Connect with us

Culture

The Politics of Bitcoin Development

Published

on



In a recent conversation with Christian Decker from Blockstream, Bitcoin Magazine’s Shinobi delved into the intricate politics of Bitcoin development. Decker, a lead Lightning developer, provided a candid look at the current competitive atmosphere where developers often find themselves entangled in political maneuvering rather than engineering matters. 

Decker did not mince words when describing the challenges developers face. “We have been trying way too long to be clever in as much that we try to sidestep the discussion of whether we want covenants, what kind of covenants we want, or introspection, as we like to call it,” he said. The community’s cleverness has led to fragmented efforts, with narrowly focused proposals struggling to gain traction amidst limited review cycles and intense competition.

Towards a new approach 

A major problem, Decker explained, is the combative environment where developers often have to “badmouth other proposals in order for your proposal to grab the attention that is needed to get your proposal through.” This creates unnecessary tension and frustration. Rusty Russell’s recent proposal, however, offers a refreshing change. It aims to restore Bitcoin’s original scripting functionality, providing a more unified and collaborative approach.

Decker emphasized the importance of involving the broader Bitcoin community in these discussions. “If it’s just seriously discussed, I think that can be an incredibly healthy thing for the larger and wider ecosystem’s involvement,” he said. Moving towards a cooperative direction where all stakeholders openly discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of proposed changes can foster a healthier ecosystem. This makes it harder for people to dismiss ideas based on superficial associations and encourages a more honest and transparent dialogue.

The proposal to bring back Bitcoin’s original script functionality is about “giving everybody the tools to build whatever they want” without being restrictive. Decker believes this approach will lead to more meaningful and efficient optimizations over time. “It might be inefficient the way that you can do arbitrary things, but you can at least show your work and you can show it works,” he explained. Once these solutions are demonstrated, the community will naturally come together to optimize and improve performance.

Both Shinobi and Decker agreed on the need to rely on subject matter experts in these technical discussions. However, they also emphasized the importance of these experts presenting a balanced view of their proposals’ pros and cons. Decker pointed out that the current environment often incentivizes experts to present a one-sided picture, which can mislead the community. “In Bitcoin, until now, you always had to be very loud, you had to be very salesy, and you always had to present this, this is the upside of mine, but there’s the downsides of everybody else,” he said. This competitive atmosphere has hindered honest and transparent discussions.

Engineering first

Rusty’s proposal represents a significant shift in the way Bitcoin’s development community approaches script enhancements. By re-enabling the script’s original functionality, the community can move away from politicking and towards a more collaborative and innovative future. As Decker puts it, “Let’s approach this as engineers, which is what most of us are, and not as propagandists or salespeople trying to sort of just get your stuff done.”

This conversation sheds light on the ongoing efforts to improve Bitcoin’s scripting capabilities and underscores the importance of cooperation and honest dialogue in achieving these goals. As the Bitcoin community continues to evolve, proposals like Rusty’s offer a promising path forward for enabling more flexible and programmable money on the Bitcoin network.



Source link

4th Of July

Liberty Doesn't Ask For Permission

Published

on



Today is America’s Independence Day, a celebration of our freedom from the British Empire and the tyranny of a bureaucracy removed by thousands of miles of ocean ruling over our lives. The Revolutionary War that won us that freedom is not something that happened overnight, or something that just sparked due to one event or circumstance in the short term, it was the result of over a century of an overbearing government influence on the colonists that resided in North America.

In the same way, Bitcoin was not a thing born out of the singular event of the Great Financial Crisis. Just like colonists for over a century dealing with increasing taxes, overbearing regulations, and general exploitation birthed the United States, decades of parasitic economic and financial actions birthed Bitcoin.

While America and the struggles that led to its creation were rooted in a bureaucracy disconnected by physical distance, Bitcoin was born from troubles rooted in a more existential disconnection rather than one of physical space. In the same way the King and his advisors in England had a disconnected and impersonal view of the human beings on the other side of the Atlantic, today’s bureaucrats have a disconnected and mechanical view of the human beings they rule over despite the lack of physical distance.

Politicians, regulators, bureaucrats, financial executives, none of them see the people they rule over, or make decisions drastically altering the course of their lives or circumstances, as actual people. They see numbers, they see statistics, they see stereotypes and generalizations. They see impersonal figures and patterns that someone seems to fit at a glance, and decide based on that.

They have no empathy, they have no understanding of an individual’s personal circumstances, or situation in life, or the problems they deal with because of automaton like decision making in the halls of Congress, or the SEC building, or a bank.

So why do we look to these people for approval, or a road to success, or some glimmer of hope that they will achieve that understanding? Imagine if a decade after achieving its independence America had turned back to England for help in achieving its success. Does that seem rational to you? Does that seem like a fruitful road to achieving success and prosperity?

