In a potential sign of brewing tensions regarding key language in multiple stablecoin bills circulating in Congress, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) said this week he doesn’t believe stablecoin issuers like Tether should have to comply with the anti-money laundering Bank Secrecy Act—a major sticking point of both the Senate’s stablecoin-focused GENIUS Act, and the House’s parallel STABLE Act. 

Including such a provision in the legislation would unfairly box out foreign issuers, Emmer argues. The lawmaker believes stablecoin issuers, regardless of jurisdiction, should not be subject to the stringent anti-money laundering rules under the Bank Secrecy Act.

“The protections the so-called Bank Secrecy Act is supposed to provide were drafted for cash, and this is blockchain-driven,” Emmer told Decrypt Wednesday evening. “And guess what, everything on the blockchain is open and transparent to people who understand how to follow code.”

“It’s pretty interesting to say that the Bank Secrecy Act—which doesn’t even contemplate this type of technology, a digital asset—should be what we’re using,” the congressman added. 

Stablecoins are digital assets typically pegged to the U.S. dollar and designed to keep a steady price. They’re used by cryptocurrency traders to enter and exit positions without the need for dollars, and used as dollar equivalents in markets where dollars are restricted or inaccessible.

The latest drafts of the GENIUS Act and STABLE Act treat all stablecoin issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act. The law, enacted in 1970, established a stringent set of proactive anti-money laundering rules that American banks must comply with in order to operate. 

The Bank Secrecy Act, for example, obligates regulated institutions to engage in suspicious activity monitoring, undergo routine audits, hire compliance officers, and adopt a customer identification program mandated by the Patriot Act—the controversial law that expanded government surveillance powers shortly after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Such requirements would pose quite a hurdle for existing foreign stablecoin issuers like Tether, the company behind USDT and the market’s undisputed leader. Tether, whose USDT stablecoin boasts a market capitalization in excess of $144 billion, is based in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and plans to move to El Salvador—but nonetheless is one of the world’s biggest purchasers of U.S. Treasuries, which it uses as collateral to back its U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin.

In its current setup, Tether enjoys much less strict regulation than the Bank Secrecy Act would mandate, and the company’s leadership has implied that moves to force all stablecoin issuers to comply with such rules would hurt the firm and aid its competitors. By contrast, Circle, the issuer behind the market’s second-largest stablecoin USDC, is already based in the United States. While Circle does not yet comply with the Bank Secrecy Act, the company is regulated as a money transmitter by the New York Department of Financial Services.

Circle is also already in compliance with the European Union’s elaborate MiCA regulatory framework, a move Tether has resisted.

As stablecoin legislation in the U.S. nears a crescendo, questions have emerged regarding whether Tether would come to the United States if it had to comply with the Bank Secrecy Act—or, alternatively, what would happen if the stablecoin market’s top player was boxed out of American financial markets. 

Emmer does not want to risk locking Tether, or any other foreign issuer, out of the burgeoning U.S. stablecoin sector. 

“We’ve got to let everybody compete in this space,” he said. 

That doesn’t mean Tether wouldn’t have to comply with certain rules in order to operate in the United States. To Emmer, the sticking point is proof of reserves—showing the government that your token is backed up with sufficient collateral to keep its value pegged to the dollar even in periods of market volatility. 

To that end, Emmer believes Tether is, broadly speaking, doing well. In 2021, the company partnered with Wall Street firm Cantor Fitzgerald to help custody some of the $92 billion worth of U.S. Treasuries it claims to currently hold in reserve. 

“Tether has done a great job straightening itself out in the last four years,” Emmer said. 

The House Financial Services Committee is set to mark up the STABLE Act during a session next week. Meanwhile, the GENIUS Act already passed out of the Senate Banking Committee earlier this month with strong bipartisan support—Bank Secrecy language intact. It is likely to face a full vote on the Senate floor in the coming months.

The U.S. SEC on Thursday dismissed enforcement actions against three major crypto firms, filing joint stipulations to drop the cases with prejudice, making the decisions final and not subject to refile.

