believe that an endorsement from a political heavyweight guarantees success. Reality proved otherwise. When high-profile insiders exploit their inside knowledge to exit early, the outcome is disastrous for retail participants.

As institutional investors shift their focus to more stable markets like Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, the appetite for meme coins might be waning. Political meme coins remain the lawless frontier of crypto. Their volatile nature and inherent manipulation make them a poor choice for risk-averse investors. The recent fallout suggests that market excitement has finally run far ahead of sound fundamentals.

Political meme coins represent a clear symptom of a larger problem. They expose vulnerabilities in a market that still lacks a solid regulatory framework. When the excitement around a meme coin overshadows careful analysis, the consequences can be severe. Investors may see short-term gains, but the inevitable collapse brings long-term damage. The case of $LIBRA proves that political endorsements do not safeguard against market manipulation.