The answer should be a resounding no. They don’t care about you, or me, or any of us.

So why do so many Bitcoiners look to these parasites and narcissists for salvation? It is an indication of completely losing the plot, the purpose of what Bitcoin was made for. In a way it is very similar to the current state of America as a nation, lost and disconnected from the purpose and ideals it was initially founded on. Liberty, self determination, justice.

These people are not here to help us, they are not here to turn Bitcoin into a beacon of individual liberty and freedom. They are here to exploit, to subvert, to maintain the position they hold in the world where they can remain callously disconnected from the rest of us in a position of security and luxury for themselves.

America was founded specifically because of the realization that England would not give them self determination or liberty. The founding fathers realized that, and so they set out to achieve it on their own terms, by building something new, something innovative that the world had never seen before.

Bitcoin is no different, but rather than holding fast to those principles and ideals, Bitcoiners seem content to go running back to England for permission to self determination. Asking permission to achieve their liberty.

This is a mistake. Bitcoin was created to be that new, independent, innovative thing the world has never seen before. It was built to stand on its own as a foundation of sovereignty, and self determination. Not something that we beg for permission to have, to build upon, to use.

We need to hold to that, not go begging politicians and regulators for an easy road to “success,” that in reality is simply a failure wrapped in a blanket of cope. Bitcoin is here, it was put here without asking for permission, without begging the King to allow it to be, and here it will stay.

Whether it succeeds or fails doesn’t come down to politicians, or regulators, or Wall Street money, it comes down to us.

Happy Fourth of July to those who still seek self determination instead of permission. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Culture

Palestinian Taxi Driver Uses Bitcoin To Save Civilians In Gaza

Published

on


Countless lives were changed on October 7th, 2023, and Yusef Mahmoud’s was no different. Even before the war, the Palestinian taxi driver couldn’t stand being a passive observer of unemployment and hunger, both prevalent in Gaza’s everyday life. In 2022 and early 2023, more than two million Gazans lacked access to clean water and an appropriate sewage system, while two-thirds of the population lived in poverty.

Against this backdrop, Yusef turned online for help. It was Ramadan of 2023 and he wondered if other Muslims across the globe would contribute with bitcoin, the first decentralized cryptocurrency, that he could use to buy and distribute food for those in need and toys for children in Gaza. UK-based Bitcoiner Fumble was amongst those who answered his call.

“I quickly saw that Yusef was genuinely transferring over the support he received to people on the ground,” Fumble recalls. “As Bitcoiners sent satoshis (bitcoin’s smaller monetary units) to Yusef, he returned pictures of the donations’ impact on elderly people and orphans around him. The more proof I saw of his work, the more I wanted to help, and that’s when I suggested Geyser as a means for Yusef to organize his initiative and scale up the project.”

In April 2023, Yusef launched a project on Geyser, a global Bitcoin crowdfunding platform, to raise more funds and provide food and potable water to Palestinian civilians in need.

https://x.com/Yusef_Mahmoud1/status/1794636953704698295

When the going got tougher, support followed

Within the following months, Yusef’s project took on new dimensions. The situation in Gaza was aggravated due to the military occupation, which displaced 85% of Gaza’s population and halted economic activities, further worsening poverty and unemployment. Demand for food and water escalated and Yusef switched focus from supporting families during Ramadan to providing everyday essentials for civilians in need.

Between April 2023 and May 2024, more than 1,500 people had donated to the cause. This has enabled Yusef to repeatedly buy food and potable water for 20,000 families in Gaza, each with an average of five to seven members. About 500 of the people he helps are orphans.

Fumble explains that having a Geyser project made it easier for people to support Yusef’s efforts. Today, Yusef relies on these donations to continually source tinned food, baby supplies, potable water, bags of flour, clothing, and access to medication for civilians. Donations have also been ensuring that Yusef has enough credit on his e-SIM card to stay connected and up-to-date on what the community needs, and so he can access the donations received through the project.

“More people over here are now using Bitcoin, there’s no other way.”

Within two months of the start of the war, unemployment in Gaza had surged to 79.3%. Locals lack sources of income and access to water, sanitation, healthcare, and education. Half of the local population are children. Meanwhile, even those who had savings in the bank found themselves unable to make transactions.

“During wars, you’re left with only the change you had in your wallet,” Yusef explains over a glitchy call, where Fumble is also present to help bridge our language gap. “Bank apps in our phones are down and banks are freezing accounts in Gaza. We only have cash or Bitcoin.”

Fumble explains that the Palestinian economy runs on the Israeli shekel and that Gaza’s financial system is almost completely dependent on Israel, which must approve the movement of cash into the area.”The occupation is why payment processors don’t facilitate it, and it is the reason why Israel has control over transactions that come to their banks,” says Fumble.