Kraken, ConsenSys, and Cumberland DRW LLC all saw their respective lawsuits terminated simultaneously, marking the latest reversal in the agency’s regulatory approach toward digital assets.

The regulator has also officially closed its case against the exchange Crypto.com.

Disclaimer: ConsenSys is one of 22 investors in an editorially independent Decrypt.

The dismissals form part of a broader pivot in U.S. crypto regulation under the Trump administration, following similar ends to cases against Coinbase, Robinhood, Uniswap Labs, and OpenSea.

In a statement following the dismissal of civil enforcement action against Coinbase, acting SEC Chairman Mark T. Uyeda said these decisions were part of the agency’s “ongoing efforts” to “rectify its approach” and develop crypto policy in a “more transparent manner.”

Notably, the SEC emphasized that these dismissals do not “necessarily reflect the Commission’s position on any other case.”

The decision ends a “wasteful, politically motivated campaign,” Kraken said in a statement when the resolution for their case with the regulator arrived. 

Kraken further characterized the SEC’s move as something that lifted “uncertainty” over what could have “stifled innovation and investment.”

The exchange provider later revealed its prospects of going public, potentially coming in as the second crypto firm to do so after Coinbase.

The resolution ends a tumultuous period for the industry. Each of the three companies had faced serious allegations under the prior Gensler regime.

Kraken was charged in November 2023 with operating an unregistered securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency.

ConsenSys faced accusations in June 2024 of unlawfully offering securities through its MetaMask Staking service.

Cumberland DRW, a Chicago-based trading firm, was sued in October 2024 for allegedly acting as an unregistered dealer handling over $2 billion in crypto assets.

Under acting Chairman Uyeda, the SEC had established a task force and actively engaged with the crypto industry, signaling a departure from the previous administration’s enforcement-focused approach.

Edited by Sebastian Sinclair

On Wednesday, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) took aim at a stablecoin-focused bill making its way through Congress, accusing U.S. President Donald Trump of using the legislation to further his own financial interests.

The Massachusetts senator shared the critique while linking a post about President Trump’s decentralized finance project, World Liberty Financial, launching its own stablecoin USD1 on Ethereum and Binance’s BNB Chain.

Warren voiced her concerns on social media, claiming President Trump is leveraging the project as a “grift” to “enrich” himself. 

“Congress should step up and fix the current stablecoin bill moving through the Senate that will make it easier for Trump—and Elon Musk—to take control of your money,” Warren wrote, criticizing the “Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act” (FIT21) bill.

The FIT21 bill seeks to create a clear regulatory framework for digital assets, with U.S. Rep. French Hill (R-AR) mentioning that in the “next few days,” legislators will roll out a revised bill.

In the meantime, the Trump administration is moving to make the U.S. the “crypto capital of the world” through a series of initiatives, including the creation of a SEC Task Force dedicated to overseeing digital asset regulations. 

President Trump also called for “simple, common-sense rules for stablecoins and market structure” during a video call at the Blockworks crypto conference in New York last Thursday.

The stablecoin market currently holds over $238 billion in circulation, as per CoinGecko data, with Tether (USDT) making up a significant portion. 

Trump’s crypto czar, David Sacks, has previously promised to introduce legislation on stablecoins and market structures within the first 100 days of Trump’s second term.

The Massachusetts senator recently challenged Sacks to prove he’s not “directly profiting off of the Trump Administration’s efforts to selectively pump the value of certain crypto assets,” as he claimed he sold all his crypto assets before beginning in his role as crypto czar.

Elon Musk’s influence within the government, particularly through his role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has only fueled Warren’s concerns. 

The initiative, which Musk heads, aims to reduce government bureaucracy and eliminate excess regulations, but it has faced criticism for potentially giving Musk—and by extension, his business interests—a disproportionate amount of influence over U.S. financial policy.

In January, Warren lambasted DOGE in a letter to the Dogecoin aficionado, accusing the department of being a potential “venue for corruption.” 

The senator’s letter to Musk suggested a range of changes, including cracking down on tax loopholes for the wealthy and reforming government contracts to cut wasteful spending.

Edited by Sebastian Sinclair