Because of this, many Palestinians relied on contacts from abroad to manage or access their funds, but tales abound of people who trusted someone to receive their money only to find that the person wouldn’t pass it over to its rightful owner. Those who do pass on the money often charge a steep fee upwards of 30%.

For people like Yusef, Bitcoin emerged stronger than ever as an alternative. Its peer-to-peer, permissionless nature enables him to bypass financial and platform barriers to get aid from abroad and help people on the ground. Additionally, fees to exchange bitcoin into fiat money are around 5%, making it cheaper and faster than the alternative. “You can see why more people over here are now using Bitcoin; there’s no other way,” Yusef shares.

Additionally, other crowdfunding platforms either don’t operate in Gaza or have blacklisted it, so you can’t use them to send or receive funds if you’re registered in Palestine. Geyser continues to enable people in this location to raise funds using bitcoin, with added precautions such as requiring users to ID themselves to ensure funds are not being used to support sanctioned individuals.

“Citizens have no fault in this war, that’s why I help them.”

To further complicate the economic situation in Gaza, many families are separated by enforced displacement as Palestinian men are detained at scale while their families are told to flee. “Fathers were the key breadwinners in Gaza, and many families are now left to fend for themselves. These are the people most often coming to my door asking for help,” says Yusef.

To help them, Yusef regularly drives to Rafah in search of supplies. The commute isn’t easy. Dislocation across Gaza makes Yusef more vulnerable to being targeted while thorough inspections by military forces restrict the goods coming into Rafah from Egypt. “Supplies are being deliberately restricted,” explains Fumble. “There’s no anesthetic, no insulin, medical respirators are punctured… Even a pair of medical scissors may be considered a weapon and used as an excuse to reject a batch of supplies. Not to mention trucks are deliberately being delayed so the food goes bad.” When asked about what motivates him to carry on, Yusef replies simply: “Citizens have no fault in this war, that’s why I help them.”

But there are also good days. In March 2024, Yusef managed to buy 2,700 chickens from Egypt to feed his community. The order qualified as ‘commercial capacity’, which simplified the bureaucracy across borders. These large-scale transactions are a source of hope for Yusef, but they’re only possible when substantial donations come in.

In April 2024, Yusef’s project received $48k worth of bitcoin. I ask Yusef whether he is proud or surprised by this achievement, to which he says: “My greatest achievement has been getting people, especially children, the help they need.” More recently, he built almost 100 tents to shelter displaced families.

Although his project consistently ranks amongst the most funded on Geyser, it sometimes struggles to keep up with the relentless needs and expenses Yusef has been trying to meet. For example, not only is food hard to come by but it also comes at a huge price inflation when available. On the week of our call, soon after Yusef raised $48k on Geyser, donations became scarce and he came close to selling his car so he’d have money to help people in desperate need of medical aid. “To help more people, we need the money to access large-scale supplies and rent cars or trucks to transport those goods to displaced communities,” he explains.

Using bitcoin to meet people’s immediate needs, one day at a time

Online, the work is carried out on X, where Fumble helps Yusef spread the word about the project so the trickle of donations doesn’t dry out. “Yusef sends me videos of the work being carried out on the ground, which helps to prove that the project is credible and genuine. The consistency with which he shares those videos helps to demonstrate transparency about his intentions. The challenge is sharing as much information as possible without compromising people’s safety,” Fumble explains.

“You have to be very mindful,” says Fumble. “We want to show as much as possible what’s happening and Yusef’s first-hand content is precious in that regard. The more transparency, the more likely people are to donate. But at the same time, we need to protect innocent civilians in Gaza, many of whom feel quite abandoned by the world.”

Alongside that sentiment, Palestinians stick to the long held mantra “steadfast.” When asked whether he has hopes that life will return to normal, Yusef doesn’t hesitate: “Yes, of course.”

Until then, Fumble thinks about how else he can help civilians in Gaza. On the cards is the possibility of manufacturing and supplying 3D-printed prosthetics for children who’ve lost limbs during this conflict. “When I share these ideas with Yusef, he just says ‘God willing’,” says Fumble, “because he doesn’t take anything for granted; he’s working hard to meet people’s immediate needs. The bitcoin donations have become that lifeline he’s holding on to get people through just one more day.”

Donate to Yusef’s Save Gaza project here

This is a guest post by Michele Morucci. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.





Source link

Continue Reading

Culture

Bitcoin's Trump Card: Dividing Is The Wrong Move

Published

on


Courtesy of Bitcoin magazine, Trump (left) with Bitcoin Magazine CEO David Bailey (right)

Ever since Donald Trump became more vocal in support of Bitcoin heading into this year’s Presidential campaign, I’ve been sitting with a wide range of emotions and concerns.

Outside of Bitcoin, as a left-leaning voter and vocal critic of Donald Trump, I have deep concerns with such an ego-centric, narcissistic character assuming power in the oval office again, not to mention the damage this could do to issues I deeply care about in the U.S. including a woman’s right to choose, reproductive rights, immigration, global affairs, and beyond.

I came into Bitcoin and began writing, running the Progressive Bitcoiner, and advocating for Bitcoin to those outside of the right leaning/libertarian bubble because I had great concerns about Bitcoin being perceived as “right wing” or politically polarizing. It’s open source code, digital peer-to-peer cash, not belonging to any one ideology or political party. I believe in its importance to radically improve our world, and the lives of millions and billions of people. Already from the left, campaigns like Greenpeace USA, Elizabeth Warren’s anti-crypto army, and beyond assume Bitcoin to be a haven for criminals and terrorists, climate denying fossil fuel tycoons, and only for the wealthy and wall street. Despite advances in data showing Bitcoin is one of the most, if not the most, sustainable industries on the planet, it’s growing list of human rights use-cases and more, appealing to progressives and the left about Bitcoin (yes Bitcoin specifically, not crypto) continues to be an uphill battle. What should we expect after years of Bitcoin’s loudest voices promoting various right leaning ideologies, encouraging books like the Bitcoin Standard, various right wing lifestyle maximalism tropes including carnivore diets, traditional family values, skepticism of science and climate science, and beyond.

Winklevoss brothers with Trump

The Trump campaign, and Bitcoiners openly donating to, engaging with, and stanning for Trump makes my job a lot harder. Metaphorically, we went from going fishing (regarding steady bitcoin adoption) to throwing a grenade in the water, without the slightest pause for how this may affect the bigger picture.

The reality is, post 2016 with the election of Donald Trump, and the doubling down of Hillary and the Democratic party calling his supports a “basket of deplorables,” (yes I’m quite critical of the left too!) our political polarization has skyrocketed, leaving most to feel politically homeless (some studies suggesting between 70 million to 100 million Americans).

The left has been corrupted by purity culture. If your view, means to an end, etc. has not been approved by The Left Regime (or you are not well versed on dozens of leftist philosophers and the latest theories), you’re out! Trump and bitcoiners aside, this is also why it’s so hard to get them to engage on bitcoin, because it’s not what their tribe uses, it’s right wing money (according to them).

The right has been overtaken by Trump and a party of valueless debauchery. Conservatives/republicans used to be values driven with actually policy and ideas, which I could agree or disagree with. Now it’s just complete chaos fueled and led by Trump, who has no political philosophy or value system, just ego.

Bitcoin should be a tool to cut through this noise. A tool that any ideology in this case can find useful and valuable. Instead, I’m deeply concerned the narrative may very well latch on to Trump-ism for the next several years, and beyond. Am I ultimately concerned about Bitcoin, its code, usefulness, use-cases, and beyond? Not for this Trump/political reason, no not necessarily (I do have concerns about regulatory capture via ETF’s, mining centralization, lack of privacy and better tools for bitcoin’s peer-to-peer use, etc…but that’s a chat for another time).

I just simply think it’s a bad move for bitcoiners to put all their eggs in the Trump basket, or any political basket for that matter. There’s severe reputational risk, slow down of adoption in the U.S. for those (especially on the left) that will see this as “Trump’s thing” or “right wing” and further this narrative, and the politicians who will respond by doubling down on narratives they continue to try to push against Bitcoin.

Photo by Rob Curran on Unsplash

For Bitcoin’s social layer, I think it’s in the best interest to continue educating on bitcoin, advocating for grassroots adoption at the individual/community level, holding politicians accountable when they try to overstep (like Elizabeth Warren wanting to institute a backdoor ban on self-custody…no, we’re not going to let that fly, much less how that’s blatantly unconstitutional), and not desperately clinging to politicians’ words on the campaign trail, no matter who they are, that are purely pandering for votes, regardless of what may happen once they are in office (or what they can actually do, versus the legislative and judiciary branches).

As for me, an independent voter, I care deeply about Bitcoin, it’s long-term success, and seeing as many people as possible around the world use and benefit from this revolutionary money and technology. Both for Bitcoin, and for reasons beyond Bitcoin and into my values I stated above, I cannot in good conscience support Donald Trump. You don’t have to vote for Donald Trump to support, learn about or use Bitcoin, or contribute to the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Whether you agree or disagree with me, my hope is that among a growing chorus of Trump supporters from the Bitcoin community, those on the outside looking in may see that not all of us are on the same page, and that Bitcoin is for anyone regardless of your political party or who you plan to vote for come November.

This is a guest post by Trey Walsh. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement [ethereumads]

Trending

    wpChatIcon